-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Movies You've Seen Recently |OT| September 2015
- Thread starter Charles Foster Kane
- Start date
- Status
Slap Shot is a garbage soulless film. I love the idea of it. And I love Paul Newman, and the triplets, and how it inspired films like Major League. But the film is garbage, and worst of all dull.,.
Rumble Fish though. Not a great film, but a fun film,. Great cast, great director, I really like that movie,
City of Angels. I think it is completely adequate. Outside of the Goo Goo Dolls song, I enjoyed it. This was pre Meg Ryan facial destruction. And Nick Cage is trying. I like that movie., Never mind the Goo Goo Dolls song..
Snowman Prophet of Doom
Member
Night of the Living Dead had a small budget, but it's by far the most realistic, best-written movie in the series. Dawn is a great horror movie, but too on-the-nose with the cultural stuff, whereas Night let things like the racial dimension simmer more subtly.
Junior Asparagus
Member
That's funny. I enjoyed it much less than I thought I would. I'm not really sure why. It moved a little more slowly than I thought, and I thought Depp's makeup was kind of distracting.
Haha, did you just look for all movies with the word "edge" in the title?
my favorites:
Psycho: "1/2 star - its boring. nothing happens until the end and the end is not scary. its in black or white" mostly for that last sentence."
American Psycho: "5 star - i loved this movie so fuckin much. i feel like the main guy sometimes when i walk threw my school. i hate everyone"
The 1/2 star Elmo movie review that's just a list of swears
but best of all is the Sucker Punch review:
Discotheque
Banned
dude's shining review is pretty amazing
Serpentine
Banned
The Overnight - pretty weird mumblecore, but the couple IMDB user reviews i skimmed made me think it'd be insanely bizarre, but nah, pretty weird is about right. It's pretty good and fun though thanks to the chemistry all 4 actors have, and it's super short too (79 minutes!)
fucking lmao
somehow the most scathing review of SP ever, incredible
Johnlenham
Member
nearly spat coffee all over my laptop, lmao
Snowman Prophet of Doom
Member
Maybe dated in terms of effects, but I'd kill for a handful of modern American directors who could make a movie of its overall quality.
ViewtifulJC
Banned
Snowy while you're here, can you tell me why WWE thought it was a good idea to put a 56-year old man in a main event who hasn't wrestled a legit match inyears
Snowman Prophet of Doom
Member
Cuz their current strategy to keep network buyrates up is to find attractions to keep people watching in off months, it seems. Sting this month, Brock/Taker in a cell next month.
To Sting's credit, he did well. Second buckle bomb was reckless to agree to, though.
Freeza Under The Shower
Member
Speaking of directors of name, I watched Rear Window (1954) yesterday. It's strange to see this cramped environment today, considering most have a separate bedroom and not everything enclosed in the same space (which is now a studio, I guess. Though I don't know New York or what conditions there are like now). And the not quite subtle (male dominated) attitudes towards women, though I suspect based on her performance Grace Kelly knew damn well how to play that game, it just wasn't yet the time to tell a guy to shove it when asking about dinner. Thank god that's over. Well... mostly.
It's a really nice movie though, using both the main character's apartment as the movie's viewpoint and at the same time using open windows (and closed ones) to tell the stories of all the other characters in the movie, like a literal frame story. I quite enjoyed this style inside a movie, as well as how it progressed the plot naturally. Particularly the mirroring motif among the framed stories with the main one is a nice addition.
I doubt modern audiences would find it very suspenseful (and tumblr would have field day with this one, yikes), but its skill in the craft of storytelling is undeniable.
It's a really nice movie though, using both the main character's apartment as the movie's viewpoint and at the same time using open windows (and closed ones) to tell the stories of all the other characters in the movie, like a literal frame story. I quite enjoyed this style inside a movie, as well as how it progressed the plot naturally. Particularly the mirroring motif among the framed stories with the main one is a nice addition.
I doubt modern audiences would find it very suspenseful (and tumblr would have field day with this one, yikes), but its skill in the craft of storytelling is undeniable.
