This is a bit doubtful, and I don't know if we're allowed to ask, but does anyone out of the US and Canada have a link to a stream? If it's not allowed, I'll edit my post
Nobody reads this thread. You're good
I don't understand the Kovalchuck hate. It was Lamoriello (with pressure from ownership) along with Kovalchuk's agent that structured the contract. Kovalchuk just signed it, just like Richards, Luongo, Hossa, Alfredsson, Pronger, and other guys with borderline-illegal contracts did. Do you guys hate them too?
Did Cherry just take a stealth jab at Pierre McGuire?! :lol
Pretty goddamn meta right now if so.
Whew.
How you guys are seeing a DISTINCT kicking motion there escapes me, esp. when the call on the ice was good goal.
How you guys are seeing a DISTINCT kicking motion there escapes me, esp. when the call on the ice was good goal.
From the camera angle behind the play showed a distinct kicking motion.
Explain please brah for us americans.
It wasnt a kick, he repositioned his foot in a consistent motion to direct, which is okay.
*shrugs*78.5 Disallowed Goals Apparent goals shall be disallowed by the Referee and the appropriate announcement made by the Public Address Announcer for the following reasons:
(i) When the puck has been directed, batted or thrown into the net by an attacking player other than with a stick.
News to me. Can you point to where it says this in the rules?It wasnt a kick, he repositioned his foot in a consistent motion to direct, which is okay.
News to me. Can you point to where it says this in the rules?
http://www.nhl.com/ice/page.htm?id=27011
Help me out here.
If only there were some place, a website perhaps, where the NHL clearly laid out the rules of the game.Who the fuck knows
the only kicking motion i saw was the collective leg of the NYC media market as uncle gary's pursed lips brought them closer to climax
rule 78.5 section i) -> no goal. nhl owes NJ an apology
Only if they're going to apologize to the Rangers for counting a Devils goal that came directly after and because of a high stick to the face.rule 78.5 section i) -> no goal. nhl owes NJ an apology
If only there were some place, a website perhaps, where the NHL clearly laid out the rules of the game.
Better period.
I chose not to quote it because commentators are not all-knowing arbiters. They can be wrong.Ive seen plenty of goals off a skate this playoffs that were allowed, and like i said in the part you chose not to quote, both commentators literally said its okay if its off the skate and was directed, but not kicked.
So there is something "unofficial" going on with these rules.
I chose not to quote it because commentators are not all-knowing arbiters. They can be wrong.
In this case it doesn't even matter about whether "directing" is legal or not. Callahan is obviously turning and stopping in order to avoid running headlong into the net, and that's what you have to do with your skates to make that quick turn. It doesn't even hit his skate, it hits him up high on the shin. It's an obviously good goal.