It's amusing how stupid you don't realize this sounds.While true, the last time the Habs had this bad a start was 2011-12 and they finished last in the East. I think their problems are catching up to them.
Yeah but that was worth it since they got Galche-
...oh.
Who?Sonny Milano
tfw Pikma never answered my wedding proposal
tfw Pikma never answered my wedding proposal
Thank you for posting this so I didn't have to type it up.
That is so Flyers
Pacioretty - Drouin - Lehkonen
Byron - Plekanec - Gallagher
Hudon - Danault - Shaw
Galchenyuk - Mitchell - Hemsky
De La Rose
Mete - Weber
Alzner - Petry
Benn - Davidson
Morrow - Streit
Schlemko
Price
Montoya
Galchenyuk gets demoted big time. I dont think this will light a match under him though.
JVR wants to sign an 8 year cost effective deal with the Leafs
Even at current rate, we'd need to drop Horton to make it work... I already have doubts about being able to keep Gardiner in 2 yrs
We gonna bleed players really quick like Chicago did
Godfatther is going to get it done.
You should probably trade Gardiner to Chicago then. We'll give you Seabrook. He's locked up long term so you don't have to worry about that.JVR wants to sign an 8 year cost effective deal with the Leafs
Even at current rate, we'd need to drop Horton to make it work... I already have doubts about being able to keep Gardiner in 2 yrs
We gonna bleed players really quick like Chicago did
Montreal needs centres, but the Canadiens also need scoring. Would they wade into the Andreas Athanasiou conversations?
No he wont, the lineup will look very different in 2 years time.
JVR wants to sign an 8 year cost effective deal with the Leafs
Even at current rate, we'd need to drop Horton to make it work... I already have doubts about being able to keep Gardiner in 2 yrs
We gonna bleed players really quick like Chicago did
It's really such a clusterfuck of shit.
Though Weise did set up Patrick nicely for his first NHL goal.
yeah it's the coach again
if Toe Blake somehow came back to life and put Galchenyuk on the 4th line, it would still be the coaches fault
the poor little golden baby boy never did anything wrong, oh how unfair is thy life
Gardiner better stick around. He's our best defenseman by a mile.
He's playing like shit. But so are 11 other forwards. So why is it always Galchenyuk who is punished? Why no repercussions, ever, for the real golden boy, Max, when he floats for 20 straight games? Why no repercussions when Danault went 20 something games at 1C last year between goals?
Demote Galchenyuk, and it's a day ending in "y". Demote Casperetty or a francophone? They'd scream bloody murder.
He's playing like shit. But so are 11 other forwards. So why is it always Galchenyuk who is punished? Why no repercussions, ever, for the real golden boy, Max, when he floats for 20 straight games? Why no repercussions when Danault went 20 something games at 1C last year between goals?
Demote Galchenyuk, and it's a day ending in "y". Demote Casperetty or a francophone? They'd scream bloody murder.
On Friedmans Thoughts today
YES PLEASE, we will also take Zetterburg too
because Casperetty and Danault are 100x better than Galchenyuk right now, he's the worst player on this team so far he's fucking trash it's disgusting
Are you for real? Take the blinders off man - all 3 have been absolute dogshit. To the same level. Let's see someone, anyone else see consequences for once.
Surely you're not in disagreement that if they want to trade him, playing him at 4th line LW is the absolute best way to minimize your return?
oh no that situation is fucked, we're getting jackshit for him
but I don't think he's gonna turn into Conor McDavid on another team. He's gonna look great for 3 games and end up on the 3rd or 4th line 2 months later, because that's where he belongs
or on a 1st line in the KHL with Sherbust
I'm not saying he's going to morph into another player either. But I see no reason he can't consistently be a 60 point guy on another team. That's of course assuming he isn't so mentally fragile by this point that he can't find his game again elsewhere.
The other thing no one seems to want to talk about is that Drouin so far as just as much of a liability defensively as AGally was at centre, and just as bad at faceoffs. But, he's french so we'll never hear about that......
Don't get me wrong, he's a better player and more complete player than AGally and a much harder worker, but based on the games so far (I know it hasn't been many, but to be fair its about the same number of games AGally typically got at centre before being yanked to wing), Drouin seems like a PP specialist, and has had no effect on improving our 5v5 play.
Double standards abound.
Yes he did, and I praised him for it. Nice hustle to get back in the neutral zone and strip Saad.
Doesn't change him being lost in his own end ala Chucky though.
And like Chucky, Drouin will inevitably be moved to the wing. Because we still don't have a #1C.
All of this infighting comes back around to the same underlying point - Bergevin has failed to build this team and needs to be fired immediately.
8. Im with Ron MacLean on team Sign Turris. Top centres are hard to find, and hes made himself into one. He was outstanding in last years playoffs. I havent spoken to him one-on-one, but I know he is sensitive about the whole situation because of his bitter divorce from Arizona. He has no desire to put his family through that again in his mind, the two situations are not comparable. Turris made it very clear publicly and privately that he wants to stay in Ottawa. Its not a secret that the issue is term, word is GM Pierre Dorion and agent Kurt Overhardt agree (or pretty much agree) on salary. Turris did not dress during the first week of exhibition play. At the time, Senators coach Guy Boucher said it was because he knew what Turris could do, but I think trade talks were also a factor. Now, its time to play for keeps and Dorion is stepping back to see how things go. The Senators are not a cap team, with Erik Karlsson and Mark Stone talks looming. If a trade becomes reality, my personal opinion is to monitor Nashvilles interest.
Also from Friedge's 31 Thoughts:
I can sorta understand why Dorion is going to haggle on term (if salary is indeed a non-issue), you don't want to be hamstrung by these contracts down the road when it comes time to re-up your young players and you're stuck still playing declining older players. Still, I wonder what the asks actually are. It's easy to guess that Turris' camp want something like 7-8 years, but exactly what is Dorion trying to get? 4? 5? 6 years?
Also from Friedge's 31 Thoughts:
I can sorta understand why Dorion is going to haggle on term (if salary is indeed a non-issue), you don't want to be hamstrung by these contracts down the road when it comes time to re-up your young players and you're stuck still playing declining older players. Still, I wonder what the asks actually are. It's easy to guess that Turris' camp want something like 7-8 years, but exactly what is Dorion trying to get? 4? 5? 6 years?
I am guessing 4-5 years should be the term for him.
Wasn't there some crazy rumor about him being potentially dealt in the preseason for Fabbri before he got hurt?I need to lay off the sens blogs.
This might not be true but I heard yesterday that the Sens want 5 and Turris wants 6 or 7. If I'm the Sens Id just lock him up. He's a great player one or two extra years wont kill you.