HAL-01
Member
For f shake. Please not again
This was already posted before, it's an edited clip from yongyea's review with the volume levels turned up the wazoo
For f shake. Please not again
A while ago that Moore's law is dead guy said that part of the Xbox's computing power was reserved for azure, or something to the like. I have no clue how that would work
I really appreciate his insight, but I'm honestly not sure why he comes in here. I've only been around a wee bit, but every time he responds people come out of the woodwork to attack him.
He's a Geordie, man. T-shirts in December, cheesy chips for every meal. Takes more than a messageboard to take that lad down.I really appreciate his insight, but I'm honestly not sure why he comes in here. I've only been around a wee bit, but every time he responds people come out of the woodwork to attack him.
He's a Geordie, man. T-shirts in December, cheesy chips for every meal. Takes more than a messageboard to take that lad down.
I mean I don't think it sounds bad, you simply cannot go around this, when you need to spin disc at x angle speed to reach particular data rate....This was already posted before, it's an edited clip from yongyea's review with the volume levels turned up the wazoo
Thank goodness, we dont want yanky tearing game to be praised and everyone needs a new TV to enjoy the game without cutting my eyeballs.
Tearing and bad frame rates cannot be acceptable by having to use a freesync monitor or a new TV with that feature, these are consoles.
They did not. Gonna need some proof here bud.They recently released a patch to uncap the frame rate in quality mode!
So a mega corporation didn't lie in their mass marketing, shocking. Nice FUD attempt tho, half of you guys had your dicks out
So a mega corporation didn't lie in their mass marketing, shocking. Nice FUD attempt tho, half of you guys had your dicks out
Thank goodness, we dont want yanky tearing game to be praised and everyone needs a new TV to enjoy the game without cutting my eyeballs.
Tearing and bad frame rates cannot be acceptable by having to use a freesync monitor or a new TV with that feature, these are consoles.
Lower.No no every Xbox is suddenly turned into a VRR compatible TV.
I can't wait for these videos, watching a stream on SX looks like it drops to 50 fps on some cutscenes, resolution drops badly, my guess? 1600p or so.
Should have been quiet & let the game come out, celebrating victories ahead of time now enjoy what's to come.
![]()
The Sony Picture shows the warehouse of Indiana Jones 4, right?
keram
![]()
Hangar 51
"Everyday[sic] powerful artifacts are being discovered by people who have no idea what to do with them. Something has to be done." ―Man in suit[src] Hangar 51 was a United States military installation located in Nevada. Officially a storage facility for replacement B-series aircraft parts...indianajones.fandom.com
So a mega corporation didn't lie in their mass marketing, shocking. Nice FUD attempt tho, half of you guys had your dicks out
Playstation 5 review: 'If the PS4 was greatness awaits, the PS5 is greatness realised'
By Jordan Middler // BBC The Social contributor // 9 November 2020
It's 4 lanes PCIE 3.0 or 2 lanes PCIE 4.0. Both at same maximum theorical speed 3.94GB/s.
I guess the internal SSD is pcie 3.0 because it's cheaper than 2 lanes pcie 4.0. But doesn't matter.
Lower.
So a mega corporation didn't lie in their mass marketing, shocking. Nice FUD attempt tho, half of you guys had your dicks out
So a mega corporation didn't lie in their mass marketing, shocking. Nice FUD attempt tho, half of you guys had your dicks out
There is patch from what I removed.Patch last month, it was around the web
Can I use that pic? I'm already using before your reply
It's seems to be the ps4 version based of other youtubers (Greg Miller from kinda funny said it was) and the following:
Only if you photoshop in a big Mod of War rating of 20/10.Can I use that pic? I'm already using before your reply![]()
So a mega corporation didn't lie in their mass marketing, shocking. Nice FUD attempt tho, half of you guys had your dicks out
According to Western Digital, the Xbox Series X's WD SN530 SSD isn't a stock OEM drive that's limited to PCIe Gen3 x4 performance. Instead, the drive has been outfitted with a special ASIC that enables both PCIe Gen3 x4 and Gen4 x2 performance
They are still calling FUD in the thread.Just as I suspected yesterday then. I'm not sure why yourself and many other Xbox fans have angrily called FUD, though? I personally just commented about how it doesn't seem to be an elegant solution given the time MS say they have been working on integrating a SSD into a console (I called it a hodgepodge!) but in the end it is all irrelevant when the damn drive is specced to 2.4GB/s anyway, way within Gen3 speeds!
Edit - Seems like the PCI-E 4.0 has a increase in clock.*Does some quick math*
That's the same thing, 4GBs. 3.0 x1 = 1GBs (right?) 4.0 x1 = 2GBs?
Yes, that's right. The only reason to use 2 lanes instead of 4 is, that 2 lanes are much simpler to route and is enough for their desired speed target. It is as simple as that. Just to reduce the cost a bit more with things, they just don't need.*Does some quick math*
That's the same thing, 4GBs. 3.0 x1 = 1GBs (right?) 4.0 x1 = 2GBs?
So a mega corporation didn't lie in their mass marketing, shocking. Nice FUD attempt tho, half of you guys had your dicks out
No it was not true, but don't let reality stand in your way. That whole thread is about it being Gen 3 which it is clearly not.They are still calling FUD in the thread.
It was nice to see the previous teardown was indeed true.
According to Western Digital, the Xbox Series X's WD SN530 SSD isn't a stock OEM drive that's limited to PCIe Gen3 x4 performance. Instead, the drive has been outfitted with a special ASIC that enables both PCIe Gen3 x4 and Gen4 x2 performance, which allows for up to 3.938 GB of max throughput. For reference, the Series X targets 2.4GB/sec in uncompressed data transfers.
Yes, the Xbox Series X's internal SSD is indeed custom, and it is a PCIe 4.0 enabled drive. We apologize for publishing wrong information and for any issues or confusion this has caused.
Read more: https://www.tweaktown.com/news/7613...as-custom-asic-to-support-pcie-4-0/index.html
It was very true.No it was not true, but don't let reality stand in your way. That whole thread is about it being Gen 3 which it is clearly not.
I think there won't be any limitation because physical lanes for PCI-E 3.0 and PCI-E 4.0 are the same... what changes is the protocol of PCI-E to travel the date that is optimized to archive the double of data traveling (basically they use compressions).I've got bad news for you this news confirms
1. This is a PCIe gen 3 drive customised to interface to a reduced PCIe 4 interface
2. it won't achieve 2.4Gb/s sustained. It'll be about 1.9gb/s.
The article you linked included what many had theorised
" special ASIC that enables bothPCIe Gen3 x4 and Gen4 x2"
They've mapped the default drive's x4 gen 3 lanes to x2 gen 4 lanes. That's the same overall bandwidth.
Unfortunately by implication this confirms it's a stock unit in terms of its bandwidth which means the benchmarks for it are also confirmed.
https://www.notebookcheck.net/WDC-PC-SN530-SDBPNPZ-1T00-SSD-Benchmarks.476624.0.html
Why are you ignoring the article and comment from WD which clearly says the opposite?It was very true.
The previous teardown showed a WD SN530... today teardown of retail units shows a WD SN530.
So much for FUD and debunked lol
If you can wait at least 2 minutes to enter in the menu screen I can clock a match for you....How long does it take on PS4?