This is an unfair comparison though.Hollywood said:Chances are, if I know a little bit about hockey and a little bit about basketball - at least I have a shot, with hardly no experience at all. If I played Michael Jordan to 100 one on one, chances are I would make at least 2, 3 baskets - even though he is the greatest basketball player who ever lived - just because of how the game is set up. Throwing up a shot out of nowhere, hey you're probably going to make at least one out of 40, 50 if your an average guy who's played basketball before. Same with hockey, if you've played hockey before and you know how to skate and shoot, chances are you can get one or two goals on a major goalie like Dominik Hasek or something.
Put that to test in baseball, where hand eye coordination is very important. Chances are out of 100 chances to hit a Randy Johnson fastball, I would be lucky to hit one. And there's no way in hell I would ever be able to strike out a MLB player.
If MLB is so easy why did MJ move to MLB and barely bat .200 for a Double A team? If it takes less athleticism, when MJ is probably the most athletic player in sports history, then he should have easily been the best player in baseball .. not a bench warmer for lower level minor league team.
I'm talking about the team game, not one on one.Hollywood said:Chances are, if I know a little bit about hockey and a little bit about basketball - at least I have a shot, with hardly no experience at all. If I played Michael Jordan to 100 one on one
Pochacco said:This is an unfair comparison though.
Your baseball scenario reflects a real game scenario: batting against a pitcher.
Your hockey and basketball scenarios are not real game scenarios - they're 1 on 1 scenarios. Unless you're talking about a shootout in hockey, that kinda of thing just isn't going to happen. Go on the ice with 4 other guys against 5 NHLers and an NHL goalie and let's see how many goals you get(same with basketball).
Hollywood said:I'm talking 1 on 1 in baseball too. Not get a hit with players out there on the field, just hitting the ball fair, PERIOD.
Reading comprehension. Learn it, live it, love it.bishoptl said:I'm talking about the team game, not one on one.
Hollywood said:Chances are, if I know a little bit about hockey and a little bit about basketball - at least I have a shot, with hardly no experience at all. If I played Michael Jordan to 100 one on one, chances are I would make at least 2, 3 baskets - even though he is the greatest basketball player who ever lived - just because of how the game is set up. Throwing up a shot out of nowhere, hey you're probably going to make at least one out of 40, 50 if your an average guy who's played basketball before. Same with hockey, if you've played hockey before and you know how to skate and shoot, chances are you can get one or two goals on a major goalie like Dominik Hasek or something.
Put that to test in baseball, where hand eye coordination is very important. Chances are out of 100 chances to hit a Randy Johnson fastball, I would be lucky to hit one. And there's no way in hell I would ever be able to strike out a MLB player.
If MLB is so easy why did MJ move to MLB and barely bat .200 for a Double A team? If it takes less athleticism, when MJ is probably the most athletic player in sports history, then he should have easily been the best player in baseball .. not a bench warmer for lower level minor league team.
Kuroyume said:How is Hockey more athletic? You SKATE around freaking ice. All you do is basically slide around. If you want an athletic sport that sort of resembles hockey then go watch lacross. Come on....
![]()
![]()
Look at the bodies lol....
In baseball you have to be ready to chase down balls traveling at high speeds and you can't depend on them to bounce of walls like in hockey. There are no second chances there.
Kuroyume said:How is Hockey more athletic? You SKATE around freaking ice.
bishoptl said:There's a reason why most shifts on the ice last 2 minutes max before you have to hit the bench - because it's physically impossible to do more.
Kuroyume said:Ever seen the mighty ducks? The movie showed that girls can play hockey and look normal.
Shinobi said:You make some good points, but I think baseball is a game more about skill and highly tuned mechanics then athleticism. In that vein, baseball could well be in a class by itself as far as team sports is concerned.
Because they do not get tired from standing around?Nerevar said:There's a reason that baseball players play a game every day of the week (with only 1 day off).
Kabuki Waq said:Accurate Booger Flicking also takes an immense amount of skill.....doesnt mean i would make a sport out of it.
Nerevar said:how come every thread about every sport always comes down to two sides bitching at eachother: "baseball's a sport!", "baseball's not a sport!", etc etc. ad nauseum. I am able to predict with 100% accuracy that any person claiming that "Baseball isn't a sport" never played it at a competitive level (and no, your little league all-star team doesn't count). That's pretty much the nature of any sport.
Haha, what? Linemen are great when it comes to brute force, but you think they can run/skate as fast as players in the other big sports? Have you SEEN those guys pick up a fumble before?Ramirez said:I thought we had already been over the fat thing not meaning that you can't be athletic.Look at any linemen in the NFL,geez.
hahaha, I forgot the topic was MLB vs people on this boardRamirez said:Yes I have,and those guys could probably outrun a good majority of the people on this board
or anywhere for that matter.
The part where you said they're not blazing fast because they're fat, but they're still fast for fat people? Yeah, that's great, that's a testiment to how they're more athletic than hockey players.Ramirez said:You forgot the other part!
Fight for Freeform said:Shinobi...the fact that you are interested in WRC while never doing it before can't be used as evidence against my theory. Let me ask you a question, did you fall in love with Rally racing while just flipping channels one day, and then seeing it, thinking it was the coolest thing you saw? There ARE a few open minded people like that, but most people aren't like that.
People who watch curling, bowling, etc. have some knowledge of the sport, and most likely have played it before. Now, I don't have any stats to back this up, it's all based on my observations.
You have no stats to back your theory up (which is based on nothing but your observations), but you're telling me what I can and can't use as evidence, based on my own observations? Heh, that works.
That doesn't neccessarily make such people the majority mind you, but to dismiss the notion out of hand is a bit silly.
Kuroyume said:Ever seen the mighty ducks?
Azih said:Edit: Note the lack of hockey in those pics. Hockey is a MANS sport
Rocket9 said:Cough cough...
![]()
Azih said:Alright fine Hockey is a PRIMATE'S sport. Keep the lousy canines out!
What are you going to do, tackle a dog :lolDMczaf said::lol :lol :lol WTF, why did they tackle their own team?!
Fight for Freeform said:Heck, Calgarians jumped on the Flames bandwagon, and they don't know much about hockey (these guys boo a hand pass made by the opposition in thier own zone)...and so I know that people can get swept up into sports without really knowing them...but my point is that Americans don't know enough about hockey to begin with. We can't expect them to be caught up in hype (it's happened when Gretz was traded to LA) because I don't see any big things for the NHL soon.
Ok, I'm just rambling now...![]()
Cyan said:soccer<baseball
Hahaha, I always knew it!
3) Which of these sports in Page 2's top 10 is least difficult?
30.4% Baseball
20.6% Tennis
15.6% Soccer
15.4% Basketball
3.9% Martial arts
3.8% Wrestling
3.6% Football
3.1% Gymnastics
2.4% Boxing
1.1% Ice hockey
2) Which of these sports in Page 2's top 10 is most difficult?
25.7% Ice hockey
22.2% Boxing
17.2% Wrestling
7.4% Football
6.9% Gymnastics
6.7% Soccer
5.5% Baseball
4.1% Martial arts
2.5% Basketball
1.9% Tennis