Eric Apricot's "Explain One Play" on last night's climactic plays.
The LeBron-to-Korver play developed out of an attempt to get Curry switched on to LeBron, but the Dubs pre-switched away from that so Dray ended up on Bron. Pretty smart move IMO because the pre-switch happened as the triple screen was developing, so everyone was clustered up. Curry's subsequent switch away from JR and to Korver was a good move in theory but semi-dangerous just because of how far he and Iggy had to go to make that.
Meanwhile, KD was nominally guarding Love but was also
2.9'ing it in the paint. He was fractions of a second from having to leave the paint for a step before LeBron drove in, keeping his position legal, but then again the shot clock was winding down and I'm sure he knew LeBron had to make a move. This left Curry to front Love, not ideal, and Love smartly converted that into a screen for Korver, but Curry spun around. For Love's role here, I think the only nitpick you could have is that he could have maybe tried a little bit more holding on Curry to get Korver even more open, but that's a narrow line to walk; no one wants to be the scapegoat who lost a key possession on a dumb offensive foul.
Also, Dray's one on one defense here was really solid. Maybe a slightly reckless half-gamble for the steal but he recovered before LeBron could take advantage, and after all, they're 30+ feet out; Bron's not gonna take a shot from that far out.
Finally - yes, Curry managed to sort of contest Korver's shot, but Korver is a great, great shooter and I think it was passing it to Korver was the right move.
How was that not a foul by IIguodala in the final possession with Lebron on the baseline 3? It was clear as day.
Under NBA rules, when the ball is in the hands, "the hand is part of the ball". You can't slap the wrist or forearm, that's a foul, but swiping at the ball, including the hand, is legal.