• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

NYT: Legal Marijuana Sales Hit $5.4 Billion in 2015

Status
Not open for further replies.

TheFatOne

Member
Not going to pass ever in NH with Hassan in office. She's super opposed to it in all forms, even medical.

I think it's going to be harder to not legalize marijuana in new england once Massachusetts legalizes it. It's going to be on the ballot in 2016 for Mass. and it's highly likely it's going to pass. NH time will come.
 

Kas

Member
I think it's going to be harder to not legalize marijuana in new england once Massachusetts legalizes it. It's going to be on the ballot in 2016 for Mass. and it's highly likely it's going to pass. NH time will come.

If Mass does, we will the year after. We bend over for Mass and their tourists, especially in the summer and fall. Hell, school vacations are always a week late in the winter because of all tourists who come in February vacation and go to the mountains. Can't lose that revenue.
 

OSHAN

Member
It'll be on the ballot this year in Maine.

I don't think anyone is surprised by how well it is doing. I've never heard of someone having trouble selling drugs.
 

Friggz

Member
i dont smoke, nor have i ever smoked pot. (partially because its been illegal in the states ive lived in)

but if they legalized it in my state, i certainly would have no problems going to a dispensary and buying some.
 

Apt101

Member
How soon it becomes legal in each remaining state depends heavily on how much influence the alcohol lobby and the corrections lobby has over their state legislators. At the federal level it's probably not going to happen until at least half the states have legalized - Congress is simply bought and sold too much as a whole.

Interestingly, the president does have some options but it would take time (well, likely take time according to this lawyer):

By Robert Mikos of the Law Professor Blogs Network said:
The Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. section 811 delegates authority to the Attorney General, working in consultation with the DEA and the Secretary of HHS, to reschedule marijuana or (possibly) even to remove it from the list of controlled substances altogether. Moving marijuana to schedule IV or V, or removing it from the list altogether, would make the drug legal under federal law. There would be no more threat of criminal prosecution, of preemption, of tax penalties, of the loss of federal benefits, and so on.

It is important to note, however, that President Obama could not simply order the Attorney General to reschedule marijuana tomorrow. The CSA requires the Attorney General to follow certain, notoriously cumbersome procedures when rescheduling drugs (hold hearings, etc.), and it seems to require the Attorney General to adhere to any treaties governing the drug regardless of what those hearings might reveal. For these reasons, the President could probably order only limited legalization of marijuana (say, for certain medical purposes), and then, only after months if not years of formal hearings
 

BennyBlanco

aka IMurRIVAL69
No, they're all about the status quo. It's why they're typically labeled as conservatives.



That's always been the case, but the majority of the opposition has always come from republican conservatives.

Obama is against legalization for recreational use. I don't see it as "republitards" (very classy btw) holding it up, might just be a generational thing.
 
Obama is against legalization for recreational use. I don't see it as "republitards" (very classy btw) holding it up, might just be a generational thing.

I think Obama, and many other politicians, don't have a personal problem with recreational use, but I think they're afraid of losing votes if they come out in acceptance of legalizing it. Older Americans are still against it, and they are the most reliable bloc of voters in the country. Once more states legalize it, you'll see more politicians come out in favor of it.
 

BennyBlanco

aka IMurRIVAL69
They've been holding it up for decades. It's not even close to being a generational thing.

holding it up from who? you act like the democrats are out here fighting the good fight tooth and nail. hillary is basically saying the same things rand paul is saying about marijuana, decriminalization and more support for medicals users. obama is against recreational use and went as far as to suggest it wouldn't be good for the economy (in 2011).

on the state level, there are tons of states with democrat governors not touching this with a 10 ft pole. let's see some receipts. or did you really just wanna use "republitards" in a sentence?
 

pa22word

Member
Republicans aren't really ideologically against pot (well, maybe except for the freedom caucus) for the most part anyways, it's just that they have to get elected too, and recreational drug use has been a beating tool for both parties for so long that it's going to have to take a generation to die off before either party can really take an open stance too towards it.
 
Legal marijuana is a really good example of institutional racism right? Minorities have been disproportionately going to prison for years for selling weed, yet now that it's legal it's a giant multi-billion dollar industry that is lining the pockets of white people.
 

BennyBlanco

aka IMurRIVAL69
Legal marijuana is a really good example of institutional racism right? Minorities have been disproportionately going to prison for years for selling weed, yet now that it's legal it's a giant multi-billion dollar industry that is lining the pockets of white people.

what a ridiculous notion. if weed is legal, nobody is going to prison for it. and it's also not just white people making money here.
 

BennyBlanco

aka IMurRIVAL69
it's mostly white people making money here, if you're referring to people who run stores

If you're talking about Colorado, the state is 82% white. Washington State is 77% white.

I haven't been to either state and can't really comment, but anecdotally I went to a couple dispensaries in CA a few years ago and neither was run by white people. To suggest it's racist to legalize weed is completely absurd. The war on drugs was/is institutional racism.
 
meanwhile, my state (nebraska) wants to sue colorado because we have to spend more of our resources at the border combating all the pot.

would just be easier to make it legal and not have to waste the money + earn the money from the sale of it, but that would "go against what makes nebraska great"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom