let's talk coffee
Troll us by finishing in last place then rage quitting?
let's talk coffee
What do you think is the ratio between normal people and weirdos on GAF?
I shudder to think about this question at times.
We need to use this as a lesson to all of our juniors that pass through:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=119161079&postcount=870
Don't post on gaming side, you aren't wise enough yet!
We need to use this as a lesson to all of our juniors that pass through:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=119161079&postcount=870
Don't post on gaming side, you aren't wise enough yet!
This is their field, we just play on it (for better or worse).That's the kind of ban that is fucking absurd. Besada taking it upon himself to not only judge offensiveness but also whether or not a remark is of sufficiently substantive value to allow the user to continue their existence is idiotic and a ridiculous over-reach. I get trying to moderate out offensive behavior but trying to moderate tone and depth is pathetic.
Sorry, you're too shallow to participate in this video game forum!
I always thought better of besada.
This is their field, we just play on it.
are video games serious business again?
guess I have to take my monthly trip to gaming side to read that topic
let's talk coffee
are video games serious business again?
guess I have to take my monthly trip to gaming side to read that topic
Giant Bomb E3 podcasts/shows were hardly diverse (I think 2 non-white men in total over the course of four shows with a total of about 30-35 people coming in and out?).are video games serious business again?
guess I have to take my monthly trip to gaming side to read that topic
But seriously though, Giant Bomb's treasure trove of white dudes is impressive. When you think you've seen them all, here comes E3 and 15-20 new ones show up.
White Dudes Emporium up there.
I asked 26 league insiders to grade every projected starting quarterback on a 1-5 scale, with "one" reserved for the best and "five" for the worst. Eight general managers, two former GMs, four pro personnel evaluators, seven coordinators, two head coaches, two position coaches and a top executive participated, attacking the project with gusto almost across the board.
http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/stor...cks-tiers?ex_cid=InsiderTwitter_Sando_QBTiers
Explaining the tiers
Once we had averaged the results for each QB, we rounded the numbers to the nearest tiers -- so that a 2.49 would round to Tier 2 and a 2.50 would round to Tier 3, and so on.
Alok Pattani of ESPN Stats & Information added one point for every one-tier gap between a QB's average tier level and a voter's ballot. For example: placing Luck in Tier 1 created a 13-point penalty, counting one point for the 11 voters placing him in Tier 2 (one tier removed from his average) and two points for the one person who placed him in the Tier 3 (two tiers removed). Moving Luck into the second tier created a 15-point penalty (14 points for the 14 first-tier votes and one point for the single third-tier vote). This linear penalty system bumped Luck into Tier 1.
Luck doesn't have the track record of the other Tier 1 QBs, and there was a clear gap in the voting between him and the top four. But people in the league love him almost unconditionally, and 14 of the 26 voters insisted upon putting him in the top tier (each of the top four received 25 of 26 Tier 1 votes).
The evaluators think Luck has carried a subpar roster to a 22-10 record without much help. They see no limitations. They have zero doubt about his long-term stardom and felt strongly enough to give him 14 first-tier votes even while acknowledging he's below the Big Four at this early stage. Every other QB fell into the tier in which he received the most votes, and So shall Luck, even if his Tier 1 designation feels a bit premature.
"I'm not going to downgrade him because it's only his second year," a defensive coordinator said after placing Luck in the first tier. "He can put it on his back as a younger player, where some of these other guys had good help running the ball like Ben (Roethlisberger) or Matt (Ryan) or Russell (Wilson) or Joe (Flacco). They have had people you could hand it to. They say you can win with a young QB when you have a top-10 defense and a top-10 running game. Luck hasn't had either."
The Colts have gone 22-10 with Luck, while ranking 28th in defensive EPA and 24th in both rushing yards and rushing attempts by running backs. Luck ranks fourth in drop-backs over that span, trailing only Matthew Stafford, Brees and Ryan.
Still, there isn't much of an individual statistical argument for Luck's inclusion in Tier 1. His completion percentage (57.0) and passer rating (81.5) lag. His QBR score (63.8) ranks eighth and reflects significant value added through rushing. "Luck turns the ball over too much," one GM said in explaining why he left Luck in the second tier for now. A head coach called Luck "a two becoming a one" -- a comment consistent with the thinking of everyone who placed Luck in the second tier.
We need to use this as a lesson to all of our juniors that pass through:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=119161079&postcount=870
Don't post on gaming side, you aren't wise enough yet!
I'd agree with this as well. Do you have insider? Curious as to how they have Tier 2 and 3.Insider piece, but Sando talked to a bunch of head coaches and front office people, and they ranked all the starting QBs by placing them in 4 tiers.
Tier 1
Top 4 guys all tied for 1st
1. Brady, Brees, Rodgers, Peyton
5. Luck
I agree that Luck belongs with those guys. Writeup on him
Insider piece, but Sando talked to a bunch of head coaches and front office people, and they ranked all the starting QBs by placing them in 4 tiers.
Tier 1
Top 4 guys all tied for 1st
1. Brady, Brees, Rodgers, Peyton
5. Luck
I agree that Luck belongs with those guys. Writeup on him
I'm sure $30,000 out of college reviewing Skylanders 45 sounds great to some...of these GAF neckbeards?Game journalists are pretty much 90% white males. Its a GOB club. I really don't see what the solution will be for it, as game journalism itself is not an industry most people should want to enter in the first place.
