• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Most common reason kids get bullied? Weight (NYT)

Status
Not open for further replies.

marrec

Banned
I have mad respect for a lot of stuff you say Marrec - not that this means anything to you, but when I see you post, I tend to pay more attention because you're a very smart guy. But when you say it's just as easy to lose it, you're discounting the mental struggle that goes into losing it. It's not just as easy to lose as it is to gain. You can't just carelessly lose weight like you can gaining. Changing your eating habits is great, but it takes time, perseverance and a HUGE amount of willpower - and, as you've pointed out, all the amazingly awesome food that's out there.

I've started eating berries for my sweet tooth, but eating berries is nothing compared to what I could (and would rather) do to a bag of M&Ms. The shit food is so prevalent because it's tuned far better to what our tastebuds like vs what's actually good for us (which isn't tuned to anything but what it is.)

I left a little implied irony in my statement by saying "it's just a matter of reversing the habits" because we all know that habits are extremely hard to break and especially so those that are tied to the pleasure centers of our brains like eating food. So yes, it's "easy" because for most people it's a simple matter of calories in vs. calories out. The hard part is actually doing it for an extended period of time.

I agree that losing weight isn't "easy" in the tradition sense of the world. I suppose I should have said, "simple".

Edit:

Ami- I'm still reading and parsing your reply. I admit that I'm far more ignorant on this issue than on most others I comment on.
 

Idba

Member
Let's just bulletpoint some of the issues at play:

● Genetic (More than 400 different genes have been implicated in the development of overweight or obesity)
● Physiology (metabolic rate or how fast you burn calories for ex.)
● Behavior (types of foods you choose to eat, for ex.)
● Satiety (your ability to feel "full")
● Your level of mobility (some people physically cannot be more active for one reason or another; heart problems, disabilities, access to safe environments for play)
● Your family history ("If both of your parents have obesity, your likelihood of developing obesity is as high as 80%.")
● Environmental (access to types of foods, the way a country advertises or prices certain foods, your level of economic prosperity)

1. If you burn fat slower then you need to consume less calories than those who burn faster. If you include cardio you will burn fat anyways. (Of course there are exemptions but this applies to the majority.)
2, 3. Eating processed foods and sweets will make take way longer to fill your stomach than fruits, veggies and non-processed food and at the same time contain more calories and less nutrients. The more you eat the more your stomach expands allowing you to eat even more without feeling full, this can be reversed tho.
4. I think a large part of this is the parents passing on their eating habits and cooking/not cooking unhealthy food to their kids thus making them overweight too.
 

JCX

Member
I began to get overweight in middle school, but because I have big hands and my siblings/dad/grandfathers are tall, the doctor just said I'd grow into my weight, so I never took action to fix my weight. Unfortunately, I ended up just below average height, so I actually needed to lose weight.

Some people are lucky though, I had friends who were chubby and grew into their weight. Nothing is really settled until after puberty.
 

marrec

Banned
1. If you burn fat slower then you need to consume less calories than those who burn faster. If you include cardio you will burn fat anyways. (Of course there are exemptions but this applies to the majority.)
2, 3. Eating processed foods and sweets will make take way longer to fill your stomach than fruits, veggies and non-processed food and at the same time contain more calories and less nutrients. The more you eat the more your stomach expands allowing you to eat even more without feeling full, this can be reversed tho.
4. I think a large part of this is the parents passing on their eating habits and cooking/not cooking unhealthy food to their kids thus making them overweight too.

Again, I'm still reading and parsing but...

The more I read, and even sources provided by Amirox, the more I'm coming to the conclusion that the science has concluded over a general swath of the population a change in diet and exercise will result in weight loss and overall health increases. This includes people who have a propensity for gaining and keeping weight.
 

kamorra

Fuck Cancer
There is no actual way to quantify how often it is true. That's the problem. Because in every case, it is always a complicated mix of factors. Those factors may simply be easier for some than for others. And those factors range wildly from person to person.

If there is no actual way to quantify how often it is true I have to wonder how can you be so sure that it's always a complicated mix of factors, in every case. There must be a impossible number of factors if it really ranges wildly from person to person.
 

Amir0x

Banned


If there is no actual way to quantify how often it is true I have to wonder how can you be so sure that it's always a complicated mix of factors, in every case. There must be a impossible number of factors if it really ranges wildly from person to person.

You don't understand how the science I'm explaining here works I think.

For every single person alive, your ability to gain weight or lose weight/keep it off is the result of a complicated set of factors. To clarify, what this means is that you - kamorra - as a person are the result of a mix of environmental, genetic and other factors. There is no one alive where this is not true, because everyone is partially governed by their environment and genes. Unless you are some alien species that does not have genes and does not have an environment, everyone is the result of a complicated mix of these factors.

In the individualized analysis of these factors, however, everyone will be different. So you might have a family history where most people are a healthy weight. You might have no genetic markers that increase your severe risk for obesity. You may live in a country which has a far more healthy approach to eating and teaching people about weight loss. You may be economically secure enough to buy the appropriate foods to stay healthy, and you may have control of your environment down to the absolute whole. Your ability therefore to be healthy and not obese is still the combination of a complicated mix of factors.

Again, I'm still reading and parsing but...

The more I read, and even sources provided by Amirox, the more I'm coming to the conclusion that the science has concluded over a general swath of the population a change in diet and exercise will result in weight loss and overall health increases. This includes people who have a propensity for gaining and keeping weight.

They conclude that diet and exercise is the treatment that works best to fight the problem of obesity. Nobody has said otherwise. You're simply missing huge, empire state building sized nuance in that conclusion though.

Because even though diet and exercise will work for most people (that is to say: reducing caloric intake and burning calories via exercise is the obvious treatment), how easy it is to diet and exercise varies dramatically from person to person. You can tell someone with a severe genetic or environmental issue to "just lose weight by dieting and exercising, it's easy", and the statistical likelihood of them being successful is significantly lower for someone without those markers. That's why I used institutional racism in comparison (again, not comparing racism itself to obesity, but the probability of success in either case - just want to be clear here). You can tell someone of color that they just need to go to college and stay out of trouble and X, Y and Z and they'll be successful (or at least live a decent life), but because of a complicated set of factors the likelihood that will be true in the end for them even if they attempted to follow these guidelines is significantly lower than it is for you.

That's why the foundational skill needs to be empathy for everyone.
 


If there is no actual way to quantify how often it is true I have to wonder how can you be so sure that it's always a complicated mix of factors, in every case. There must be a impossible number of factors if it really ranges wildly from person to person.

Why do you need to quantify how often it is true? What is the relevance of that to you (other than the obvious moral high ground)?
 

marrec

Banned


If there is no actual way to quantify how often it is true I have to wonder how can you be so sure that it's always a complicated mix of factors, in every case. There must be a impossible number of factors if it really ranges wildly from person to person.

No no, I'm fairly certain it's always a complicated mix of factors as well. However those factors are likely not going to prevent weight loss given a proper diet and activity level.

Amirox, you have proven that people have different genetic compositions and that those compositions are correlated with weight in some cases. Yet nowhere in the literature did it say that a proper diet and exercise would not be recommended in those cases.

Here, in Obesity: genes, glands or gluttony?, the first study you provided, they say:

Physical activity and diet affect overall adiposity; moreover, exercise specifically reduces visceral fat.
and here
Single gene mutations are being identified in a few morbidly obese people; however, the common genetic predisposition for obesity may relate to more subtle variations in regulatory controls.

They are not saying that diet and exercise DONT work, they're saying it's less effective and that in some cases it may be necessary to take more extreme measures.

Education and availability of lower-energy foods may help, but more radical approaches may be needed, such as environmental restructuring to increase physical activity.

This isn't a damning study showing that genetic factors take the control out from most obese people. Many other articles I've read on the subject form much the same opinion. Genetic factors confound the simple formula of "+Activity-Food=Healthy" but in general that formula is going to work, you just need to adjust as needed.

Amirox said:
And telling people to eat healthy and exercise is nice (and we absolutely should try to do this in more active and engaging ways), but someone with some of these issues will have an infinitely harder time of it. A comparison would be the way institutional racism works (bear with me - I'm not comparing obesity to racism, but the statistical probability of success in either case). Yes, an individual of color can still possibly achieve success despite the road blocks that make it significantly harder to achieve that success. But telling that person it's easy if you just do X, Y and Z is nonsense. It's just not true. They live by a different set of factors than you do. For someone with these issues, it is exponentially more difficult to be successful in not just losing the weight but keeping it off. That's indisputable science. That's why it's important to actually be able to take yourself out of the equation and put yourself in someone else's shoes.

Let's just bulletpoint some of the issues at play:

● Genetic (More than 400 different genes have been implicated in the development of overweight or obesity)
● Physiology (metabolic rate or how fast you burn calories for ex.)
● Behavior (types of foods you choose to eat, for ex.)
● Satiety (your ability to feel "full")
● Your level of mobility (some people physically cannot be more active for one reason or another; heart problems, disabilities, access to safe environments for play)
● Your family history ("If both of your parents have obesity, your likelihood of developing obesity is as high as 80%.")
● Environmental (access to types of foods, the way a country advertises or prices certain foods, your level of economic prosperity)


And the issue is you and everyone else have no clue where someone falls on this spectrum. Much like one person may be able to quit drugs easily and another may fight the disease their entire life, it shows a profound lack of empathy to not understand just how different the human experience is from person to person. And this is why it's important we teach that skill of empathy. Because there is so little true understanding people have for life experiences outside their own narrow sphere.