Cipher Peon
Banned
I just finished watching The Town That Dreaded Sundown (2014)
_poster.jpg)
While livetweeting it, I was informed that it was a remake. Which is a little frustrating since The Town That Dreaded Sundown (2014) is the kind of remake that I love most. One that uses the original film as a jumping off point and tells a sequel, side story that hits the same beats as the original, like my second favorite remake of all time Evil Dead (2013).
Unfortunately, while Town does hit my happy remake buttons, it fails to deliver on anything really worthwhile. Tension is nonexistent as the movie gets very repetitive very quickly, all of the characters are unlikable, and the twist that Mr Potatohead
was super obvious. Nothing the movie did excited me, and I quickly grew bored of it.
I did, however, really enjoy the cinematography (sometimes) and the score. It felt very soft and sincere, dreamlike in the ways that made movies like Drive and Spring Breakers so compelling. But while I strongly believe that both of those movies had much more to them that made their visuals make the substance even more powerful, The Town That Dreaded Sundown (2014) just has a nice concept that looks pretty and that's about it. Passed the time, though, and I wasn't upset when I left. Could do much worse. Will watch the original eventually to make me like this film even more!
6/10
While livetweeting it, I was informed that it was a remake. Which is a little frustrating since The Town That Dreaded Sundown (2014) is the kind of remake that I love most. One that uses the original film as a jumping off point and tells a sequel, side story that hits the same beats as the original, like my second favorite remake of all time Evil Dead (2013).
Unfortunately, while Town does hit my happy remake buttons, it fails to deliver on anything really worthwhile. Tension is nonexistent as the movie gets very repetitive very quickly, all of the characters are unlikable, and the twist that Mr Potatohead
was actually Mr. Potatoheads
I did, however, really enjoy the cinematography (sometimes) and the score. It felt very soft and sincere, dreamlike in the ways that made movies like Drive and Spring Breakers so compelling. But while I strongly believe that both of those movies had much more to them that made their visuals make the substance even more powerful, The Town That Dreaded Sundown (2014) just has a nice concept that looks pretty and that's about it. Passed the time, though, and I wasn't upset when I left. Could do much worse. Will watch the original eventually to make me like this film even more!
6/10
I just finished watching The Town That Dreaded Sundown (2014)
While livetweeting it, I was informed that it was a remake. Which is a little frustrating since The Town That Dreaded Sundown (2014) is the kind of remake that I love most. One that uses the original film as a jumping off point and tells a sequel, side story that hits the same beats as the original, like my second favorite remake of all time Evil Dead (2013).
Unfortunately, while Town does hit my happy remake buttons, it fails to deliver on anything really worthwhile. Tension is nonexistent as the movie gets very repetitive very quickly, all of the characters are unlikable, and the twist that Mr Potatoheadwas super obvious. Nothing the movie did excited me, and I quickly grew bored of it.was actually Mr. Potatoheads
I did, however, really enjoy the cinematography (sometimes) and the score. It felt very soft and sincere, dreamlike in the ways that made movies like Drive and Spring Breakers so compelling. But while I strongly believe that both of those movies had much more to them that made their visuals make the substance even more powerful, The Town That Dreaded Sundown (2014) just has a nice concept that looks pretty and that's about it. Passed the time, though, and I wasn't upset when I left. Could do much worse. Will watch the original eventually to make me like this film even more!
6/10
Huh, this director also directed Me and Earl and the Dying girl which i just saw and really liked. Guess i should watch this.
Charles Foster Kane
Rosebud
If only they had shut the fuck up
Arkos
Nose how to spell and rede to
Are you meaning Gravity?
Cipher Peon
Banned
One of my absolute favorite films of all time and my 2nd favorite film released in 2014.
It's the last piece of media that I can say changed my life since Silent Hill 2. The movie influenced me in the most positive of ways.
Charles Foster Kane
Rosebud
yes
George Oscar Bluth II
Banned
I liked Gravity enough the first time round, but I don't need to ever watch it again. 3D helped my cinema viewing, which is the first time I've actually liked 3D.
Discotheque
Banned
We are still here is absolute basura for sure.