Giant Bomb E3 podcasts/shows were hardly diverse (I think 2 non-white men in total over the course of four shows with a total of about 30-35 people coming in and out?).
Some people wrote some things.
Patrick Klepek says, "We need to do a better job on that."
Giant Bomb hired two more white dudes (that like wrestling).
Different people wrote things - some were valid observations on the lack of diversity in games media, others were along the lines of "lol fuck Giant Bomb those pigs." One woman writes a few tweets that could be read as personal attacks on the GB staff's integrity (srs bzness).
Giant Bomb community...and then 4Chan gets involved personally attacking people. So you know what that means - what I hope is a minority start sending death threats, "feminazi shit," etc.
Some people try to have a conversation about it, but, per usual, considering most of the dialogue is happening 140 words at a time, it devolves into ad hominem city.
Jeff tweets "yo, stop defending us."
Electric Bugaloo
I'd agree with this as well. Do you have insider? Curious as to how they have Tier 2 and 3.
I enjoy content derived from actual reporting, not bullshit spewed by failed FO executives.
Hey, look. A reasonable list! Guess these actual FO guys know what they're doing...in aggregate.I assume it's ok to share the rankings without all the content:
Tier 2
6. Phil Rivers
7. Big Ben
T-8. Matt Ryan
T-8. Tony Romo
T-8. Russell Wilson
T-8. Eli Manning
12. Joe Flacco
13. Matt Stafford
14. Colin Kaepernick
15. Nick Foles
Tier 3
16. Cam Newton
17. Jay Cutler
18. Alex Smith
T-19. Andy Dalton
T-19. RG3
T-21. Carson Palmer
T-21. Sam Bradford
23. Ryan Tannehill
24. Josh McCown
Tier 4
25. Matt Schaub
26. Chad Henne
27. EJ Manuel
28. Matt Cassel
29. Brian Hoyer
30. Ryan Fitzpatrick
31. Jake Locker
32. Geno Smith
Tier 4
25. Matt Schaub
26. Chad Henne
27. EJ Manuel
28. Matt Cassel
29. Brian Hoyer
30. Ryan Fitzpatrick
31. Jake Locker
32. Geno Smith
Henne is Tier 4 I assume? Or possibly Tier 3!
T-8. Matt Ryan, Atlanta Falcons (2.23 average rating)
I was surprised to see Ryan command zero Tier 1 votes and six Tier 3 votes. Nearly everyone said Ryan needed to prove himself in the playoffs. There was a feeling Ryan would never be able to carry his team the way the very best QBs have.
That's not a knock, either. "If you told me I'm getting a guy who can win 10 games and get you to the championship game and lose, I'd take it in a heartbeat," one former GM said.
The other former GM said it's become clear to him Ryan cannot carry a team. "I think he has potential, but I see a guy that is a little bit hesitant and cannot pull the trigger," this former GM said. "From afar, it looks like the more Matt Ryan has on his plate, the less productive he becomes."
One evaluator noted that Ryan has benefited from outstanding receiving weapons: Julio Jones can win jump balls; Roddy White, a former wrestler, knows how to fight for position; and the recently retired Tony Gonzalez was a master at using leverage to make life easier for quarterbacks.
One of the pro personnel evaluators called Ryan a "solid starter who will never be a top-five player" at the position. Another put it this way: "He's the most disappointing guy to me. He does not have a great line or run game, but other guys overcome that and are better than Ryan has been. You can throw stats away at some point and it's just a feel for the player."
23. Ryan Tannehill, Miami Dolphins (3.32 average rating)
A pro personnel director put Tannehill in the second tier, but a defensive coordinator whose team faced the Dolphins was not convinced.
Either way, Tannehill needs better blocking. "To me, he is a manager of the game, a guy where if everything is right, he is OK," the defensive coordinator said. "We didn't fear him. I don't think he has the strongest arm, the best release. When you ask me about guys, I think about how I have to game plan against them. Am I afraid of them?"
One pro personnel evaluator placed Tannehill in the second tier, predicting good things for the third-year pro behind an upgraded line and within an uptempo offense.
Eleven of 15 personnel evaluators placed Newton in Tier 2, while nine of the 11 coaches gave Newton a Tier 3 grade. A quarterbacks coach even placed him down in the Tier 4, noting that the Panthers have been relying on their ground game and defense to win games.
"He has all the tools and he is a big dude, too, one defensive coordinator remarked. Can you give him a 2½? I think if he has the same year he had last year, he elevates to a [Tier] 2. I give him a 3 right now."
Luck, like Newton, is an athletic marvel. Their rare physical attributes make them especially appealing to personnel types. Coaches appreciate those things as well, but are more likely to value a finished product. Luck accumulated a vast amount of experience in a pro-style offense at Stanford, while Newton was relatively raw coming out of Auburn.
Hey, look. A reasonable list! Guess these actual FO guys know what they're doing...in aggregate.
Bet Phil Rivers was around Joe Flacco-level prior to this season, though.
Fatford isn't top ten, guys....brace yourselves...I hear stats coming
"I've watched Stafford a lot and some of the decision-making is questionable," a defensive coordinator said. "[But] as a talent, I would have drafted the kid No. 1 when he was coming out of Georgia."
A head coach said it's critical for Stafford to work on his mechanics the way Brady and Peyton Manning have done over the years.
Fatford isn't top ten, guys....brace yourselves...I hear stats coming
:jncBucs have a Tier 3 QB!