• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Monitoring the situation in Iran



"
Iran confirms burial list for tomorrow's funeral in Tehran. Among the dead:

• Chief of General Staff Mousavi
• IRGC Commander-in-Chief Pakpour
• Ali Shamkhani — National Defense Council Secretary
• Defense Minister Nasirzadeh
• Mohammad Shirazi — Head of Supreme Commander's Office
Seyed Abdolrahim Mousavi — Chief of General Staff of the Armed Forces
• Mohammad Pakpour — Commander-in-Chief of the IRGC
• Ali Shamkhani — Secretary of the National Defense Council
• Aziz Nasirzadeh — Minister of Defense
• Mohammad Shirazi — Head of the Office of the Supreme Commander
• Darreh Baghi — Senior Commander
• Ali Tajik — Senior Commander
• Davood Asgari — Senior Commander
• Hosseini Motlagh — Senior Commander
• Babaeian — Senior Commander
• Helali — Senior Commander
• Rezaeian — Senior Commander
"





Ba0UDTpUG48MM1Mp.jpeg
 
Sadly in the last few months we've lost a lot of the prominent gaming side posters in political threads.

I agree with @Gonzito that a thread ban would have been preferable over a blanket site ban.
You thinking that "prominent posters" deserve special privileges and protection is the problem here. Resetera is notorious for having a multi-tiered system where some posters are more equal than others. If that's the kind of place you prefer, maybe you should go there
 
You thinking that "prominent posters" deserve special privileges and protection is the problem here. Resetera is notorious for having a multi-tiered system where some posters are more equal than others. If that's the kind of place you prefer, maybe you should go there
Some people have a hard time not getting worked up about politics (obviously why it's not allowed as a general rule). Obviously, major events like Iran are dictated by politics, so the political aspect comes up to some degree. As we see in this thread, Epstein thread and others, most users are able to touch a little on the political background of issues without going full-throated partisan. Some people can't, and end up acting like idiots.

I've got family and friends just like this. They're great to talk to about anything else, but if politics come up, I have to walk away. They become insane and instantly heated and irrational. Maybe we can find a way to help protect people from themselves?
 
You thinking that "prominent posters" deserve special privileges and protection is the problem here. Resetera is notorious for having a multi-tiered system where some posters are more equal than others. If that's the kind of place you prefer, maybe you should go there

People having different political opinions isn't 'special privileges'. A thread ban would at least have posters who post good, relevant, content elsewhere on the forum not be banned from everywhere entirely.
 
People having different political opinions isn't 'special privileges'. A thread ban would at least have posters who post good, relevant, content elsewhere on the forum not be banned from everywhere entirely.
Having different political opinions isn't enough to earn a ban from the current GAF, in case you haven't noticed already with the numerous posters who have conductied themselves civilly while disagreeing with each other about the subject of this thread

Some people have a hard time not getting worked up about politics (obviously why it's not allowed as a general rule). Obviously, major events like Iran are dictated by politics, so the political aspect comes up to some degree. As we see in this thread, Epstein thread and others, most users are able to touch a little on the political background of issues without going full-throated partisan. Some people can't, and end up acting like idiots.

I've got family and friends just like this. They're great to talk to about anything else, but if politics come up, I have to walk away. They become insane and instantly heated and irrational. Maybe we can find a way to help protect people from themselves?
"Politics as a Personality" is a serious problem on the Internet and in real life. Coddling people who have adopted politics as their entire personality isn't helpful for us or for them. That's how you end up with a place like Reddit. At some point, someone will need to burst their bubble that politics isn't an excuse to be rude, insulting, and even violent both IRL and on the Internet. Giving them special protection just because it's politics isn't the solution to anything and only encourages that kind of behavior
 
Having different political opinions isn't enough to earn a ban from the current GAF, in case you haven't noticed already with the numerous posters who have conductied themselves civilly while disagreeing with each other about the subject of this thread

Respectfully disagree, specifically based on midgen's ban, IMO.

Anyway, I think I'm gonna heed my own words and only post things that are confirmed news pieces in this thread from now on.
 
Last edited:
"Politics as a Personality" is a serious problem on the Internet and in real life. Coddling people who have adopted politics as their entire personality isn't helpful for us or for them. That's how you end up with a place like Reddit. At some point, someone will need to burst their bubble that politics isn't an excuse to be rude, insulting, and even violent both IRL and on the Internet. Giving them special protection just because it's politics isn't the solution to anything and only encourages that kind of behavior
I don't disagree with you entirely, here. You're right, when someone's entire personality is dictated by their partisanship, it is bad. But ostracizing those people from a community with differing opinions will only force them to seek out echo chambers; places where they're never exposed to the terrifying reality that other people think differently than they do. That's why places like Reddit and Era have become what they are today--hiveminds where differing opinions are not only rejected, they're punished.