Anyways I watched black mass. It's a decent flick, good run through of the history of events. But good god, Depp killed it. Even in a decent ensemble like this he overshadows the hell out of it
Very chilling performance. Dude should get nominated no doubt
Anyways I watched black mass. It's a decent flick, good run through of the history of events. But good god, Depp killed it. Even in a decent ensemble like this he overshadows the hell out of it
Very chilling performance. Dude should get nominated no doubt
Effi Briest (Rainer Warner Fassbinder, 1974)
Brilliantly shot, but the excess use of white actually made the subtitles quite hard to read at times since it blended in with the film itself. I know that isn't the filmmakers fault but it was quite annoying, and I usually don't have problems with subtitles (I even watch English stuff with subtitles).
Brilliantly shot, but the excess use of white actually made the subtitles quite hard to read at times since it blended in with the film itself. I know that isn't the filmmakers fault but it was quite annoying, and I usually don't have problems with subtitles (I even watch English stuff with subtitles).
I just noticed your username, lol...
yeah, not a movie I'd rewatch either. Feel like once the novelty wears off there's not much to stand the test of time
I watched Gravity twice in theaters, in Imax 3d then in 2D. The two viewings had about the same impact, chills and heart racing in all the same places. I did obviously have bigger criticisms about the film the second time, logically the film just seemed mostly fucking stupid. The ride and adventure of it all was still fun.
I'd see it again sometime in the next ten years.
I'd see it again sometime in the next ten years.
TheOnlyOneHeEverFeared
Member
Everest - It was pretty good. I was glad I didn't look up any sort of information about the expedition the book was based on before hand, cos it meant I was going in relatively blind, and the film was better for it. Didn't exactly blow my mind like other movies do on occasion, but it was very good indeed.
Fallout-NL
Member
Would have been better with less talk, yeah. Like All is Lost.
ive seen Whiplash recently and have to say its one of the best movies ive seen this year. And JK Simmons is just killing it.
Ive also seen Jupiter Ascending and, honestly, I absolutely dont understand where all the hate is coming from. Its one of the best sapce operas ive ever seen (story is so-so but everything else is just incredible). Toi say it with this guys words:
Ive also seen Jupiter Ascending and, honestly, I absolutely dont understand where all the hate is coming from. Its one of the best sapce operas ive ever seen (story is so-so but everything else is just incredible). Toi say it with this guys words:
Given its origins, it's surprising to me that Yojimbo went so long without an American remake, given the relative that Kurosawa adaptations enjoyed in close proximity to their original releases, but it did finally happen and we got Last Man Standing out of it. If you've seen Yojimbo, there's really not much that's done differently from a story standpoint, but it's hard to ignore that the various additions, as they tend to draw away from the proceedings. There's a sense that this film died a death by a thousand notes, as there's a lot of telltale signs of a film that there was a lot of studio exec appeasement. Not enough female presence to draw in the date crowd? Throw in three thankless female roles that are functionally identical and equally pointless. Antagonists too scummy? Give one of them a twisted backstory mired in good intentions that adds nothing to the film, other than giving the usually underappreciated David Patrick Kelly a little more screen time. Story too hard to follow for Joe Sixpack? Give Bruce Willis five bucks to record a voice-over that compares favorably to Harrison Ford's in the theatrical cut of Blade Runner. It's a lot of little stuff like that conspiring to muck up a fine story and group of characters, and it sadly succeeds at doing that too often. Even poor Christopher Walken, in a delightfully nutty role that's as big a 180 from the same position that Tatsuya Nakadai played in the original, feels compromised, as if the mere presence of Walken was enough to make up for how thin and insubstantial his wily enforcer character winds up feeling. There are definitely elements of a great adaptation here, and it's hard to fault Walter Hill's visual styling and Ry Cooder's effective score as being detriments in any way, but even at more than 30 years late to the party, Last Man Standing can't help but feel like an also-ran that only had being able to officially credit the screenplay for Yojimbo as its source material. It's the kind of mediocre film I like the least: the one that had no business being as bland as it should not have been.
Fancy Clown
Member
Exactly. Compare the over the top racist cop in the beginning of Dawn, to...well almost any scene (especially the amazing ending) in Night. It's like night and day badum ch. Probably what gives Night that wonderfully subtle subtext is because Dwayne's character was not written specifically for a black actor, but the role takes on so many new dimensions due to its casting. I still love Dawn and Day, but Night is the only one that is chilling. Sure it can seem goofy and dated, but that's sort of a meaningless criticism you can throw at a lot of older movies. Disliking an old thing because it's old doesn't make much sense to me.