What it comes down to isn't the idea that diet and exercise shouldn't be recommended but that we should be sympathetic toward the effort given by those who may have confounding genetic issues and I will go ahead and speak for everyone who may be fat-shaming in this thread and say that yes, we all agree. If someone is trying to lose weight and finding it difficult based on their genes and their environment then we cannot simply tell them to try harder. We have to encourage and prop them up with support and understanding.

But they do have to try harder.

Some people are going to have to work harder to lose weight but it can and will be accomplished in almost every case given enough time and work and education. The issues you list affect EVERY case of weight loss and not all of them may even be correlative to weight gain.

I may be being optimistic and naive here but I don't think most adults lack the empathy required to see that someone who is struggling to lose weight needs to be built up, and not torn down.

We absolutely can. Because the first thing we should be teaching everyone on this planet is not to be a hateful little shit. We must punish the perpetrators, not the victims. If someone makes a poor life decision that is inflicted harm to themselves, the appropriate response is not being an asshole to them. Not only does this usually make the situation worse, but it's just a gross way to be to people. So, teaching people to be kind to others is actually part of helping improve the odds of weight loss or quitting drugs or whatever issue there is. Until the day you have superhuman mental capacity to see what precise issue made someone obese, this whole behavior needs to be squelched in the most dramatic way possible. Yes, we'll never stop it completely. But the reason it is this bad is because society as a whole has made it acceptable. Kids see their parents fat shaming people on television or discussing impossible standards of beauty. They internalize it. And then they become the monsters themselves.

Everything else follows. If you have empathy, you will create proactive campaigns of weight loss where the entire community might be lovingly involved. You can create systems of improvement wherein it is understanding for the individual suffering (few people actually want to be obese), rather than trying to say such hurtful things like "it's easy." It's not much of the time: science proves it. And I believe in the research, not my gut feeling.

My point was that we cannot let our need for empathy get in the way of sound medical advice. A doctor shouldn't have to consider his patient's specific genetic makeup before he advises the overweight 45 year old man who just wandered into his office.

Eat right, activity. That's the start. Do that and then we can see where you need to go from there. Eventually you may need pharmaceutical help to maintain your cholesterol or diabetes but eat right, activity is what you need every day of your life for the rest of your life. You and everyone else reading this thread need that.

It's not bullying or fat-shaming to proclaim this from the mountaintop.

It is bullying or fat-shaming to look at a specific poster, though, and say "you obviously didn't try hard enough and are fat now because you choose to be". That's not helpful.

Nobody is saying don't give healthy advice. We're saying that giving the advice is just a reduction method; many will remain obese, and many of those people will be obese for either reasons completely out of their control or for reasons of it being incalculably more difficult to lose and keep off the weight than it is for you.

So we can and should have these campaigns for healthy living while coming down fucking brutally hard on people who think it's OK to be awful little shits to their fellow human beings.

There actually were people saying to not give healthy advice.
 

Amir0x

Banned
There actually were people saying to not give healthy advice.

Marrec, in the rest of this post you're arguing against something I've not said, so my last post addresses this problem with your arguments.

As for this, can you point to someone who literally said "do not give healthy advice" to the country to reduce obesity? I'm curious because I've read the thread and have not seen it, so maybe I missed it.
 

marrec

Banned
Marrec, in the rest of this post you're arguing against something I've not said, so my last post addresses this problem with your arguments.

As for this, can you point to someone who literally said "do not give healthy advice" to the country to reduce obesity? I'm curious because I've read the thread and have not seen it, so maybe I missed it.

This is the post that started me on my current tangent:

It's a bit insulting to overweight people to think some quick advice in a thread like this is going to change their lives.

It was followed up by more:
To me, it's like when people tell me their tricks to lessen sadness when I'm experiencing a full-blown depression.

Your heart is in the right place, but that doesn't mean you're being helpful.

Edit: And in a thread about bullying, we should be focusing on the bullies.

Online, yes. Unless you know the person, their eating and activity habits, you're in no place to give any sort of advice unless the person asks. That's all. For someone actively working on losing weight and having trouble, casual advice isn't gonna do shit, they've heard it a million times and calling it "easy" (not saying you did that) is only going to frustrate them. Advice like "eat healthier and do more activity" can be insulting to their intelligence.

Their hearts are obviously in the right place but we cannot be so scared of insulting someone who is overweight that we stop giving out the most basic and accepted of medical advices.

You and I both agree that empathy is required in everyday dealings with people but that doesn't change the fact that diet and exercise if accomplished and continued throughout life will help someone lose weight and live longer.

I spoke on the first page of food deserts because I'm aware that not everyone has access to the proper foods needed for a healthy diet. Thats why I think part of the way we solve the voluntary obesity epidemic is by dealing with issues such as those.

MORE EDITS:

I guess you could sum up my posts with: Empathy Isn't Going To Solve The Obesity Epidemic... especially in kids.
 
