• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Next-gen Racing Graphics Face-off | (Next-gen means current-gen)

K

KORNdoggy

Member
Yiazmat said:
Looks just like the real one tho...

klkkydudh.jpg


klkll11utp.jpg
Click to expand...

wow! i didn't realize it was so accurate. that just makes forza's look even worse. it's like they have a general "leather" texture and stick it on everything leather with no care as to whether the grain scaling is accurate to that vehicle or not.
 
D

deoee

Member
KORNdoggy said:
wow! i didn't realize it was so accurate. that just makes forza's look even worse. it's like they have a general "leather" texture and stick it on everything leather with no care as to whether the grain scaling is accurate to that vehicle or not.
Click to expand...

Yeah the leather def. is a bad looker in Forza.

Don't know why they wouldn't make it shader based but instead apply a texture.
 
F

FlutterPuffs

Member
KORNdoggy said:
wow! i didn't realize it was so accurate. that just makes forza's look even worse. it's like they have a general "leather" texture and stick it on everything leather with no care as to whether the grain scaling is accurate to that vehicle or not.
Click to expand...

Well yeah, it's one of Polyphony's strength... and weakness.

That's the accuracy 6 months of modelling of ONE car can do.
 
M

MaDKaT

Member
PritheeBeCareful said:
Shit... I had to do a double take then as I couldn't tell which one was the real one. Honestly, I don't think most people could.
Click to expand...

GTs model is still too smooth. In real life the texture actually sits between the Forza and GT model(Test drove one a while back). There is a fair amount of blur that is hiding it in the real pic.Though I would take the smoother look over that of whatever Forza is using. A lot of cars in the game have overly pronounced texturing.
 
G

GeordieMark

Member
psn said:
Well this is a thread where we compare graphics.
Click to expand...

Sorry, are graphics not graphics when in motion? These games are intended to be viewed in motion, so the poster has a point.

Personally, I'd rather devs use the limited resources at their disposal to make the games look good while I'm playing them, rather than wasting their time creating ultra life-like tree models that can only be seen by stopping dead off the track, so that they can be used in pointless fanboy arguments by a tiny minority of players.
 
Self_Destructive

Self_Destructive

Member
Yea, well a game with ~180 cars should have details that good. And it's not surprising when said developer spends their time working on scapes instead of more tracks and things like campaign modes.

But hey, them pictures will look great!
 
K

KORNdoggy

Member
GeordieMark said:
These games are intended to be viewed in motion
Click to expand...

they also include photo modes which means they're also intended to be viewed as static images. and photomodes mean a game needs to hold up to scrutiny even with incidental track-side details or interiors. do tree's looking like shit in forza matter in regards to gemeplay? no. are they a valid point of discussion in regards to visuals? yes. as the guy said, we're in a graphics thread. that's what people are discussing.

Remij said:
Yea, well a game with ~180 cars should have details that good. And it's not surprising when said developer spends their time working on scapes instead of more tracks and things like campaign modes.

But hey, them pictures will look great!
Click to expand...

oh look, someone else who's incapable of understanding we're in a graphics comparison thread. lol
 
G

Gaenor

Banned
Remij said:
Yea, well a game with ~180 cars should have details that good. And it's not surprising when said developer spends their time working on scapes instead of more tracks and things like campaign modes.

But hey, them pictures will look great!
Click to expand...

You’re aware this is a graphics thread, right ?
 
O

onQ123

Member
Remij said:
Yea, well a game with ~180 cars should have details that good. And it's not surprising when said developer spends their time working on scapes instead of more tracks and things like campaign modes.

But hey, them pictures will look great!
Click to expand...

GTS has you some kinda bitter lol
 
K

KORNdoggy

Member
Remij said:
Was there something wrong with what I said? I mean, REALLY read what I wrote.



You too..
Click to expand...

i REALLY read what you wrote, you're comparing content and gameplay modes...in a graphics thread. make whatever excuses you like about one game being better looking than another, but this thread isn't the place for it.
 
G

Gestault

Member
Yeah, as much as I know other aspects of these games mean substantial differences to players, we're primarily discussing visuals/style/performance. The other stuff like amount of content or review numbers or sales shouldn't be the focus in the discussion. All things considered, ya'll have been good, but just making it clearer from the original purpose.
 
P

Psycho_Mantis

Banned
Yiazmat said:
Looks just like the real one tho...

klkkydudh.jpg


klkll11utp.jpg
Click to expand...

Can't beat GT when it comes to car modelling. A bit of improvement on the shaders and resolution and we've reached photorealism.

Remij said:
Yea, well a game with ~180 cars should have details that good. And it's not surprising when said developer spends their time working on scapes instead of more tracks and things like campaign modes.

