MightyKAC said:That's pretty much my response to 90% of the posts on this thread.
MightyKAC said:That's pretty much my response to 90% of the posts on this thread.
"This is theft, clear and simple. It's smash and grab, no different than a guy walking down Fifth Avenue and smashing the window at Tiffany's and reaching in and grabbing what's in the window."
HiResDes said:I don't understand why people refuse to vote for Nader, fuck things would be a lot better at least in my eyes.
Or, in a 2 party system, with no preferential voting system in place, it would be a wasted vote... depending on your goals when voting, of course.Karma Kramer said:People think Nadar is crazy because the media has made him out to be such. When everything is controlled by corporations, even our elections, its almost impossible to get the more un-informed/un-educated playing for the right team
It would be easier if we'd just throw out the Electoral College... and if our supreme court didn't hand over the reigns of Democracy over to a bunch of rich thieves.Dead Man said:Or, in a 2 party system, with no preferential voting system in place, it would be a wasted vote... depending on your goals when voting, of course.
The bill would make P2P or BitTorrent client development a criminal offense if the distributed software was used for infringement.
Dead Man said:Or, in a 2 party system, with no preferential voting system in place, it would be a wasted vote... depending on your goals when voting, of course.
fortified_concept said:The only wasted vote is when you're voting every time for the same 2-party corporate dictatorship expecting different results. It's also the definition of insanity.
ElectricBlue187 said::lol your tag is still funny
Well... yeah.Thunder Monkey said:It would be easier if we'd just throw out the Electoral College... and if our supreme court didn't hand over the reigns of Democracy over to a bunch of rich thieves.
Ehhh, thinking about it. We're fucked.
Time to just back away slowly.
It's a definition of insanity. Certainly not the clinical one. And many people vote to prevent a party getting power, rather than elect one. Not saying it is right, just that a lot of people in America feel that is the only sensible way to vote. I think everyone should look at Australia and NZ's electoral systems if they want more than 2 parties to have power, but now I am starting to get off topic.fortified_concept said:The only wasted vote is when you're voting every time for the same 2-party corporate dictatorship expecting different results. It's also the definition of insanity.
MattyGrovesOrMe said:Isn't this technically already illegal in the US, has been since 1998.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act
Many GAF avatars are technically copyright infringements, so are scans of magazine articles (which GAF punishes) and the copying/pasting full text of articles other websites not licensed under CC/GNU (which GAF doesn't punish but should).
Too bad thing can't go back to the days when people had principles and you knew what you were voting for before hand... :lolfortified_concept said:The only wasted vote is when you're voting every time for the same 2-party corporate dictatorship expecting different results. It's also the definition of insanity.
Stephen Harper is in the process of making the Americans happy by pushing through a law saying that any and every entertainment purchase since VHS or even older is not actually a purchase, it's a licensing agreement that you automatically agreed to by handing over money (unless it was free, like TV, in which case you agreed to it by... I dunno... letting the Conservatives stay in power too long), and that it's legally-binding terms are whatever the copyright holder happens to think those terms should be, even if they violate your rights as a Canadian citizen, and the copyright holder has no obligation to inform you of those terms.spiderman123 said:thank god i'm Canadian
Thunder Monkey said:Too bad thing can't go back to the days when people had principles and you knew what you were voting for before hand... :lol
It's not like I don't agree with you... but America isn't a country that changes easily. For one thing, people would have to realize corporations are hurting them and these poor saps don't even realize the drinking water they're sipping is being poisoned.
But that's okay! That's where regulators are supposed to come in!
Oh... the last decade pretty much wiped out any power our regulators had, and our current government has done little to fix the problem.
...
I stand by my assessment. We're fucked.
Voting for Dems doesn't help, and voting for Republicans makes the problem much worse. We can't have a 3rd party candidate, because they won't have the backing of enough money to expect to win. Because people are swayed by flashy ads.
So we're fucked, we've done it to ourselves, and without drastic restructuring of our election systems... and government... and education system nothing can be fixed. And I never see any of those things being a high enough priority.
I'll just keep voting for Dems. At the very least I can't see some problems with deregulation getting much worse under a Democrat. But "God" help us if another Republican gets in.
We will never have that utopia you wish for... because humans aren't built that way. We are selfish, and greedy. Also shortsighted, and completely ignorant to reality. Mainly because we've become very adept at creating our own reality. And we're very easily distracted.
Ummm... it sucks, but what do you expect? Humans had a hand in it, therefore it's inherently flawed. Some can see the faults and exploit them for all it's worth.
But throughout all of these... very depressing truths, comes the happy realization that life has an ending. For everyone. No matter how hard some like to hold onto their power, they'll die just like everyone else.
Alone.
*bows*
What? They are almost the same.perfectchaos007 said:NO! thats our problem! Americans just vote along party lines which is stupid. Why do we need a party to tell us what we believe in? Why not just voting for the guy who we think will make the country better? The Republican agenda, and the democratic agenda just wont get things done. One is too far to the left and the other too far to the right. Fuck party lines. It's time we get rid of democrats and republicans and political parties in general because they just F things up!
/rant
Dead Man said:What? They are almost the same.
Because it won't change until people change.perfectchaos007 said:NO! thats our problem! Americans just vote along party lines which is stupid. Why do we need a party to tell us what we believe in? Why not just voting for the guy who we think will make the country better? The Republican agenda, and the democratic agenda just wont get things done. One is too far to the left and the other too far to the right. Fuck party lines. It's time we get rid of democrats and republicans and political parties in general because they just F things up!
/rant
Sorry that I got crazy preachy without adding in some penile massage to soften the blow.perfectchaos007 said:Agreed thunder monkey, it's Fucked with a capital F. Government has taken out the Free in freedom. It's now $$$$dom, because money is what drives politicians to vote how they vote and to lobby for what they lobby for
perfectchaos007 said:Well one party always votes the fiscal conservative route no matter what the bill is and the other always votes tax and spend. hell 90% of politicians don't even read the bills anymore! They may read the cliffnotes from the one guy who did read it and then just vote on party lines. How about we just vote for whats best for our country, instead of whats best for a political party?
Thunder Monkey said:Sorry that I got crazy preachy without adding in some penile massage to soften the blow.
ElectricBlue187 said:I'm sorry which party are we talking about being fiscal conservatives?
That's one thing our government Republican or Democrat can never fail at.Scalemail Ted said:wasted money...
Well... for the most part that is wrong.perfectchaos007 said:I assume that if I say republicans you are going to tell me I am wrong?
perfectchaos007 said:I assume that if I say republicans you are going to tell me I am wrong?
ElectricBlue187 said:It's just that I haven't heard the words fiscal and republican in awhile. Brings me backto the 90's GONNA MAKE U SWEAT TILL YOU BLEED IS THAT DOPE ENOUGH? INDEED
Thunder Monkey said:That's one thing our government Republican or Democrat can never fail at.
Well... for the most part that is wrong.
The only time anyone is a fiscal conservative in politics is when they don't have the political power to get their agenda's moving.
Borrow and Spend seems to be the dumb shit Dems were running with in 2006.perfectchaos007 said:true. I guess I should just say anti-tax and try to make money to fund things appear out of nowhere. But I don't know the political term for "hoping money appears out of nowhere to fund shit"
jorma said:Oh lord. Obama allies up with Sarkozy and Berlusconi. What a fucking disgrace. I'm in camp Obama no longer. At least with Palin you know what you get.
It's America...jorma said:Oh lord. Obama allies up with Sarkozy and Berlusconi. What a fucking disgrace. I'm in camp Obama no longer. At least with Palin you know what you get.
ElectricBlue187 said:war with russia? :lol
Elfforkusu said:So, I know ACTA is horrifically bad, and that's what most of the posts in this topic are about.
But what about the actual thing that the administration announced.
According to the release:
First, we will lead by example. Specifically, we will work to ensure that we do not mistakenly purchase or use illegal products.
Boring. Not about "my torrents".
Second, the strategy underscores that this Administration supports transparency. That includes transparency in our development of enforcement policy, information sharing, and reporting of law enforcement activities at home and abroad.
Still not about "my torrents".
Third, we will improve coordination and thereby increase efficiency and effectiveness of law enforcement efforts at the Federal, state and local level, of personnel stationed overseas and of our international training efforts.
Also not about "my torrents".
Fourth, we will work with our trading partners and within international organizations to better enforce American intellectual property rights in the global economy. In that regard, we will initiate a comprehensive review of current efforts in support of U.S. businesses that have difficulty enforcing their intellectual property rights in overseas markets, with a particular focus on China.
Once again...
Fifth, we must secure our supply chain. To achieve this most important goal, we will take a close look at the unique problems posed by foreign-based websites and other entities that provide access to counterfeit or pirated products, and develop a coordinated and comprehensive plan to address them. We will make sure our law enforcement has the authority it needs to secure the supply chain and also encourage industry to work collaboratively to address unlawful activity on the internet, such as illegal downloading and illegal internet pharmacies.
Finally something about "my torrents"! But this kinda sounds hand wavy, like "sure we'll encourage something about torrents blah blah give us campaign money RIAA!"
Sixth, and finally, we will make sure we spend your money wisely, a process we have already begun. To do that, we have, and will continue to collect and track the amount of money we spend on intellectual property enforcement per year. We will use this information to map out the most effective way to fight this theft.
Case in point, the next thing is about money.
So yeah, what's actually written here doesn't look like anything bad... yet. The real problem is still ACTA, which deserves all the contempt it can get. Anyone who votes yea on that sham should be immediately evicted from office. We'll see how Obama & co. play it.