and this is when I feel like we here at GAF enter bizarro world.
And this is apparently where sphinx makes a lot of very weird assumptions:
.- why the hell would ANYONE (Devs, nintendo and us gamers) care for seriously donwgraded ports of anything in the first place? (not PS4->X1 but PS4->something worse)
First off,
nobody is saying or assuming games will be
seriously downgraded. Most games should be doable with minor downgrades like resolution to 720p, slightly fewer visual effects, slightly lower texture resolution, or maybe less AA. Games on the Wii were SERIOUSLY downgraded. Games on the Switch will be
maybe barely noticeably downgraded. This based on the rumored specs.
.- why the hell are Take Two and Bethesda on board (to ANY capacity) when they despise weak hardware with a passion and have always disregarded nintendo'?
Who the hell says Take Two and Bethesda "despise weak hardware"?? They are both businesses- they will put their software on a platform regardless of the specs if they believe it is worth the initial cost (i.e. the resulting sales > the cost of porting). If the Switch is much easier than the Wii/Wii U to port to (and all reports say it is) then the actual power of the machine doesn't matter quite as much.
.- why the hell would the Nvidia guy even comment on something that is pure lies? I mean yeah he wants the thing to sell but there are many strong points to comment on to try to sell the product, did he need to go there? "Hey guys, ports are easy!! (but with serious compromises trollololol)"
What pure lies are you talking about? Power =/= ease of porting. That's nonsense. And again, nothing is indicated
serious compromises. Are you aware that the XB1 frequently receives ports that have been downgraded relative to the PS4 versions? Are you aware that the PS2 was supported with an enormous amount of third party games despite the Gamecube being far superior in power?
.- Why the hell is that bullshit, baseless-speculation "leaked Switch dev kit?" thread still open?
Because for better or for worse it has turned into the de facto Switch tech speculation thread. And the specs in the OP should be at least similar to what's in the devkits, so it's a decent starting point for speculation.
.- Why would Ubisoft put BG&E 2 on Switch? if Nintendo paid for exclusivity, sorry to break it up to them, but it has less chances of success than Bayonetta for fucks sake.
Why do you think a game's graphics have any possible indication on how it will sell? That has literally never been the case for both games and hardware.
I feel like several sources are at odds and we at GAF are being misled or donwright trolled by someone.
I disagree. We've heard very little contradictory information here... the Switch can be lower in raw power than XB1 but still be very easy to port for with minor downgrades. Nothing about Nvidia's statements conflicts with anything else we've heard.