TheGreatMightyPoo
Banned
Never.Wait when did we get official confirmation that GTAV was being worked on for Wii U?
Never.Wait when did we get official confirmation that GTAV was being worked on for Wii U?
Wait when did we get official confirmation that GTAV was being worked on for Wii U?
Apparently, there was a prototype of GTAV running on the Wii U. Devs always do prototypes, nothing special there.Wait when did we get official confirmation that GTAV was being worked on for Wii U?
I've got a hunch that a lot of people will be disappointed and downright aggressive towards Nintendo after the presentation. As slick and as cool as the Switch looks, it's still Nintendo. Family friendly gimmicky Nintendo. Don't forget that.
Steep?
I would almost be completely certain that $5 NES, $8 SNES, $10 N64, $20 Wii (if it happens) will be staying, which would seemingly slot in GameCube at around $15. I would like cheaper, yes, but I don't see them doing that for Virtual Console.Still shocked that Animal Crossing (Gamecube) is apparently coming to the Switch's VC with all of the NES games intact, as per the Digital Foundry scoop. Would be great value to just buy that one and skip buying the NES titles by themselves.
Speaking of which, do you guys think that VC prices will FINALLY go down after sticking to the Wii's pricepoint for longer than a decade now? The NES Mini Classic (which is $2 per game not including the added hardware) gives me hope they're open to more reasonable pricing this time around. Any insider at all commented on this?
If Nintendo are making a good chunk of profit with their current prices I don't see them dropping it anytime soon.Still shocked that Animal Crossing (Gamecube) is apparently coming to the Switch's VC with all of the NES games intact, as per the Digital Foundry scoop. Would be great value to just buy that one and skip buying the NES titles by themselves.
Speaking of which, do you guys think that VC prices will FINALLY go down after sticking to the Wii's pricepoint for longer than a decade now? The NES Mini Classic (which is $2 per game not including the added hardware) gives me hope they're open to more reasonable pricing this time around. Any insider at all commented on this?
Man I forgot all about Steep. It was even Ubisoft closing game for E3.
Speaking of which, do you guys think that VC prices will FINALLY go down after sticking to the Wii's pricepoint for longer than a decade now? The NES Mini Classic (which is $2 per game not including the added hardware) gives me hope they're open to more reasonable pricing this time around. Any insider at all commented on this?
ouch
well there goes that theory that she is his source
This reminds me that I hope Game Boy appears on Switch. I found it bizarre that they very clearly made a Game Boy emulator for the Smash Wii U masterpieces but never actually used it outside of that.I wouldn't bet on it. I do think they should use variable pricing for NES, SNES and N64 games though. Right now, all three of those systems are locked a specific pricing tier for every game save a few exceptions. GB, GBC, GBA and DS games are priced more reasonably depending on how much content a particular game has.
LKD has gotten plenty of things right and hasn't spread any high profile fake news as far as I know.
Speaking of which, do you guys think that VC prices will FINALLY go down after sticking to the Wii's pricepoint for longer than a decade now? The NES Mini Classic (which is $2 per game not including the added hardware) gives me hope they're open to more reasonable pricing this time around. Any insider at all commented on this?
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1318416
Laura vetted it and she said she heard it from her source as well, if I remember the content correctly. So we got Chloe and Nadine Story DLC instead.
Unfortunately we have only your word for that, and your word isn't looking too good right now.
Man I forgot all about Steep. It was even Ubisoft closing game for E3.
No, I'd rather not stick my head in the sand and continue to accept his rumors as fact.This is a base level trolling attempt. Try harder.
Nate, and many others, have explained in baby-proof terms that the real world of product design and engineeering is not binary in nature. Things change. Move on.
No, I'd rather not stick my head in the sand and continue to accept his rumors as fact.
Well his track record speaks for itself
No, I'd rather not stick my head in the sand and continue to accept his rumors as fact.
You cut off the last part of that line you quoted.
I've never been an Uncharted fan but I'll certainly be skeptical of anything she reports on Sony first parties.
No offense, man, but take that antagonistic crap somewhere else. If you don't want to believe the guy...fine. If you have a beef with him, then take it to Private Messages or talk to a Mod. Crapping up the thread with this stuff isn't cool at all. Anyone who follows anything related to rumors should take all of this stuff with a grain of salt...regardless of who it is.
I have a right to voice my skepticism. If a moderator comes and clarifies that we're not allowed to question the "insiders" on this board then I'll act accordingly. Until that time, no, I will not act like these people are a substitute for real news.
I have a right to voice my skepticism. If a moderator comes and clarifies that we're not allowed to question the "insiders" on this board then I'll act accordingly. Until that time, no, I will not act like these people are a substitute for real news.
You're not just voicing skepticism. Just leave the guy alone. You said what you wanted to say, so move on. All you're doing is dirtying up this thread. You don't believe the guy? That's great. We get your point.
I would almost be completely certain that $5 NES, $8 SNES, $10 N64, $20 Wii (if it happens) will be staying, which would seemingly slot in GameCube at around $15. I would like cheaper, yes, but I don't see them doing that for Virtual Console.
I don't think there's any reason to do this.
The prices we pay for those games is already generally a steal compared to their current market value.
I wouldn't bet on it. I do think they should use variable pricing for NES, SNES and N64 games though. Right now, all three of those systems are locked a specific pricing tier for every game save a few exceptions. GB, GBC, GBA and DS games are priced more reasonably depending on how much content a particular game has.
If Nintendo are making a good chunk of profit with their current prices I don't see them dropping it anytime soon.
I am responding to posts directed at me. You were the one who recommended taking any beef to private messages or to a moderator. I think that's good advice.
I have doubts on that. On the flip side, VC should be able to make smooth transitions between systems for now on.Still shocked that Animal Crossing (Gamecube) is apparently coming to the Switch's VC with all of the NES games intact, as per the Digital Foundry scoop. Would be great value to just buy that one and skip buying the NES titles by themselves.
Speaking of which, do you guys think that VC prices will FINALLY go down after sticking to the Wii's pricepoint for longer than a decade now? The NES Mini Classic (which is $2 per game not including the added hardware) gives me hope they're open to more reasonable pricing this time around. Any insider at all commented on this?
It's just standard practice to mark down prices significantly when you buy something in bulk. If Nintendo ever did that on their consoles - for instance, a 10 pack bundle of NES games - they might price it at $30 instead of $50.I guess seeing the NES Classic Mini distributing 30 games, including their absolute best in the console at 2 bucks a pop, while their actual mainline console asks you to pay more than twice as much with worse emulation and less features left an impression. Surely they saw the excitement the console build, and the pricing they went with was clearly a big contributing factor to it.
I am responding to posts directed at me. You were the one who recommended taking any beef to private messages or to a moderator. I think that's good advice.
You should try it yourself first.
Damn, Titanfall 2 would have been awesome to go.
I need to get that game
based on the last fifteen years of Nintendo third party support
I've put a ton of time into Overwatch this year and I would 200% triple-dip if it came to Switch, but... As an online-only game, it's heavily reliant on the number of people playing. It makes almost no sense for Blizzard to bring a game like that to any console at launch. If the Switch sells well enough, I have no doubt that Blizzard would consider porting it down the line.
I've got a hunch that a lot of people will be disappointed and downright aggressive towards Nintendo after the presentation. As slick and as cool as the Switch looks, it's still Nintendo. Family friendly gimmicky Nintendo. Don't forget that.
I have doubts on that. On the flip side, VC should be able to make smooth transitions between systems for now on.
It's just standard practice to mark down prices significantly when you buy something in bulk. If Nintendo ever did that on their consoles - for instance, a 10 pack bundle of NES games - they might price it at $30 instead of $50.
If Nintendo offers online without walls like Sony and MS do, there's nothing stopping Blizzard from letting Switch users play with PC users. Which would resolve the "number of players" problem.
Can you tell us which game, just out of curiosity?
You have 47 posts and half of them is you being an antagonistic smart ass about insiders. That'll just get you banned. You're not the first guy trying this.
If you have a beef with him, then take it to Private Messages or talk to a Mod. Crapping up the thread with this stuff isn't cool at all.
If Nintendo offers online without walls like Sony and MS do, there's nothing stopping Blizzard from letting Switch users play with PC users
If Nintendo offers online without walls like Sony and MS do, there's nothing stopping Blizzard from letting Switch users play with PC users. Which would resolve the "number of players" problem.
PC against console in an FPS? That's reason enough to not let that happen. Switch vs PS4/Xbox One would be possible, but Sony hasn't been too willing on that front. At best it could be Switch merged with Xbox.
So possibly Steep huh? That did look interesting at E3 although the lack of further press until the negative impressions put it off my radar. Makes sense.
On topic: So sorry if this was discussed already, but how much are you guys expecting GameCube VC games to cost? $20 USD?
So possibly Steep huh? That did look interesting at E3 although the lack of further press until the negative impressions put it off my radar. Makes sense.
On topic: So sorry if this was discussed already, but how much are you guys expecting GameCube VC games to cost? $20 USD?
If Nintendo offers online without walls like Sony and MS do, there's nothing stopping Blizzard from letting Switch users play with PC users. Which would resolve the "number of players" problem.
Wheres that from?Gamecube games on VC only rendering at their original resolution is disappointing. Not surprising, but disappointing. Wanted them to hit at least 720p.