... what exactly are you expecting to see at launch?
Give me Elite Beat Agents Switch or give me death.
... what exactly are you expecting to see at launch?
EA sabotaging Madden and FIFA is the most realistic part of my list. They have to release at least one contractually but they won't want to stick around.
EA sabotaging Madden and FIFA is the most realistic part of my list. They have to release at least one contractually but they won't want to stick around.
You're probably going to be underwhelmed then, sadly. They won't want to compete with Mario for attention.
Why does it "make sense"? Knowing Nintendo I'm sure there were tons of ideas for Splatoon 1 that had to be scrapped because of limited development time.Have you seen the Switch trailer? Makes sense. To add more percentages on that: Laura Kate Dale. I'd say there's a far greater chance it's a port with added content than a full-on sequel.
But at least March is the start of the soccer season in the US, so it would actually make sense to release FIFA at launch. Madden in March just makes no sense at all.
So basically even later ports than the Wii U launch ones that nobody bought. Fantastic.
So people genuinely expect only one new Nintendo title at launch for a console whose main selling point are supposedly Nintendo titles and whose launch was delayed for a better lineup?
Only third party support I care about is the kind that the DS and 3DS got.
Please leave the paint-by-number open-world AAA checkbox games where they belong - elsewhere.
- Some kind of Wii Sports game
- Some kind of Nintendoland game
Give me Elite Beat Agents Switch or give me death.
There'll be third party games (ports from previous PS4/Xbox One games and simultaneous releases with some PS4/Xbox One future games) at least until 2018 so I wouldn't worry about that. The First Party side is the most interesting one despite all the "leaks" that have appeared lately.
Rabbids x Mario will probably be Nintendo published even if developed by Ubisoft.
Splatoon is a port but it's still a bigger release.
One new title is not a reasonable expectation.
"Buy a Switch for new Nintendo titles. Did I say titles? I meant title. There's also a port and a Ubisoft title."
what exactly do you mean by these/envision with these? like extensions of these series? would they take particular advantage of the hardware? isnt it pretty clear that things associated directly with wii branding/motion and wii U dual screen multiplayer are being left in the rear view? they're justifiably distancing themselves from those and adapting the most successful and fresh wii U software to brand new hardware
One new title is not a reasonable expectation. Don't try to bargain.
"Buy a Switch for new Nintendo titles. Did I say titles? I meant title. There's a new Mario title. There's also a port and a Ubisoft game."
People, really, stop expecting RDR2 for switch, you are just setting yourselves up for disappointment. Did you guys see RDR2 trailer at all?
I wouldn't get your hopes up too much. Look at what they released for DS, Wii, 3DS and Wii U. It wasn't an awful lot.
This will be a RoI thing, not a tech thing.
People, really, stop expecting RDR2 for switch, you are just setting yourselves up for disappointment. Did you guys see RDR2 trailer at all?
I think it is unreasonable to expect a new launch with only one new Nintendo title, given the context (e.g. other consoles, launch delay). I get the impression some are deliberately lowballing expectations.
Mario will sell for years, regardless of other launch titles. The idea that it would need special attention seems weird. Their big concern has to be to get Switch off the ground.
A title that looks and runs much worse than the other versions is possibly a much harder sell though. Whether or not each title can run in an acceptable manner without any effort is something that remains to be seen.
But yes, it is mostly about RoI.
I think it's probably the most accurate launch game list. Maybe add South Park but that's it.
It would be a good launch line-up IMO.
A) Who here is actually expecting RDR2? I'm pretty sure literally nobody is.
B) What does the trailer have to do with anything? All insider reports have told us that ports from PS4/XB1 shouldn't be a huge issue. This will be a RoI thing, not a tech thing.
South Park game? Fractured but whole?
Please let that one be true and where was this ever hinted at?
It could be possible Nintendo has asked the players involved to hold off until the the NS event.
These two things are not mutually exclusive. There's a reason why many are not expecting high end games (Western or Japanese) to come to Switch and its the specs to put it bluntly. We'll see if it comes true or not.
Can I just say that as a Vita owner
Switch is looking like a very attractive upgrade to get all my japanese games on
On top of dedicated Nintendo software and future Monster Hunter titles? Someone pinch me!
Yes, specs do affect the cost of porting versus the RoI, but a lot of people are acting like some PS4/XB1 games are simply not doable on the Switch due to specs, no matter how much time is dedicated to porting.
Which is baloney and has been debunked by insiders several times now.
Alot of you guys and insiders having been using unreal engine 4 as some benchmark though. Not every game uses unreal engine 4.
Why does it "make sense"? Knowing Nintendo I'm sure there were tons of ideas for Splatoon 1 that had to be scrapped because of limited development time.
I'm sure Nintendo needs more time for the next Mario Kart so it makes sense to offer an enhanced port for launch. Add in all the DLC, a new battle mode, new characters and hopefully a lot of new tracks.
Believe when I see it.Which insiders have used UE4 as a benchmark? Matt and OsirisBlack pretty bluntly stated that any PS4/XB1 can be ported without too much trouble, at least from the tech side. Not necessarily from the business side.
Believe when I see it.
Playing the "guess the launch and 2017 line-up" game:
Mario Switch
Pikmin 4
Mario Kart 8 Switch
Smash Bros Switch
Project Giant Robot
Nintendo Land Switch
Watch_Dogs 2
Just Dance 2017
Fifa 17
NBA
Madden
Resident Evil 7
Marvel vs Capcom 3
World of Final Fantasy
Life is Strange
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare
The Elder Scrolls Skyrim Remastered
Lego Star Wars / Marvel Super Heroes / Dimensions
Trine 3
Monster Hunter Generation Ultimate (JP)
Musou Stars (JP)
Disgaea 5 (JP)
Dragon Quest Builders (JP)
Rocket League
Hyper Light Drifter
Niddhogg 2
Shantae Half-Genie Hero
The Banner Saga 1/2
Stardew Valley
Owlboy
Undertale
Minecraft
Virtual Console titles (all the titles released on WiiU, plus GC games like Super Mario Sunshine, Luigi's Mansion and Smash)
Then during launch window Monster Hunter Generation Ultimate (West release), Smash or Splatoon (the one that didn't release at launch), Zelda Breath of the Wild (June), and
Super Mario Maker and Monster Hunter Stories Ultimate (JP) in Summer, plus a second wave of 3rd parties (For Honor, Diablo 3, Tekken 7, Battlefield 1/Titanfall 2, Injustice, Sonic Mania).
I can see Fall picking steam up again with a new Animal Crossing (September), Pokémon Star (October), Retro's New IP (November), Monster Hunter Stories (November) and Mario&Rabbids RPG (December).
Seems like a pretty solid and realistic list for the most, scarce of 3rd party exclusives, but those (Bravely 3rd, MonHun5, Ace Attonery etc.) will start coming by japanese devs in 2018, while western studios will stick to release (or try to) their big games simultaneously with PS4/XBO.
"I don't like 'thing', so please keep it away so that other people who do enjoy it don't get to play it."
Do you see how ridiculous you sound? It's like some sort of defense mechanism against the possibility that yet another Nintendo system will be devoid of major third-party titles.
"Oh yeah? Well we didn't want them anyway!"
Christ.
There won't be a Bravely Third. ;_;
So 'tons of ideas' = full-on sequel? Got it. See you on January 12.
Makes sense because we've seen bits of footage and main takeaway was new gear on top of old character animations. No reason to believe it's anything more than what it already is plus bunch of addons. Oh and, you know, that trusty insider information.
Yeah, I've mentioned it before. Seems like Nintendo wants to push that it's a console despite not really being one. Maybe to keep 3DS sales alive or that they don't want to make a Wii U successor.First-party games and the pricing are going to have to sell the Switch. I don't think a spec article by Eurogamer before the proper unveil is going to sway many people one way or the other.
Nintendo framing this as a home console you can take on the go may foster negativity about the specs, though.
Isn't the Mario Rabbids RPG rumored to be a launch title? Also you're missing Sonic 2017 and DQX and DQXI, all games confirmed to be coming.
And I really would not expect Project Giant Robot. At this point I bet that will be absorbed into a minigame collection.
There won't be a Bravely Third. ;_;
Really? I completely missed that lol
And yeah, i forgot quite a lot of potential 3rd party games, i just stopped after a while otherwise the list would have been too long.
Anyway yeah, i listed Giant Robo but i'm expecting a small downloadable game, something easy to play in 2 or 4 players from the get go.
Sshh, let's keep on hoping!
Oh is that stuff you've heard or just personal speculation?
Both
That's good to hear, thank you for sharing.
So assuming that's true, 2017 is basically going to be the test year for third parties on the Switch. I sure hope Nintendo goes all out growing the install base as quickly as possible to get those third party sales...
Going against rumors is what gets people disappointed.You gonna trust me now that Zelda is a launch game?
The rumors are a bit weird pinning Splatoon and two Mario games at launch.I think Zelda would create the most noise but if Skyrim is there, would it be open-world overkill???
Then maybe Mario and Splatoon is a nice addition.
Keep in mind, I forget when Skyrim is expected.
Yeah. The weeks after launch are more important. Unless you have some killer app on launch, like Halo CE or SMW/64 tgat time is crucial. I'd rather have a staggered release to give games time to breathe and avvoid droughts.Does launch day itself really have to impress that much?
I'm much more keen that launch window and beyond has a steady trickle of great games without droughts. Besides, it'll be hard to want to play anything else on it with new 3D Mario and Splatoon on Day One.
It's nintendo. Anything they do will piss people off.