I just wish there was an easy way to help these people realize their opinions aren't the only correct ones, and that nothing in life is black and white. We all have blind spots in our mirrors.
 
Respectfully disagree, specifically based on midgen's ban, IMO.

Anyway, I think I'm gonna heed my own words and only post things that are confirmed news pieces in this thread from now on.
We don't know the whole story. Maybe he kept posting something that was deleted and wouldn't stop? It may not have been from his posts that are still up.
 
Better to remove their ability to post in this obviously political thread in those case IMO. This is a hot button topic and it's a shame if we lose people who are good posters in non political topics.
Reading the room coupled with a bit of self control probably would have gone a long way towards not being removed from the forum because of posts in a political thread.
 
Respectfully disagree, specifically based on midgen's ban, IMO.

Anyway, I think I'm gonna heed my own words and only post things that are confirmed news pieces in this thread from now on.
Looking at his posts in this thread, he spent most of the time demonising the US and Israel while downplaying the nature of the Iranian regime. Didn't seem like he was engaging in good faith and seemed like he was trying to impose his views on everyone else in this thread. I don't know why he was banned, but I highly doubt it was for having an "opinion".
 
Police using excessive force to catch bombers that tried to kill people? I mean they didn't kill them on the spot (they should).
Just saying the way that tweet is worded sounds suspicious as fuck.. "He was quoted as saying" means that it is not even a first hand account.

Besides excessive force in any scenario is wrong regardless. Particularly since it can later be used by the assailants as a defense or mitigation in sentencing.
 
I will laught so hard when the US wants to end the war and Iran refuses and keeps the str8 closed for months. It will be funny the panic when those reserves start to shrink. The US must rebuild everything they destroyed and the Iran opens the str8. That's just fair.
Well done Trump... What a fking narcisistic moron.
 
how the f*** one day Iranians can protest get killed in masses and now cheer it's new "elected" leader?
2340576-426863-756x425.jpg

Or maybe because on that day mysteriously 3 ak- armed bearded men shows at the someone's door there and "hey, wanna come to our small gathering for the praise of our leader? Or do you prefer tomorrow's, in our more intimate small "gathering"?


More on the FA-18 and F-15e incident
 
how the f*** one day Iranians can protest get killed in masses and now cheer it's new "elected" leader? Trump must be in panic seeing this.
2340576-426863-756x425.jpg
The country has been run as a theocracy. The people who are deeply devoted to the cause are not insignificant. The regime would not have been able to repress everyone else if they had no support.
 
Speaking of obvious false flags, it's awfully convenient the 'bombs' thrown by the 'jihadis' in New York failed to explode and then the 'terrorists' got arrested without any resistance.
Wait... what? Not every IED works even when it seems like everything is done right assuming competence, and not everyone is capable of making one even if following directions. I know folks who somehow screw up making a bowl of Top Ramen.
 
It's a fake quote from a twitter account that literally has the word "satire" in its name.

It is a fake quote.

Saying that, it is very odd to see the US push the Islamophobic narrative, which I thought was just a thing in the UK.

Islamophobia is a bit of a slippery slope because in my eyes it's just back door blasphemy laws, which would be unthinkable in a country like the US.
 
I just cannot fathom at 18 /19 years of age wanting to throw a bomb into a home, All I wanted at that age was Alchohol ,cigarettes and loose women!
Its an indictment of the parents and the environment they were exposed to.

I still consider 18/19 year old "snot nosed" kids.
 
Last edited:
It's a fake quote from a twitter account that literally has the word "satire" in its name.

This quote might be fake but his officials statements before that were downplaying this terrorist acts vs. labeling peacful protesters as "far right".

His agenda is very obvious and people from minorities in power will always protect and help "their people" over native population.
 
This quote might be fake but his officials statements before that were downplaying this terrorist acts vs. labeling peacful protesters as "far right".

His agenda is very obvious and people from minorities in power will always protect and help "their people" over native population.
Especially when the goal of Islam is to spread and make every place it goes to a caliphate and institute their laws.
 
So, you think that this makes it ok to bomb children and throwing bombs at the streets? Ok. I'm wondering how would you feel if bombs started to fall in manhattan.
Besides go read some history. The sha government was no democracy either. It wasn't all roses either.
Edit: and we all know that neither israel or trump gives too fucks about that.
that was Iran not us.
and I don't know if you know this but war is hell
 
This quote might be fake but his officials statements before that were downplaying this terrorist acts vs. labeling peacful protesters as "far right".

His agenda is very obvious and people from minorities in power will always protect and help "their people" over native population.
Always is a strong word. It's not always the case.
 
Top Bottom