• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Next-Gen PS5 & XSX |OT| Console tEch threaD

Status
Not open for further replies.

FunkMiller

Banned
Ok, again. The IO performance of the series x is not even touched. That shows the video of the ~500Mb/s external SSD above.
Old games load compressed packets into memory. PS5 won't change that for old games. Those packets than must get decompressed by various decompression algorithms on the CPU (not the fixed function hardware the new consoles have). And now here is the bottleneck. The new CPUs are much faster than those from the current gen, but not that much faster. So for loading the old packets, the CPU is no the bottleneck instead of the IO. You could also see that by using an SSD with the xbox one (x) or PS4. The way faster IO of the external/internal SSD was not even touched even there the CPU were the limiting factor.
I really expect the loading speed for BC games on the PS4 to be more or less the same. The CPU should be on full speed (at least in boost mode) and the IO of the even faster SSD won't do much more. You can already see that in that video. Internal SSD of the xbox series x 10.11s, external (that is at least limited by the USB connection to around 500MB/s) 10.77s. So at best, PS5 BC loading times get 0.5s better.

Okay, but again... we’ve been told a lot of stuff about SSDs and speedy loading... this does not demonstrate that.

On a much happier note, Sekiro looked bloody marvellous.
 

Kerlurk

Banned
Is it just me... or is it incredibly ironic that the first hands-on stuff we get from the company touting “The World’s Most Powerful Console” is literally just showing last gen games with fast load times and quick resume?? Weren’t all the Xbox execs and fanboys talking about how the PS5 SSD is stupid because nobody cares if games load faster??

My prediction is Sony is doing their own thing (like they’ve been doing this whole time) and will have actual next-gen games running on PS5s once the NDAs drop.. They’re gonna continue to focus and SHOW real next-gen games—not 3-7 year old titles loading faster for a first hands-on video.....

Not only that, MS has already shown us "fast" load times and quick resume. Which is great, and I'm not criticizing those features.

They have shown nothing else about their OS or am I wrong about that?

And yet people complain that Sony has not shown their OS, which I believe they are keeping under wraps as long as possible, as they have some unique features, that they don't want MS to to start jerry rigging into their OS at the last minute (probably would take a week or two at least to put in some placeholder feature), so they can claim, they had this feature also on day 1. Yes, my take on why Sony is holding off showing the OS so far.
 
Last edited:

Neo Blaster

Member
it would be nice if you would draw the right conclusions
This just mean, that IO is no longer relevant.
The guy in this video actually shows that


The external SSD can also load BC games as fast as the internal SSD, just because IO is no longer the bottleneck. This won't change with PS5 for BC games. The problem for BC games is now the CPU. And guess what the PC in the Video has (I can tell you without viewing it), the PC has a faster CPU.

btw, in your video @Dodkrake :
i7-8700 CPU,
1920 x 1080, 60Hz ... so I guess not even the 4k assets of the game.

You're saying the CPU is the bottleneck now, but aren't current gen games compressed with zlib? Isn't VA's hardware decompression block supposed to perform this task instead of the CPU?
 

SlimySnake

Flashless at the Golden Globes
Alright, so this is an example of bad journalism. Ryan McCaffrey says cold boot for xsx is 10-12 seconds. Well, the video he posted does not support that. its actually 20 seconds for the cold boot.

Timestamped: 1:46 to 2:06. is my math bad or does this not add up to 10-12 seconds?


Of course this got a thread on era with the title saying that IGN reported that cold boot is 10-12 seconds.
 

Bojanglez

The Amiga Brotherhood
Not only that, MS has already shown us "fast" load times and quick resume. Which is great, and I'm not criticizing those features.

They have shown nothing else about their OS or am I wrong about that?

And yet people complain that Sony has not shown their OS, which I believe they are keeping under wraps as long as possible, as they have some unique features, that they don't want MS to to start jerry rigging into their OS at the last minute (probably would take a week or two at least to put in some placeholder feature), so they can claim, they had this feature also on day 1. Yes, my take on why Sony is holding off showing the OS so far.
I expect you're right about them nor wanting MS to start copying them. Then again it took them 7 years to get remote play working, so it might be an unwarranted concern.
 

Kerlurk

Banned
Alright, so this is an example of bad journalism. Ryan McCaffrey says cold boot for xsx is 10-12 seconds. Well, the video he posted does not support that. its actually 20 seconds for the cold boot.

Timestamped: 1:46 to 2:06. is my math bad or does this not add up to 10-12 seconds?


Of course this got a thread on era with the title saying that IGN reported that cold boot is 10-12 seconds.


Cold boots are not just about SSD speed. The hardware does an initializing check of hardware components, and that is usually what slows the boot time.

Anyway, who cold boots? 99% of the time, I'm booting from sleep on my PS4 Pro.
 
Last edited:
Alright, so this is an example of bad journalism. Ryan McCaffrey says cold boot for xsx is 10-12 seconds. Well, the video he posted does not support that. its actually 20 seconds for the cold boot.

Timestamped: 1:46 to 2:06. is my math bad or does this not add up to 10-12 seconds?


Of course this got a thread on era with the title saying that IGN reported that cold boot is 10-12 seconds.


2:06 - 1:46 = 20 seconds

20 seconds - 6 seconds = 14 seconds

14 seconds - 4 seconds OR 2 seconds respectively will give you 10-12 seconds

This is how Ryan got to that figure.

To summarise, Ryan McCaffrey made it up
 

Allandor

Member
You're saying the CPU is the bottleneck now, but aren't current gen games compressed with zlib? Isn't VA's hardware decompression block supposed to perform this task instead of the CPU?
You use various compression techs on current gen. If you have fixed function hardware it can normally only understand stuff, that is specially made for it. So you can't use any zip-container to decompress that. So they just can't "emulate" this stuff and use the hardware for the game. E.g. you can't use the PS5 decomporession block do decompress other stuff. The "stuff" musst be compressed with special compression algorithms, else it just won't work via hardware. That is a weakness of the fixed function route. It is really fast and energy efficient but if you change the algorithm just a bit, it won't work (not without using the CPU). This makes absolute sense in a console, but is also the reason why we don't have fixed function decompression hardware in our PC CPUs yet. Algorithms get better and better over time, but if you have the algorithm in hardware, it can't change that much. So a normal PC uses the CPU which make it much more dynamic and you can always use the best-case algorithm for the time.
 
Last edited:

DrDamn

Member
I think the quick resume feature for the xbox is by far their best feature, its a nice game-changer for players,

I really hope that it will be supported by a lot of developers, its a tangible difference that you can personally see or feel. Easy of use or quality of life improvement. I really like changes like that.

It doesn't need to be supported by devs does it? It just works with everything. You'll get network interruptions for silly online SP games that insist you log in to play, but it should just work. Given the focus shown so far it is really useful for B/C titles. A quick resume into RDR2 would be just 6-8 seconds wouldn't it? For next gen title you'd think it might actual be quicker to cold boot straight into the game section you want to play (SP/MP etc).
 

xacto

Member
Either i have set my expectations way higher than i should or i have bought into the power of these next gen consoles a little bit to much.

I am really unhappy about those load times and it really makes me worry about ps5 ones.

We see what happens in the future but after today i am bummed out.

Same for me, we might have had higher expectations and we set ourselves out for disappointment. But again, I am not exactly a tech head, so...

We will see, but I am a bit let down by those loading times myself.
 

SlimySnake

Flashless at the Golden Globes
Cold boots are not just about SSD speed. The hardware does an initializing check of hardware components, and that is usually what slows the boot time.

Anyway, who cold boots? 99% of the time, I'm booting from sleep on my PS4 Pro.
thats not my point though. his claim is patently false. he has video evidence and he is simply lying about it. you gotta do better than that as a games journalist.
 

martino

Member
I have a feeling these today loading tests will be create a big backslash to Xbox when Sony shows their side...
imo this will end up to be two completely opposed strategy :
showing worst on one hand vs showing best on the other
 
Last edited:

LED Guy?

Banned
Oh wow LMAO!! So now Xbox Series X supports 500 games of BC games throughout Original Xbox, Xbox 360 and Xbox One, JUST 500, so that means that it won't anywhere near support all games of Xbox One.

While PS5 will support 99% of PS4 games, over 4000 of them, so now PS5 is superior when it comes to BC.

 

FunkMiller

Banned
Today is a very bad Day and a very good day at the same time.

Bad, that @Bo_hazam got banned for two weeks. "lollipop_disappointed:

Good, this Thread is now all MINE :messenger_heart:

Oh no. We can’t let all that power go to your head.

Join me friends... we must form the NFRL (NeoGAF Fish Resistance League) to fight this evil dictator.

$1 for your first month’s subscription, followed by $12.99. 48 month contract.
 

Kerlurk

Banned
we see a lot of people using xbox series x and none from sony. The question is: Why sony didn't provide the PS5 to the media? what are they afraid of?

This post is equivalent to a Sony fan asking why MS has shown no next generation games running on XSX. :rolleyes:

What are they afraid of?

Why should Sony be afraid. They currently outsell the Xbox three to one. <-- Ahh, now I see why the Xbox was called the XBox One because they get outsold by the competition three to one!
 
Last edited:

Mr Moose

Member
Man, if the SSD in the PS5 also has more than 100 GB reserved for its OS and other stuff, then we’re left with… what, 700GB? Less? And the actual available space is usually less than the officially stated size of hard drives anyway, even without OS reservations. For all we know we might end up with 600-650 GB that we can actually use. That’s going to be pretty tight. Would be better if the PS5 had a separate piece of internal flash memory, reserved exclusively for the OS.
Now imagine the Series S :messenger_weary: It's even less. Good thing we can swap shit out onto externals, because fuck paying $230 for a 1TB card.
 
Oh wow LMAO!! So now Xbox Series X supports 500 games of BC games throughout Original Xbox, Xbox 360 and Xbox One, JUST 500, so that means that it won't anywhere near support all games of Xbox One.

