Lmao. If Rodgers is healthy you guys are playing him not Wussle.
You start Russell over Rodgers. Then Flynn.
Lmao. If Rodgers is healthy you guys are playing him not Wussle.
I hate to be one of those "system quarterback" type guys but it's hard not to feel that way when Brady succeeds. No coincidence that all of his SB wins have come in years where the Pats defense was great. I will say that Brady in his 2007 form was legitimately a terrifying QB but that didn't last more than a few seasons.What's not impressive about sub 6 yards per attempt?
Gata always deflects when he knows you're right.I guess I'm not really sure what Rodgers has to do with the Super Bowl?
Why was Collinsworth constantly calling his catch a fluke play?That's great. If Tyree and Mannningham didn't make catches etc..nobody gives a fuck. GB defense carried Rodgers with 5 turnovers an he put up 22 points...
YEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAASSSSSSSS
BREAD
Edit:
Just in case you want to use it as your avatar.
That's great. If Tyree and Mannningham didn't make catches etc..nobody gives a fuck. GB defense carried Rodgers with 5 turnovers an he put up 22 points...
You start Russell over Rodgers. Then Flynn.
Brady's resume is probably the most impressive of all time but in terms of QB skill I don't think he's the GOAT.
I'm not deflecting anything, he threw for 328 yards and 4 TDs against the best defense in the league. I don't know how you can say that wasn't impressive.Gata always deflects when he knows you're right.
Those numbers don't contradict anything I said. Efficient game for the Patriots offense but Brady looked like a cog in the machine, not an all-time great.I'm not deflecting anything, he threw for 328 yards and 4 TDs against the best defense in the league. I don't know how you can say that wasn't impressive.
Those numbers don't contradict anything I said. Efficient game for the Patriots offense but Brady looked like a cog in the machine, not an all-time great.
I'm not deflecting anything, he threw for 328 yards and 4 TDs against the best defense in the league. I don't know how you can say that wasn't impressive.
I'm not deflecting anything, he threw for 328 yards and 4 TDs against the best defense in the league. I don't know how you can say that wasn't impressive.
More than that, Butler said he recognized the stacked-receiver look because he had been beaten on it in a scout-team practice. Jimmy Garoppolo had hit Josh Boyce for a touchdown, so this time Butler knew he needed to come hard on Ricardo Lockette
Hey our backup corner made a play, he could've too.Tharold Simon coverage in playoffs:
75 snaps, 205 yds, 4 TD, 0 INT
Other Seahawks CBs combined:
273 snaps, 238 yds, 0 TD, 4 INT
Tharold Simon coverage in playoffs:
75 snaps, 205 yds, 4 TD, 0 INT
Other Seahawks CBs combined:
273 snaps, 238 yds, 0 TD, 4 INT
The Bevell hate is just bandwagon Seahawks fans salty and trying desperately not to admit to themselves that Wussle made a horrible read and play, pulled a Kap and didn't check out of it and tried to steal the glory only to fall flat on his face. The Hawks O is horrible and Bevell continually made something out of nothing all year.Didn't get the meteor strike I was hoping for, but I'm glad the Pats won. Seattle's bullshit jump ball/luck passing offense was just too much. They are nuts if they let Lynch go.
Don't get the Bevell hate. He runs Carroll's offense, and does a good job of giving Wilson lots of easy throws. That slant/go to Lynch was awesome and maybe goes for 6 on a better throw.
Bevell the real MVP.
Those numbers don't contradict anything I said. Efficient game for the Patriots offense but Brady looked like a cog in the machine, not an all-time great.
Why was Collinsworth constantly calling his catch a fluke play?
Go look at the throws and tell me which ones impressed you. The accuracy was solid and the third and long bullet to Edelman (I think?) was impressive, otherwise it was dinking and dunking against mismatches created by well designed schemes.Come on man, he was what...14 for 16 for 130 yards and two TDs in the fourth quarter against the best defense in the NFL?
Wussle made a horrible read
Watching those Seahawks receivers try to get open in straight man situations when they had 8+ seconds to do so on multiple occasions was just pathetic.
Nice argument.Brady played great and deserved that mvp, and you're a fool if you don't think so. Even I would say that.
Nice argument.
I do think it was not a great or even good throw. He throws that on Lockette's left shoulder and it's probably a touchdown or an incompletion. Tried leading him and it cost them. Russell was awful on short passes all game, terrible playcall and terrible decision not to check to Marshawn]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B8z0jLiIYAMCtkV.jpg:large
Disagree there, kid just made an outstanding play. There are probably 15 receivers who are physical enough to come up with that ball.
Now, the call was bad and it shouldn't have come to it, but I don't think it was a terrible read. And portraying it as such certainly doesn't give Butler the credit he is due.
And when all the chips are on the line, let's throw to them from the 1! Cheatin Pete needs to go back to college.
Are you guys capable of doing anything but looking at raw numbers? What is the point of even discussing the game?Just telling it like it is. If Rodgers put up those numbers in the same situation people would be lining up to suck his dick as the GOAT!
Disagree there, kid just made an outstanding play. There are probably 15 receivers who are physical enough to come up with that ball.
Now, the call was bad and it shouldn't have come to it, but I don't think it was a terrible read. And portraying it as such certainly doesn't give Butler the credit he is due.
Disagree with you. Easy to read straight man, Butler is clearly in Wussle's cone of vision, knows he has to throw it a half yard inside the endzone to hit Lockette... the margin of error is astronomical.Disagree there, kid just made an outstanding play. There are probably 15 receivers who are physical enough to come up with that ball.
Now, the call was bad and it shouldn't have come to it, but I don't think it was a terrible read. And portraying it as such certainly doesn't give Butler the credit he is due.
Are you guys capable of doing anything but looking at raw numbers? What is the point of even discussing the game?
Just telling it like it is. If Rodgers put up those numbers in the same situation people would be lining up to suck his dick as the GOAT!
edit: and no friend, it was not a knock against you.
That Kearse catch almost killed my soul.
I hadn't actually realised the Pats were in Nickel. That makes the decision to throw even more mindboggling.
Come on man, he was what...14 for 16 for 130 yards and two TDs in the fourth quarter against the best defense in the NFL?
I hadn't actually realised the Pats were in Nickel. That makes the decision to throw even more mindboggling.
I hadn't actually realised the Pats were in Nickel. That makes the decision to throw even more mindboggling.