But hey, them pictures will look great!
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
Self_Destructive

Self_Destructive

Member
KORNdoggy said:
i REALLY read what you wrote, you're comparing content and gameplay modes...in a graphics thread. make whatever excuses you like about one game being better looking than another, but this thread isn't the place for it.
Click to expand...

I'm saying it should look good because it was the focus.. before content. I never mentioned any other game. I'm not COMPARING the content and gameplay modes... I'm stating the lack of them makes it easier for the dev to focus on those things.
 
T

tlop53

Member
Remij said:
Yea, well a game with ~180 cars should have details that good. And it's not surprising when said developer spends their time working on scapes instead of more tracks and things like campaign modes.

But hey, them pictures will look great!
Click to expand...

aha damn
 
O

onQ123

Member
Remij said:
Seems I have you pretty bitter lol
Click to expand...

Far from it I'm just laughing at you & your bitterness lol

KORNdoggy said:
i REALLY read what you wrote, you're comparing content and gameplay modes...in a graphics thread. make whatever excuses you like about one game being better looking than another, but this thread isn't the place for it.
Click to expand...


Gestault said:
Yeah, as much as I know other aspects of these games mean substantial differences to players, we're primarily discussing visuals/style/performance. The other stuff like amount of content or review numbers or sales shouldn't be the focus in the discussion. All things considered, ya'll have been good, but just making it clearer from the original purpose.
Click to expand...

GTS would not look this good if it had to simulate powerful wind physics like Forza 7.
 
Self_Destructive

Self_Destructive

Member
onQ123 said:
Far from it I'm just laughing at you & your bitterness lol
Click to expand...

Actually, I'm sure you're bitter about me. Probably when Synth and I called you out for not being able to comprehend how gifs work and appear to make a game look better than it actually does in native resolution on your screen.

I don't expect much from you.
 
G

Gestault

Member
There's really, really no reason to get personal. Posting your own images or just example stuff is the best way to make a point. The more sincere the attempt, the better. Ignore the people being irrational about things.
 
O

onQ123

Member
Remij said:
Actually, I'm sure you're bitter about me. Probably when Synth and I called you out for not being able to comprehend how gifs work and appear to make a game look better than it actually does in native resolution on your screen.

I don't expect much from you.
Click to expand...


That's not how gifs work that's how smaller images work which can be done by just playing the game on a smaller screen.
 
B

Behlel

Member
Remij said:
Yea, well a game with ~180 cars should have details that good. And it's not surprising when said developer spends their time working on scapes instead of more tracks and things like campaign modes.

But hey, them pictures will look great!
Click to expand...
At least they're doing this by herself and aren't outsourcing nothing to other studios.
And since we're on a graphic thread a better modelling is a pro even if they've only 3 cars in the game.
 
I

icecold1983

Member
Remij said:
Actually, I'm sure you're bitter about me. Probably when Synth and I called you out for not being able to comprehend how gifs work and appear to make a game look better than it actually does in native resolution on your screen.

I don't expect much from you.
Click to expand...

You have no room to talk about anyone. You used a pic from an old gts beta to claim it has worse trees than forza
 
I

icecold1983

Member
Weve come full circle again. Happens everytime with gt vs forza. people should just accept that turn10 will likely never beat polyphony when it comes to visials
 
K

Kambing

Member
I’m on the phone, but straight up which one is the real one? Top or bottom? To me the bottom looks like GTS as the shift stick looks a bit off? But god damn I honestly can’t tell
 
T

TheAdmiester

Member
I thought I'd interrupt the whole GT vs Forza debate with something that neither of them have - reflections of dynamic objects. It's not my best shot (and I didn't keep the PNG copy, oops) but you can clearly see the DB11 is reflected in the Mustang.


37516478061_f492cafc09_o.jpg
 
P

PackAPunchedMick

Member
TheAdmiester said:
I thought I'd interrupt the whole GT vs Forza debate with something that neither of them have - reflections of dynamic objects. It's not my best shot (and I didn't keep the PNG copy, oops) but you can clearly see the DB11 is reflected in the Mustang.


37516478061_f492cafc09_o.jpg
Click to expand...

The cost of 60fps?

Is that shot from consoles?

Driveclub has this in abundance and it looks incredible.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

I want a next gen 3D "pre-rendered" background game ala old RE.
48
4K
SlimeGooGoo replied
  • Poll
GTA6: Beginning Of The Next Gaming Crash?
Opinion Business Analysis 2
83
5K
thicc_girls_are_teh_best replied
[IGN] Explaining – and Fixing – IGN's Face-Off Controversy
20
2K
March Climber replied
DF - Final Fantasy 7 Rebirth: PS5 Pro vs PS5 - A Vast Improvement At 60FPS
10 11 12 13 14
658
39K
TGO replied
CDPR wants to improve The Witcher 3 Next-Gen CPU core utilization & DX12 performance
39
5K
YeulEmeralda replied
Top Bottom