While PS5 will support 99% of PS4 games, over 4000 of them, so now PS5 is superior when it comes to BC.


So uh who the feck is this and why should we believe it?
 

Entroyp

Member
There's some serious bottleneck going on VA, even on the slower SSD speed(2.4GB/s RAW) it would take 6.7s to fill the ENTIRE memory. Isn't the hardware decompression block being used?

I’m pretty sure old games won’t use it, unless patched of course.

But, PS4 games shouldn’t be able to use the custom hardware on PS5 either, basically the CPU will handle everything while on legacy mode, so I wouldn’t expect those to load much faster either.
 

Nickolaidas

Member
Cool preview. A lot of stuff we already knew from Microsoft themselves, but nice that it is being verified by media outlets. Those faster load times for BC games are nice, expect PS5 to be even faster, but the performance of the games... Steady 60fps, and auto-HDR.


Yeah, I don't think you understand how BC works. These games weren't build for the XSX. Do you expect the PS5 to load RDR2 in 10sec maybe? Because if so, please say this now. What do you expect from the PS5?
And just like that, my fear for BC has been realized. And I'm willing to bet those 0.8 seconds it took for Spider-Man to load was a fully re-worked version of the Spider-Man game, not mere BC in action (granted, we haven't yet seen the PS5 in action with BC games, but I'm willing to bet it'll be the same logic). Games which are not built from the ground up to take advantage of an SSD (like Ratchet and Demon's Souls on the PS5) will still take considerable time to load.

50 seconds for RDR2 ... what a fucking disappointment.
 

SSfox

Member
Glad he acknowledged this point even if in a new tweet.



Yeah, i mean a friend told me back in 2014 "my PS4 is quite", then i learned sometimes after he bought it with Knack, Once Bloodborne and Witcher 3 released this was an entire different story haha

I won't believe this quite thing until i see it running a very hardware pushing game, and this goes for both PS5 and XSX. Tho i think (hope) things will be better than current gen considering what they done in the matter.
 

VargasPaPuM

Member
This post is equivalent to a Sony fan asking why MS has shown no next generation games running on XSX. :rolleyes:

What are they afraid of?

Why should Sony be afraid. They currently outsell the Xbox three to one. <-- Ahh, now I see why the Xbox was called the XBox One because they get outsold by the competition three to one!
giphy-downsized-large.gif
 
I can see this happening, multiple reveals and events covering backwards compatibility, a full preview of the console UI and its new features. Preview of the SSD and the insane load times on both current and next-gen titles. Hardware breakdown of the console showing the cooling system and it's capabilities (I'm hoping it's whisper quiet) and an overview of the APU.

We don't need another event. Just do a youtube video. Casuals don't care about more events look at the viewing numbers of second show. The numbers are down. Just do a basic youtube will do.No more event crap please.

Not only that, MS has already shown us "fast" load times and quick resume. Which is great, and I'm not criticizing those features.

They have shown nothing else about their OS or am I wrong about that?

And yet people complain that Sony has not shown their OS, which I believe they are keeping under wraps as long as possible, as they have some unique features, that they don't want MS to to start jerry rigging into their OS at the last minute (probably would take a week or two at least to put in some placeholder feature), so they can claim, they had this feature also on day 1. Yes, my take on why Sony is holding off showing the OS so far.

Agreed. This whole gen Xbox spent their time copying the PS5 UI. Its no wonder Sony started again. Playstation want a complete distinction between itself & teh comp. Its brilliant how PS just doesn't acknowledge Xbox. Move at their own pace.
 
Last edited:

FunkMiller

Banned
Oh wow LMAO!! So now Xbox Series X supports 500 games of BC games throughout Original Xbox, Xbox 360 and Xbox One, JUST 500, so that means that it won't anywhere near support all games of Xbox One.

While PS5 will support 99% of PS4 games, over 4000 of them, so now PS5 is superior when it comes to BC.



Honest question: do most people really gives two fucks about BC? Or how many games from previous gens a next gen console can play?

This is why I find it so weird that Xbox are highlighting BC just a few weeks from launch, when they should be showcasing new games to get people to buy those XSSs that haven’t sold yet.
 
Last edited:

Mr Moose

Member
Oh wow LMAO!! So now Xbox Series X supports 500 games of BC games throughout Original Xbox, Xbox 360 and Xbox One, JUST 500, so that means that it won't anywhere near support all games of Xbox One.

While PS5 will support 99% of PS4 games, over 4000 of them, so now PS5 is superior when it comes to BC.


 

SlimySnake

Flashless at the Golden Globes
This is according to that video from Engadget I think, and here we have another one who couldn't test the games he wanted.

But it is iffy, we'll see if they're true or not.


I dont understand tom warren here. if ms is testing those games then fine, let them. whats stopping you from putting your copy of games in the xsx?

I really dont understand why BC is so hard. these consoles are basically PCs now. that was the whole point of going with AMD GCN and x86 architectures. this should just work. no testing required. after all, you dont test PC games do you.

This has me worried about PS5 now. I hope MS clarifies this later today.
 

LED Guy?

Banned
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom