Ascend
Member
I will admit it when those cards are actually released and we see benchmarks with the performance having a clear advantage over the 1.7GHz cards, and with the boost actually reaching those clocks. Until then, I have definitely not been 'caught with my pants down'. Wouldn't be the first time that a certain boost is advertised but is not sustainable.You started out very respectable. I thought to myself, here is a guy that got caught with his pants down and will actually admit he underestimated the silicon in the 3000-series cards despite him routing for AMD. But nope, he moved the goal post...
I am not unreasonable, but I am very critical, and I maintain my right to reserve judgment until the actual numbers are available. I still believe they will not clock much higher than 1.7GHz. I'll gladly be proven wrong once the cards are released. And I should probably clarify that I mean sustained clocks, not boosting for one or two seconds.
Last edited: