Kataploom
Gold Member
Had to look for it to believe... damn...An overclocked Switch can run TOTK at 60 fps 1080p.
Had to look for it to believe... damn...An overclocked Switch can run TOTK at 60 fps 1080p.
considering PS5 is struggling to even stay at 1080p, I am ok with a handheld at this resolution.All these BS rumours. You know Nintendo will have to grow a big pair to compete properly. Otherwise it will be 1080p max on handheld if it is a handheld.
Switch was never ever going to be that strong. That wasn't a leak, it was made up. At best Switch was originally targeting Xbox One-ish specs, and was further refined prior to final hardware, in order to meet battery and performance targets.Lol, remember when reliable leakers said the Switch would perform close to a PS4 Pro? Well, this is probably yet another round of delusion from that same crowd. Like, be realistic... portable devices that cost around $1k can't do it, how would Nintendo be able to when they're pretty adamant of turning a profit on hardware from day one.
I think DLSS will go a long way to mask the huge gulf in performance between Switch successor and current-gen consoles. Still though, using Switch as the comparison, we are in for a substantial increase in performance, I think. Which is exciting.People are going to be really disappointed when they find out these rumors are just rumors. Then people will get all mad and make hate videos about how the Nintendo console isn't what they dreamed in their heads. The Asus Rog Ally is $700 and I'm guessing the new Switch will be similar to that power with Nvidia tech behind it. Even then, how will they sell it for an affordable price? That goes against Nintendo's strategy. People obviously know this but are still going to clickbait and mislead people.
On average or just in a few games?considering PS5 is struggling to even stay at 1080p, I am ok with a handheld at this resolution.
what a joke of a system these 2 consoles are. as soon as they see the letters UE5 they shit bricks and go 720p.
From what Nate said, the BOTW demo did use ray tracing, but the focus of the demo was how load times had been eliminated (which Series S could also do.)yea and honestly unless BOTW add ray tracing. series S would easily run it 4k/60fps with out a upscaler.
If I remember correctly Nintendo didn't create their own tech demo for the Switch, but they did show developers the UE4 Elementals demo.A special demo that showcases best capabilities of the device I suppose. Never saw Nintendo ran out of ideas about showcasing something made in-house.
It will be 1080 max in portable mode, but more in docked mode.All these BS rumours. You know Nintendo will have to grow a big pair to compete properly. Otherwise it will be 1080p max on handheld if it is a handheld.
Well they say it's just a tech demo, and df didn't saying anything about Ray tracing I'll have to wait and see but it would be cool if someone made thread and said predict where will switch power level end up.yea and honestly unless BOTW add ray tracing. series S would easily run it 4k/60fps with out a upscaler.
Maybe you should check what these ue5 games run on even powerful nvda cards and it's not great.considering PS5 is struggling to even stay at 1080p, I am ok with a handheld at this resolution.
what a joke of a system these 2 consoles are. as soon as they see the letters UE5 they shit bricks and go 720p.
Info from Nate the Hate podcast (will update as I listen):
Breath of the Wild demo running on Switch 2 had the following features:
- DLSS
- 4K Resolution
- 60 FPS
- Minimal load times (Apparently going from the title screen to the game was instant.)
About Switch:
- DLSS 3.5 possibly used, just not full feature set yet
1080p is fine for a handheld screenAll these BS rumours. You know Nintendo will have to grow a big pair to compete properly. Otherwise it will be 1080p max on handheld if it is a handheld.
Yes. on a stationary system with a full size GPU. Not a fucking 7 inch tablet.RT on Nvidia will always be better than RT on AMD.
It equates to selling at a loss because if they go towards a $449 mark or even $499 to create a complete beast mode that's even more superior than a Series S then they'd 100% be selling at a loss at that point assuming they are as good as a PS5/Series X NOT the Series S. Also, PS5 Pro will be out by then for most likely at a $499 which will be 100% sold at a loss and will be far superior to the Switch 2. Nintendo would need to sell their machine at like $700 at that point to make profit. Nintendo will NOT be putting their price as high as that with their competition. It will always be lower.OK when you said 4 digit I thought you meant 4k, just reading quickly here. But I don't understand why having a higher price equates to selling at a loss? If anything it just means N can give us better hardware without sacrificing a margin on HW sales? I was thinking the same thing, OLED is just a potato Switch and that sells for $350. $50 more for a Switch 2 that plays Matrix 2 demo doesn't seem a stretch to me. HOWEVER I do think it would be more susceptible to price cuts and HW revisions than OG Switch. $399 would just be opening salvo then they pivot based on reaction
It equates to selling at a loss because if they go towards a $449 mark or even $499 to create a complete beast mode that's even more superior than a Series S then they'd 100% be selling at a loss at that point assuming they are as good as a PS5/Series X NOT the Series S. Also, PS5 Pro will be out by then for most likely at a $499 which will be 100% sold at a loss. Nintendo will NOT be putting their price as high as that with their competition. It will always be lower.
Again, this is based on crazy predictions if these rumors are even half true. I don't see Nintendo joining the graphics race at PS5 or Series X equalvant. Series S is possible, but not above. There are so many other factors that we have consider as well in the price including battery life, screen type, size, docked/undocked etc... it's very hard to say. $399 I can see max at a Series S equal if they want to sell at profit. $449 is wishful thinking, I'd love for that Nintendo to join the power race but I doubt it be happening at such a high level. They found what works really well for them.
For all know none of us have any clue what the hell we are talking about either. These rumors could all be false as well. And as I said before Nintendo is unpredictable. Long story short, we gonna have to wait to find out.
You have a severe selective reading problem and reading comprehension. I even agreed with you I could see $399 as max but not higher than that. But keep quoting me with your nonsense, it's amusing. I gave you a detailed answer that explains my reasoning. You come in here with a shitty paragraph that has nothing to do with what I said. You cannot read or you read too fast.Being a higher price doesn't necessarily mean it's "complete beast mode" and better than Series S. Being $399 is what would allow Nintendo to deliver a handheld that even begins to trade blows with Series S, not surpass it. That's why I want them to lift the price.
Higher price = lower margins, you heard it here first...lol.
3DS sold 80 million sales. certainly not a failure by any stretch of the imagination. Elder Legend and it certainly wasn't horrible, either. Not even the Wii U was bad when you take into account its game library, which is why like 40% of the Switch First Party is legitimately just Wii U ports.Remember what happened with 3DS and Wii U?
You have a severe selective reading problem and reading comprehension. I even agreed with you I could see $399 as max but not higher than that. But keep quoting me with your nonsense, it's amusing. I gave you a detailed answer that explains my reasoning. You come in here with a shitty paragraph that has nothing to do with what I said. You cannot read or you read too fast.
I am not sure if Nintendo will do $399. they never sell their consoles at a loss so why change that now? PS5 Pro will be out by that time (assuming rumors are true) and will most likely replace the standard PS5 and cost $499 and the PS5 will now be $399 or $349. Max I see for switch is $349 not above.
It didn't do bad, but 3DS is good example of why Nintendo fans care about price.3DS sold 80 million sales. certainly not a failure by any stretch of the imagination. Elder Legend and it certainly wasn't horrible, either. Not even the Wii U was bad when you take into account its game library, which is why like 40% of the Switch First Party is legitimately just Wii U ports.
That isn't cause for disappointment considering how fast and powerful the Ally is. If it were that good i'd be quite pleased actuallyThe Asus Rog Ally is $700 and I'm guessing the new Switch will be similar to that power with Nvidia tech behind it.
That isn't cause for disappointment considering how fast and powerful the Ally is. If it were that good i'd be quite pleased actually
No report is saying that.So the Matrix demo runs better on Switch 2 than on consoles that use 20x the volume and power consumption?
with all that considered it'd likely have better battery and perform better in RT.Nvidia tech? ARM? Nintendo programming ninjas who made TOTK on Switch? Not having to run Windows?
So the Matrix demo runs better on Switch 2 than on consoles that use 20x the volume and power consumption?
with all that considered it'd likely have better battery and perform better in RT.
I'm just hoping all these rumors are fake because I'd rather not Nintendo have an actually powerful system... that'd make Nintendo emulation hard for the first time in decades
lol whutLike, be realistic... portable devices that cost around $1k can't do it
Your maths isa year off.I think 8 years
hey i don't want Switch2 games to perform poorly. if the new hardware enables 1080p 60 on every new release and a boost to perf on older titles too thats great, i want switch 2 players to have a great experience with their new system...We wouldn't want paying customers to have good performance for once.
UE5 is unstable and shit on the strongest PCs... the engine isn't there yet but will be eventually and the consoles much like the PC (and even mobile because Epic focus on scalability) will all run (hopefully) smootherconsidering PS5 is struggling to even stay at 1080p, I am ok with a handheld at this resolution.
what a joke of a system these 2 consoles are. as soon as they see the letters UE5 they shit bricks and go 720p.
The new 3DS was more powerful than the gamecube by a large margin, though. Just didn't have the games to really show it (outside of like Minecraft)The best was the new 3ds... "insiders" claimed it was like equal to GameCube or something silly and it ended up just being a little bigger wirh a circle pad and a slightly stronger internals that slightly help performance in like 3 games
Dude go back to RedditNewer NVIDIA architecture runs RT better than old AMD tech!
RT performance is better at lower resolutions!
Stay tuned to real news at 11