This is interesting. In most student surveys I have seen, kids are bullied more on sexual preference (perceived or real) than anything else.
 

Amir0x

Banned
This is the post that started me on my current tangent:



It was followed up by more:



Their hearts are obviously in the right place but we cannot be so scared of insulting someone who is overweight that we stop giving out the most basic and accepted of medical advices.

Well these posts are not quite the same thing as you were saying. The one poster says we should be focusing on the bullying first in this topic (he's absolutely correct), and that he thinks it's insulting to think quick advice in a thread is going to fix the problem.

The other poster says "Online" as a qualifier, so presumably he's saying that unless you know that individual posters life history you should not try to throw out such advice by calling it "easy." He does not say it's wrong to have generalized health campaigns wherein Doctors give advice to help fight weight gain/obesity. He says it's wrong to direct specific advice toward an obese person in an online conversation unless you know their history, and that saying it's 'easy' is insulting (it really is). It is not universally easy, and it's actually extremely hard statistically:

However, research has shown that ≈20% of overweight individuals are successful at long-term weight loss when defined as losing at least 10% of initial body weight and maintaining the loss for at least 1 y.

Read that. Approximately 20% of overweight individuals are successful at long-term weight loss. That's 1 in 5. That should immediately dispel any notions of it being easy... because if it were easy, everybody would be doing it. Few people want to actually be overweight.

Some more reading:

Plenty of people who are obese and medically need to lose weight say they get sick and tired of being told to eat less and exercise more. And for good reason: A growing body of research finds lifestyle and behavioral modifications often are not enough to help someone drop a significant amount of weight and keep it off.

A new paper published in the journal Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology argues that it's high time for obesity to be recognized as a serious chronic disease with biological causes -- not just a result of poor eating habits and sedentary behavior.

The authors, a group of obesity treatment experts, say that while patients may be successful in the first few months of a weight loss program, some 80 to 95 percent will eventually put the weight back on. They say this is because obesity has a lot to do with underlying biological issues in the body that dieting simply can't change.

And this too.
 

marrec

Banned
Well these posts are not quite the same thing as you were saying. The one poster says we should be focusing on the bullying first in this topic (he's absolutely correct), and that he thinks it's insulting to think quick advice in a thread is going to fix the problem.

The topic (of the article at least) is actually about fat stigma more than it is about bullying in schools which are two very different things.

The other poster says "Online" as a qualifier, so presumably he's saying that unless you know that individual posters life history you should not try to throw out such advice by calling it "easy." He does not say it's wrong to have generalized health campaigns wherein Doctors give advice to help fight weight gain/obesity. He says it's wrong to direct specific advice toward an obese person in an online conversation unless you know their history, and that saying it's 'easy' is insulting (it really is). It is not universally easy, and it's actually extremely hard statistically:

Read that. Approximately 20% of overweight individuals are successful at long-term weight loss. That's 1 in 5. That should immediately dispel any notions of it being easy... because if it were easy, everybody would be doing it. Few people want to actually be overweight.

I can't speak for others, but when I say losing weight is "easy" I really should say "simple" because that's a more robust word to use as a descriptor. It's simple because it's a matter of calories in vs. calories out. However it's far from "easy" in any traditional definition of easy I agree. That's why continued support and encouragement is almost a requirement for people to lose weight. Study after study shows that a continued social support group increases the chances that someone will lose weight and keep it off.

People put the weight back on usually because they fall back into old habits.

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1014296
 

kamorra

Fuck Cancer
You don't understand how the science I'm explaining here works I think.

Sitting on a high horse instead of walking might also be one of the factors for being overweight. Bad eating habits are the main reason why people are overweight. It really is that simple. Are there sometimes other reasons? Yeah, sure. Is it hard to lose weight? Absolutely. But in most cases having better food habits and exercising will help.
 

Amir0x

Banned
Sitting on a high horse instead of walking might also be one of the factors for being overweight. Bad eating habits are the main reason why people are overweight. It really is that simple. Are there sometimes other reasons? Yeah, sure. Is it hard to lose weight? Absolutely. But in most cases having better food habits and exercising will help.

Your argument is factually incorrect and not supported by science. If you want to simply debate based on your gut feeling (get it: "gut" feeling! ha ha!), that's your prerogative. But you're incorrect. Science does not support your argument. The reason people are overweight is always a complicated set of factors. The reason people have "bad eating habits" are a direct result of a mix of those factors.
 

marrec

Banned
Your argument is factually incorrect and not supported by science. If you want to simply debate based on your gut feeling (get it: "gut" feeling! ha ha!), that's your prerogative. But you're incorrect. Science does not support your argument. The reason people are overweight is always a complicated set of factors. The reason people have "bad eating habits" are a direct result of a mix of those factors.

Well, to be more specific, science shows that long-term weight loss is difficult for most people to achieve not because reducing calorie intake is a short term remedy but because people will not continue a calorie restrictive diet for the rest of their lives. Again, this is as general as science can get and in specific cases this research may be contradictory.
 

Suite Pee

Willing to learn
This is the post that started me on my current tangent:

It was followed up by more:

Marrec, you don't understand what I was saying. You think that obese people don't know that a proper diet and exercise is the path to being thinner? You think that they don't buy the books, read the blogs, browse the forums, ask their friends, do everything in their god damn power to end the shame and guilt they feel?

It's insulting because you act like it's new knowledge for these people.
 
T

thepotatoman

Unconfirmed Member
Again, I'm still reading and parsing but...

The more I read, and even sources provided by Amirox, the more I'm coming to the conclusion that the science has concluded over a general swath of the population a change in diet and exercise will result in weight loss and overall health increases. This includes people who have a propensity for gaining and keeping weight.

Yes, scientifically it's very possible for the vast majority of obese to healthily lose weight, but that doesn't make it scientifically easy anymore than it's scientifically easy to stop being depressed or stop doing drugs. I honestly believe it is the hardest change anyone could ever make in their life. It basically takes the dedication it would take to learn a new language, combined with counteracting the cravings that smokers and alcoholics deal with, combined with the inability to really stop cold turkey thanks to the actual need to eat food, combined with a lower sense of self esteem than just about anything, thanks how much it gets bullied and made fun of and how impossible it is to hide it.

I don't have the time to research it right now to confirm, but I bet you that there's far higher long term success rates for alcohol and tobacco addicts than there are for people trying to lose weight. It sometimes seems like the only ones that ever to have long term success at all are the ones that become absolutely addicted to fitness and turn fitness into their new lifelong hobby.
 

Amir0x

Banned
Well, to be more specific, science shows that long-term weight loss is difficult for most people to achieve not because reducing calorie intake is a short term remedy but because people will not continue a calorie restrictive diet for the rest of their lives. Again, this is as general as science can get and in specific cases this research may be contradictory.

To be specific, science says that all scenarios of weight loss/gain is related to a complicated mix of factors such as genetic and environmental causes. That's what is being discussed. It also says losing weight is incredibly difficult to actually execute.

So in kamorra's case he says "bad eating is the reason people are fat", but that's not actually the root cause. The root cause of people eating badly is that complicated mix of factors. And understanding that is how we find effective ways to fix the epidemic.

I don't have the time to research it right now to confirm, but I bet you that there's far higher long term success rates for alcohol and tobacco addicts than there are for people trying to lose weight. It sometimes seems like the only ones that ever to have long term success at all are the ones that become absolutely addicted to fitness and turn fitness into their new lifelong hobby.

It's actually not even close. Approximately 20% of overweight people ever sustain long-term weight loss. Approximately 75% of people with substance abuse problems will eventually get clean.
 

marrec

Banned
Marrec, you don't understand what I was saying. You think that obese people don't know that a proper diet and exercise is the path to being thinner? You think that they don't buy the books, read the blogs, browse the forums, ask their friends, do everything in their god damn power to end the shame and guilt they feel?

It's insulting because you act like it's new knowledge for these people.

I'm very sympathetic toward the plight of people who find it exceedingly difficult to lose weight and keep it off. Losing weight is not easy and for some it's actually impossible. However the general advice of "eat less, exercise more" is still necessary for almost everyone in almost every walk of life (in the western developed world). Even if eating less and exercising leaves you without much external reward, it's going to be healthier for you, especially as you age.
 

kamorra

Fuck Cancer
So in kamorra's case he says "bad eating is the reason people are fat", but that's not actually the root cause. The root cause of people eating badly is that complicated mix of factors. And understanding that is how we find effective ways to fix the epidemic.

I said bad eating habits are the main reason not the only one. How about we stay honest here? I didn't reduce your post to "bad eating habits and no exercise are never the reason for being overweight" either.

Oh, and about that science part. These people agree with me.
http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/health-topics/topics/obe/causes
http://www.aihw.gov.au/overweight-and-obesity/causes/
These are just two examples from the first page of my google search.
 

Cagey

Banned
Well, to be more specific, science shows that long-term weight loss is difficult for most people to achieve not because reducing calorie intake is a short term remedy but because people will not continue a calorie restrictive diet for the rest of their lives. Again, this is as general as science can get and in specific cases this research may be contradictory.

That's where these threads lose me.

There's an inherent science here: calories in, calories out.

This isn't an instance of telling a poor person to bootstrap their way to success because "hard work" and "education" and the like are subjective factors in and of themselves. Statistically, over large samples, you can demonstrate both factors (work ethic, educational attainment) play roles in financial success, but there's no hard science behind those factors like there is here.

Meanwhile, the science for adding weight maintaining a caloric excess, and losing weight is maintaining a caloric deficit. There's an objective measure at the bedrock of weight gain and weight loss. External, social, biological factors come into play only as means of increasing or decreasing the difficulty for an individual person to ensure they aren't losing control of the math equation.

To say that there's myriad reasons for why a person gains or loses weight can often obsfucate the reason: that person maintains a caloric excess or deficit over what their body has processed and utilized as energy. That doesn't change.

The root cause of gaining or losing weight is not a "complicated set of factors". The root cause for poor eating habits may certainly be hard to pin down, but the root cause of weight gain or loss must inevitably boil down to caloric intake. How one's intake and how one's use of calories changes can be due to various factors all at odds with one another (metabolism, food, prediliction for unhealthy choices, poverty, sedantary life), but however one gets to the # in v. # out, that's what matters in the end.

Or has the science changed on that.
 

marrec

Banned
That's where these threads lose me.

There's an inherent science here: calories in, calories out.

This isn't an instance of telling a poor person to bootstrap their way to success because "hard work" and "education" and the like are subjective factors in and of themselves. Statistically, over large samples, you can demonstrate both factors (work ethic, educational attainment) play roles in financial success, but there's no hard science behind those factors like there is here.

Meanwhile, the science for adding weight maintaining a caloric excess, and losing weight is maintaining a caloric deficit. There's an objective measure at the bedrock of weight gain and weight loss. External, social, biological factors come into play only as means of increasing or decreasing the difficulty for an individual person to ensure they aren't losing control of the math equation.

To say that there's myriad reasons for why a person gains or loses weight can often obsfucate the reason: that person maintains a caloric excess or deficit over what their body has processed and utilized as energy. That doesn't change.

The root cause of gaining or losing weight is not a "complicated set of factors". The root cause for poor eating habits may certainly be hard to pin down, but the root cause of weight gain or loss must inevitably boil down to caloric intake. How one's intake and how one's use of calories changes can be due to various factors all at odds with one another (metabolism, food, prediliction for unhealthy choices, poverty, sedantary life), but however one gets to the # in v. # out, that's what matters in the end.

Or has the science changed on that.

The sciences has most certainly changed to be more nuanced. Epi-genetic factors as well as chronic side-effects of obesity have recently began to be shown to have a greater effect on weight gain than we had once thought... but... The problem is that we're still learning a lot about how our body responds to being overweight. Long term studies show that a calorie restrictive diet that is maintained will maintain weight loss in most individuals... but not in all individuals. Some studies (like the one that the articles that Amirox linked above are based on) seem to indicate that Obese people are chronically fat and only go into brief remission regardless of their diets...

I'd like to see the actually study however before I give any veracity to the reporters talking about the study.
 

Amir0x

Banned
I said bad eating habits are the main reason not the only one. How about we stay honest here? I didn't reduce your post to "bad eating habits and no exercise are never the reason for being overweight" either.

The actual problem in this conversation is you keep drastically misunderstanding what I'm saying, and you think me saying so is being on a "high horse."

Once again, you fail to understand what I'm saying about the Science. This is just a basic observation of what's going on in this conversation.

Bad eating is the cause behind most people being fat. But "bad eating" has its own root cause, which would make that root cause the actual reason why people are fat.

Bad eating's root cause is that complicated mix of factors such as environment and genetics.

Think of it another way: The cause of rain is when warm air cools, reducing its ability to hold water vapor in clouds. Then it rains. But the cause of that water vapor in the clouds has a further root cause, and that's evaporation of the oceans/rivers/etc. So if for some bizarre reason you actually wanted to fix the problem of rain in the world, you'd have to deal with the actual root cause.

kamorra said:
Oh, and about that science part. These people agree with me.
http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/heal...ics/obe/causes
http://www.aihw.gov.au/overweight-and-obesity/causes/
These are just two examples from the first page of my google search.

Did you read your own links?

From the first one ->

"What Causes Overweight and Obesity?"

They list:

+ Lack of Energy Balance
+ An Inactive Lifestyle
+ Environment
+ Genes and Family History
+ Health Conditions
+ Medicines

Thus, a "complicated mix of factors." You're really not helping your case.
 

kamorra

Fuck Cancer
The actual problem in this conversation is you keep drastically misunderstanding what I'm saying, and you think me saying so is being on a "high horse."

Once again, you fail to understand what I'm saying about the Science. This is just a basic observation of what's going on in this conversation.

Bad eating is the cause behind most people being fat. But "bad eating" has its own root cause, which would make that root cause the actual reason why people are fat.

Bad eating's root cause is that complicated mix of factors such as environment and genetics.

Think of it another way: The cause of rain is when warm air cools, reducing its ability to hold water vapor in clouds. Then it rains. But the cause of that water vapor in the clouds has a further root cause, and that's evaporation of the oceans/rivers/etc. So if for some bizarre reason you actually wanted to fix the problem of rain in the world, you'd have to deal with the actual root cause.



