If you could think up 20 new relevant characters...
I have a hard time thinking of 5, though I guess that depends on your definition of "relevant".
If you could think up 20 new relevant characters...
Well yeah, but could we really get 20 great characters from 2005-2011?
Considering how much Jiggly is featured in merchandising, I'd consider that a kid who started even at Gen V would still recognize Jiggly. For Lucario, my point is that despite that, he is still popular and pulling him out is a bad move regardless of relevance. By that logic a lot of NES classic characters should be pulled out since their only ties is that they are there for retro factor and not relevancy.
My point with Mewtwo is that you can't make him super-special when compared to other similarly popular characters. It just doesn't work that way.
Has there been any info released or is everything still speculation?
True, it depends. Relevant could mean any current or future character with a release between Brawl and Smash Wii U or characters that have gain popularity through game releases. At this point, I don't know what to believe anymore.I have a hard time thinking of 5, though I guess that depends on your definition of "relevant".
That would be the surest way to make the game fail in sales.
Why is Geno so popular anyway? He shoots peas from his arm. Wow.
I really doubt that a remake released in the beginning of 2004 had any bearing on getting PT in or making him more "relevant" than he was before. And my point wasn't "oh hey, he didn't add in these characters to melee" it's that there doesn't seem to be any indication he wanted them in melee to begin with.
Just to be clear, you seem to be saying "if XYZ didn't get into BRAWL or wasn't planned for BRAWL via forbidden 7 then they don't stand a chance now" and I simply don't think that to be the case.
Ontop of that, no ... Sakurai wasn't given the "luxury" of having as much time as he wanted to do w/e he wanted (as seen with the forbidden 7). He was given more time than with Melee but clearly it wasn't something Nintendo would just let him pump however many years he wanted into.
Why is Geno so popular anyway? He shoots peas from his arm. Wow.
Actually, I was thinking of an idea kinda similar to this. This might have been brought up before - like hell I'm reading 100 pages to verify if it has, of course - but maybe have a game mode akin to Capcom's Vs. series, where you pick two fighters and swap them in/out in the middle of a fight to let the percentage of the other fighter "heal" (albeit only down to a certain point relative to when they went in). Alternatively, a mode more like Virtua Fighter 2's (and many other games', I'm sure) Team Battle, where you pick up to, say, five fighters in the order desired, and every time you lose a life you have to move on to the next fighter in the list, until all of a player's list is defeated.Why not just make Zelda's down B a tag in/tag out? Switch between Zelda and Impa.
Honestly they should introduce tag team in Smash.
Honestly they should introduce tag team in Smash.
Erm, I thought it's already in the game.
Honestly they should introduce tag team in Smash.
I can barely keep up with four people on the screen, honestly.
Well, with a tag team fight, there still would generally only be four people on-screen at a given time at most; it's just that those four would occasionally swap out for other characters, either so one can rest or because one was taken out.I can barely keep up with four people on the screen, honestly.
Mmm, right, I forgot about that - but this would be in the context of a normal match.It already exists in Subspace Emissary.
Choose your 3 guys. When you loose a stock, the next one spawns.
I can barely keep up with four people on the screen, honestly.
It already exists in Subspace Emissary.
Choose your 3 guys. When you loose a stock, the next one spawns.
Mmm, right, I forgot about that - but this would be in the context of a normal match.
Can somebody pm the recent rumor that has been circulating about from whatever sketchy source that it is. I'm curious.
Can somebody pm the recent rumor that has been circulating about from whatever sketchy source that it is. I'm curious.
Yeah, I'm just saying that's how it would work.
To some degree, sure, but there's always the new generation that has never heard of the game, too.smash bros "lifers" sell the games, not lucas, wolf, ike, etc.
It's not even just that, I do remember Sakurai commenting on how the Wii's HW was a limitation as well. He also stated that with the new HW he can get better and more animations into the characters than he could with the Wii."Luxury" is clearly hyperbole, but Brawl's budget and team size most likely dwarfed that of Melee.
I love patterns, but you have to also look at context. Also, with looking at new series being added ... that's not yet really a pattern seeing as you can only go by melee and brawl as games that "added" characters to the games. It's no wonder why Melee had so few, it was rushed and clones were used to beef up the roster. Brawl, on the other hand, has 5 new series (Pikmin/ KI/ Wario/ MGS/ Sonic).I realize I've sort of dug myself into a hole regarding "relevance," but it really isn't something I feel strongly about. I'm just trying to look at things from a Melee and Brawl perspective when it comes to assessing a potential roster; obviously, it's not something any of us are going to get right, but I feel more confident looking for patterns in Sakurai's past decision-making. For instance, it sounds crazy to me that Sakurai would add Isaac, Starfy, Saki, Shulk, and a bunch of other new franchise representatives when historically he has only added 1-2 new worlds per game.
Every mainline Pokemon game is a "big release" that sells "exceptionally well". And on top of that there were 3 more Pokemon games released between it and Brawl's release.I also disagree on the Pokémon Trainer thing. FireRed and LeafGreen were pretty big releases that sold exceptionally well. They reintroduced the first generation of Pokémon to a lot of people.
3 v 3 matches would make comically large stages like New Pork City playable.
I lost at that prerelease Gamestop tournament in one of the qualifiers because we had to choose random stages, and New Pork City was the stage I lost in. That experience alone nearly made me forget that I actually like Earthbound.
It's great when somebody is both relevant and a good, popular character, but there aren't many of those left. Between characters like Wario and Diddy Kong, Brawl seems to have exhausted all of the big names. This is the first Smash Bros. without a true shoo-in, and it's a bit odd that Samus' archenemy is the closest thing we have to a missing "big name"; the number two character from Nintendo's number ten(?) franchise.
After Kid Icarus Uprising, I'd say Palutena probably counts as a big name too. But what I'm wondering is why big names matter at this point. I think people will buy Smash even if new characters are obscure.
Big news, everyone! Meta Knight has been unbanned!
Looks like they're giving up on a unified rule set for Brawl altogether.
Project M yo.I'm not big into competitive Smash, just a spectator, but I almost feel like it was more interesting without Meta Knight. It was cool to see characters that don't get played as very often.
Project M yo.
COuld you PM me the rumor as well? I'm interested.Done. There seems to be no validity to it at all, though.
COuld you PM me the rumor as well? I'm interested.
Can somebody pm the recent rumor that has been circulating about from whatever sketchy source that it is. I'm curious.
All right. I'd like to know what this is, too.