Insane Metal
Member
I watched Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials, I really enjoyed it.
I was also positively surprised by Jupiter Ascending. After all the bad reviews my expectations were rock bottom, so that might be a factor. But this quote about the Marvel movies really has a lot of truth in it.
vinnygambini
Why are strippers at the U.N. bad when they're great at strip clubs???
Saw the film yesterday The Maze Runner: Scorch Trials (Yah for cheapy Tuesdays in Canada!).
It's terrible, goodness gracious. The plot doesn't make any sense. The film was oddly paced, too long for what it had to offer, and the script (scenario) was just laughable:
I'm so disappointed. Luckily the cinematography is great, but you will get out of the film feeling like you've seen a Transformers film but without the robots...
It's terrible, goodness gracious. The plot doesn't make any sense. The film was oddly paced, too long for what it had to offer, and the script (scenario) was just laughable:
There's a new character in the film, Brenda, played by Rosa Salazar, and she discloses to Thomas, Dylan O'Brien, that he reminds her of her lost brother and yet....drumroll.
She kisses him earlier in the film. Who though of this shit?
She kisses him earlier in the film. Who though of this shit?
I'm so disappointed. Luckily the cinematography is great, but you will get out of the film feeling like you've seen a Transformers film but without the robots...
Cipher Peon
Banned
I don't dislike it because it's old (Rosemary's Baby was released the same year and it's my 11th favorite movie ever), but I don't have a problem with those who do. People have different tastes and have lower patience for older media that doesn't have modern conventions. And that's perfectly understandable.
I dislike it because I think it's mega boring and when things happen it's because someone makes a stupid decision or is literally a useless brick. At least my second viewing was made more enjoyable due to heckling. I never found Night or Dawn remotely chilling, but Dawn has a huge scope, fun and likable characteristics, an amazing setting, and has a plot that progresses with characters that have plans. It's a much more dynamic film than Night, and I've lived every viewing of Dawn.
Also lastly, I'm not trying to make objective criticisms (because they don't exist). Just talking about my subject times at the movies!
Fancy Clown
Member
I think insubstantial criticism, like calling something dated as a negative without any qualifiers or using that as a platform for critique, is absolutely fair game for being called out on (not calling you or anyone out on this specifically, the dated thing was just a general grievance). Just because something isn't objective doesn't mean it can't be engaged or criticized.
As far as your problems with Night go, I don't very much don't share them. All the things you say are negatives: the useless brick character (I assume you mean Barbara?), characters making stupid decisions, and too static, for me elevate the film into the bottle of tension it is. Barbara is a brick because she is suffering PSTD after witnessing her brother being murdered by a member of the living dead, it's believable for her to have snapped like this and it's a real problem for Ben--who is our protagonist, and really the only reasonable character here--because he needs cooperation to survive. This is further complicated by the family in the basement, who are obviously problematic in their survival strategies and personality, which again raises the tension because we want Ben to survive, and if he's going to he has to co-operate with this bunch. Being trapped in the enclosed farm house adds to the tension because it's just him and them (with obvious racial undertones), and the thin walls keeping the undead at bay.
The ending was perfect as well. It brings the racial themes to a disturbing level, and there's a fantastic and dreadful sense of irony that Ben, having survived the living dead (in the place he thought wouldn't work) is ended up being killed by the very people who are ostensibly coming to save him.
It's the most chilling of the trilogy for a number of reasons. The bleak ending, the gritty black and white photography, the racial subtext, the scene with the daughter and the garden trowel, and the zombies in this are the most frightening they've ever been. In dawn they are colorful ghouls with distinct personalities. In Night they are blank voids, and all look like they were real people...but something is off about them. And like the horror in the birds, every time they look out the window, more of them are gathered.
That's not to say I don't love Dawn as well. It's easy to see the appeal. It has a larger scope, purposefully likable characters (as its less about internal tensions than external--which again I think makes it less uncomfortable, but perhaps more emotional), lots of set-pieces and action and humor. Some days I prefer Dawn, but overall I think Night of the Living Dead remains more effective than its siblings. Yes it's older, and has a fraction of the budget, but I think its subtext remains even more relevant and frightening. Where Dawn's blatant consumers are zombies theme is already feeling a little rusty in the 21st century, Night's racially charged subtext in a situation that demands cooperation against an ever-present existential threat is something that I think is prevailing feeling in much of the world today.
Count Dookkake
Member
Also, if you are known to be a live-blogger, your opinion is worthless.
ViewtifulJC
Banned
live tweet, even worse
Cipher Peon
Banned
Oh, of course. Apologies if I implied otherwise. I'm so used to people acting like butts because other people don't experience media the same way they do or because they feel that certain works are "objectively good" and if you don't like them you're wrong that I instinctively go on the defense.
By useless brick I meant both Barbara and the girlfriend who got the sensible guy killed. I actually think Babs is super fascinating because of how useless she is. The movie really goes out of its way to emphasize that she's literally more helpful when being knocked out than conscious. I call it enjoying it ironically because I find it hysterical, but it really is unforgettable. It's not the most socially progressive sentiment and I feel bad about finding it amusing, but it's a product of its time.
Similarly, I find the ending to be unforgettable. I don't like it at all because of how anticlimactic it is and it just peters out the film with a feeling like absolutely nothing of interest happened to the film. In the theater, the audience I was with reacted to it with a mix of "Wow"s and laughter with some clapping. I don't think the ending aged well at all. It's meaningful in the context of the film, but it's hard to not feel cheated at the end of it.
Glad you can see why I love Dawn, even though I dislike Night. Haven't seen any of the other films in the franchise, but I plan on watching Day and the Dawn remake soon for October.
I do it because I love it. Not going to apologize for it.
I don't feel that dismissing people for how they choose to enjoy media the most is cool at all.
BaronLundi
Member
I for one enjoy reading books while playing video games, ironing and browsing tumblr. Most books I've read really were boring though.
Cipher Peon
Banned
I know you're being sarcastic, but who am I to judge how you read books? If that's your preference, then more power to you! But if you're finding them boring, then you should experiment with how you approach experiencing media.
Whatever it takes to maximize your enjoyment of media, friend. My way works for me, yours for you.
BaronLundi
Member
I enjoy reading books by just reading books and watching movies by just watching movies. I'm pretty sure it's actually the only way to approach them.
But you're free to do whatever you want however you want it (save from you talking to your friends and live tweeting in the same theater as me in which case all bets are off). The way you describe it you are simply not watching the movies you think you're watching.
Discotheque
Banned
i think live-tweeting on your phone and all that shit is alright if you're in the back row and all the people you're with are somehow fine with that. but if you're in front of me and I see that (after I ask to stop) half my drink is gonna 'fall' on your head.
i've had a few bad dates too because of my screen intolerance lol
i've had a few bad dates too because of my screen intolerance lol
Cipher Peon
Banned
Oh good lord, no! I don't livetweet in theaters. That's incredibly disrespectful. When I go to the theater, I go there for the explicit and sole purpose of enjoying the film and the company I bring (which means either whispering to each other or cuddling, depending on the person and film). I pay a premium for the theater experience.i think live-tweeting on your phone and all that shit is alright if you're in the back row and all the people you're with are somehow fine with that. but if you're in front of me and I see that (after I ask to stop) half my drink is gonna 'fall' on your head.
i've had a few bad dates too because of my screen intolerance lol
But when I'm at home (and to a lesser extent a casual screening like the Night of the Living Dead one), yeah, I'll do things that I enjoy in the meantime.
But no. Not in the theater. That's awful.
Charles Foster Kane
Rosebud
is this some parody I'm not aware of?
TheKaeptain
Banned
Do you remember that one time on my old twitter account when I live tweeted me getting a BJ?
John Dunbar
correct about everything
livetweeting/blogging is acceptable if it's a movie you have already seen and you're doing some kind of commentary for it (although why anyone would care is of course another matter), but if you livetweet a movie you are watching for the first time then you are most definitely a horrible human being.
- Status