Did you read your own links?

From the first one ->

"What Causes Overweight and Obesity?"

They list:

+ Lack of Energy Balance
+ An Inactive Lifestyle
+ Environment
+ Genes and Family History
+ Health Conditions
+ Medicines

Thus, a "complicated mix of factors." You're really not helping your case.

First sentence from the first link
A lack of energy balance most often causes overweight and obesity. Energy balance means that your energy IN equals your energy OUT.

Energy IN is the amount of energy or calories you get from food and drinks. Energy OUT is the amount of energy your body uses for things like breathing, digesting, and being physically active.
That's exactly what I said. You don't want a honest discussion, I'm out.
 

Suite Pee

Willing to learn
You don't want to have a discussion at all and are comically inept at interpreting the science behind this. It's OK dude, I understand.

I do wonder if some understanding of human psychology is required for a discussion like this. It seems like some people assume there's free will involved in these decisions.

Edit: Anyways, in some convoluted way, discussions like this highlight the culture that leads to the bullying discussed in the article in the OP. We've spent almost the entire thread talking about the victims. And, yes, there will always be bullying, but there will always be other bad things. It doesn't mean we can't try to reduce the frequency.
 

BamfMeat

Member
I'm very sympathetic toward the plight of people who find it exceedingly difficult to lose weight and keep it off. Losing weight is not easy and for some it's actually impossible. However the general advice of "eat less, exercise more" is still necessary for almost everyone in almost every walk of life (in the western developed world). Even if eating less and exercising leaves you without much external reward, it's going to be healthier for you, especially as you age.

I think the problem is, ultimately, 99% of people know that they need to eat less calories, burn more calories. Telling them that is redundant. The only thing it serves to do is make them feel shitty(ier) about themselves, repeat something they already know and is completely patronizing to them.

We all have the tools on this forum to go google BMI and BMR and figure out how much less we need to eat of our BMR to get to our ideal BMI. But knowing numbers doesn't take away how easy or hard it actually is for someone.

If the BMR chart tells me that at my weight/height, I burn 2000 calories, but because I've lost 60 pounds and now my body has slowed down enough to put my BMR at 1800 calories, that's 200 calories more that I think I can factor in that I really can't. This happens and when I start not losing weight, it's incredibly frustrating.

Yes, yes yes yes, weight loss is calories out vs calories in, but for fucks sake, being reductive to that point is completely unhelpful, especially when there are so many other factors that contribute (and I'm not talking about, "OH MAH GENES" - I'm talking about things like BMR not being even close to an exact science, I'm talking about the chemical changes your body goes through as it loses weight as I showed in a study earlier.)

Weight loss is not just "count calories and boom! you lose weight!" unless you plan to drop your caloric intake to so far below your BMR that it's a joke. And then you run the risk of malnutrition, etc. You have to have a lot of knowledge in there as well. (which I also agree, we lack as a society.)
 

Amir0x

Banned
I do wonder if some understanding of human psychology is required for a discussion like this. It seems like some people assume there's free will involved in these decisions.

Edit: Any ways, in some convoluted way, discussions like this highlight the culture that leads to the bullying discussed in the article in the OP. We've spent almost the entire thread talking about the victims. And, yes, there will always be bullying, but there will always be other bad things. It doesn't mean we can't try to reduce the frequency.

I mean he doesn't understand that "Energy In/Energy Out" is itself determined by the complicated set of factors we're discussing. That's where the disconnect is happening. He wants to say these things are the root cause, but they're not. A mix of factors relating to genes and environment and other issues are what leads to many people having trouble with the energy in/energy out balance. THAT is the root cause. So telling someone to have a better balance does not necessarily in of itself do anything.

It's this inability to actually grasp the nuance on these discussions that make it difficult. I'm not sure he needs to be able to understand human psychology so much as stop attempting to simplify incredibly complex human systems.
 
Marrec, you don't understand what I was saying. You think that obese people don't know that a proper diet and exercise is the path to being thinner? You think that they don't buy the books, read the blogs, browse the forums, ask their friends, do everything in their god damn power to end the shame and guilt they feel?

It's insulting because you act like it's new knowledge for these people.

To be honest, many obese people don't know that a proper diet and exercise is the path to being thinner.

So many people when dieting put the bulk of their focus on healthy food vs junk food, instead of overall calorie intake.

Also going for short term, quick-fix diets are popular. A lot of people only change their diet for either a few months or whenever their weight loss goals are achieved. Then they switch back to their old lifestyle habits, with the expectation that it won't lead them back to their pre-diet weight.
 

Cagey

Banned
Weight loss is not just "count calories and boom! you lose weight!" unless you plan to drop your caloric intake to so far below your BMR that it's a joke. And then you run the risk of malnutrition, etc. You have to have a lot of knowledge in there as well. (which I also agree, we lack as a society.)

Is there evidence of this characterization?
 

sikkinixx

Member
No surprise. Especially with a large move towards weight lifting and such in the high schools I work at, fat kids get ripped up all the time for it. That, along with "retard" is probably the stuff I have to give kids shit about most.

And in elementary school, I get grief for bringing the kids outside too often because parents complain their kids aren't getting a "proper" education. And allowing their kids to sit on iPhones and play minecraft 12 hours a day certainly doesn't help
 
Other kids used to beat me and verbally abuse me for being fat all the time when I was young. In fact they kept it up across different schools for many years.

To say it left me with "issues" is an understatement.
 
Other kids used to beat me and verbally abuse me for being fat all the time when I was young. In fact they kept it up across different schools for many years.

To say it left me with "issues" is an understatement.

It was the exact opposite for me. I was always short and scrawny; people thought they could pick on me and I wouldn't do anything about it.
 

marrec

Banned
I think the problem is, ultimately, 99% of people know that they need to eat less calories, burn more calories. Telling them that is redundant. The only thing it serves to do is make them feel shitty(ier) about themselves, repeat something they already know and is completely patronizing to them.

I think you're vastly overestimating the number of people who realize what proper nutrition means.

It's a simple mantra but it requires many hours of research to really understand what "eat healthy" means. A lot of people think "eat healthy" means getting a chicken burger and a diet coke at McDonalds or getting a small instead of a large.

Of course, people on NeoGAF are much more informed than the general populace so our sample size is skewed. In general I imagine if you asked a normal obese person what they have done in the past to lose weight, you'd be able to pinpoint specific mistakes they had made in their journey. Now, that isn't to say it's their fault, ignorance isn't willful and reading a book published in 1990 about how to lose weight is tantamount at this point to ignorance.

People need to be versed on the most recent nutritional studies, not south beach diets and keto diets and atkins diets.
 

Moff

Member
Bad eating is the cause behind most people being fat. But "bad eating" has its own root cause, which would make that root cause the actual reason why people are fat.

Bad eating's root cause is that complicated mix of factors such as environment and genetics.

I don't really understand what you are trying to say here. isn't "level of mobility" one of your factors in that complicated mix, how is that a root for bad eating?

I also think you two agree more than you care to admit. of course there are different reasons behind bad eating habits. like how your parents raised you or advertisement or general food culture of your country. but that's no reason to just say "ah its not that easy, stay fat, you know it would really be too hard for you" which is the general vibe I get from your posts here.

first of all I consider most environmental factors to be "easy". every adult who is self aware should be able to overcome these factors.
the only factors you mentioned I consider not easy to conquer would be metabolism and genetics, yes, these people need to put in more effort. but honestly I consider them to be next to negligible if you look at other countries where the environmental factors are different.
http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/Obesity-Update-2014.pdf
so unless you think the people in norway, switzerland, italy, sweden, the netherlands and austria have a completely different genetic background I would say bad eating habits and their environmental background are by far the most important reason behind obesity because the people there have only 10-13% obese people as opposed to the US's 35%. that's a huge difference.
 

Infinite

Member
I don't really understand what you are trying to say here. isn't "level of mobility" one of your factors in that complicated mix, how is that a root for bad eating?

I also think you two agree more than you care to admit. of course there are different reasons behind bad eating habits. like how your parents raised you or advertisement or general food culture of your country. but that's no reason to just say "ah its not that easy, stay fat, you know it would really be too hard for you" which is the general vibe I get from your posts here.

first of all I consider most environmental factors to be "easy". every adult who is self aware should be able to overcome these factors.
the only factors you mentioned I consider not easy to conquer would be metabolism and genetics, yes, these people need to put in more effort. but honestly I consider them to be next to negligible if you look at other countries where the environmental factors are different.
http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/Obesity-Update-2014.pdf
so unless you think the people in norway, switzerland, italy, sweden, the netherlands and austria have a completely different genetic background I would say bad eating habits and their environmental background are by far the most important reason behind obesity because the people there have only 10-13% obese people as opposed to the US's 35%. that's a huge difference.
What if you're poor and don't have the money to lift yourself from a bad environment? What then?
 

The Lamp

Member
It is also one of the easiest things to change about yourself.

This is not a useful position to take regarding society considering 3/4 of American men and 2/3 of American women are now at least overweight. Healthy-weighted people are actually becoming a minority. Even INFANT obesity rates are skyrocketing. Lifestyle and food supply in developed countries is fattening us and something meaningful needs to be done about this public health crisis on a large scale--something more than just diminishing the problem by victimizing and saying it's easily fixable.
 
If only public schools had the funding to prepare better food for students, that could fix part of the obese children problem.
I'm sure they're still serving the same dubious ass schlock when I was their age.
Fuckin' green, cold hot dogs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom