Jamesfrom818
Banned
I knew Obama was a sham.
Diablos said:It's only a matter of time before ACTA (or at least part of it) becomes law. It's basically a global anti-piracy governing body. Other countries will feel the effect just as well, and it's scary. Also very sad that corporations continue to take over the world little by little.
While it appears as though Obama is making himself more unelectable by the month, it's hard to pin this on him 100%. Hillary would have done this too. That being said, I am very disappointed in him as I know Senator Obama was not caring nearly as much about this. In fact he spoke strongly of things such as net neutrality. He still does, but there's such a corporate bend to it now.
I think BitTorrent needs to go away, and fast. An alternative needs to be developed, something that will keep people anonymous. Whether you use it legally or illegally, new legislation would imply a complete invasion of privacy every time you download.
This very proposal shows the true colors of nearly all Washington politicians. They are indeed corporate pigs. Even if we had a President McCain with a split Congress right now, these kinds of things would still have been in the works. Just like the Telecommunications Act of 1996, it's something enough people in both parties will support because so many politicians are in bed with corporations that it doesn't matter. It's also very true that a great deal of these politicians don't know or care about how technology works, and thus they go along with it for the sake of bipartisanship.
Regarding "imminent infringement" -- wow, Bush must get really happy in his pants when he reads that. It's like an ode to him.
My question here is: how the fuck can you charge someone for potentially infringing? If someone goes to a BitTorrent search site, public or private tracker, and searches for a torrent of a leaked album... how is the government going to know you even attempted it, especially if you decided not to download? They'd need server logs from the site itself to be absolutely sure. Good luck with that.
The uh, thought, of thought crime legislation going mainstream in this country and the rest of the world leaves me absolutely terrified. We are losing our freedoms. And no, conservatives, you can't save the world from it either. It's a completely different animal that seems to be affecting a lot of the world.
All I can say is that the day ACTA or even its predecessor (i.e. this) passes will surely be a devastating one for the United States, the world, and a free society in general.
That and the 1st amendment.Zzoram said:The "imminent infringement" provision will immediately get struck down by the supreme court. Innocent until proven guilty. Thinking about committing a crime is not the same as having committed a crime.
SmokeMaxX said:I think the biggest issue at hand is no more free porn on the internet (except amateur). Amateur's great but...
teh_pwn said:This doesn't make the distinction. Bittorrent for pirated porn or amateur are both illegal under this thinking because the bitorrent protocol (or client) can be used to share illegal files.
Pretty fucking ridiculous of a slippery slope isn't it?
This is incredibly stupid, even by Biden's standards.He states, "This is theft, clear and simple. It's smash and grab, no different than a guy walking down Fifth Avenue and smashing the window at Tiffany's and reaching in and grabbing what's in the window."
spiderman123 said:thank god i'm Canadian
Cuu said:Hmm... sounds like they need to put some attention on the subject to get the constant nagging from the RIAA/MPAA lobbyists off their back.
How many presidents have spoken about piracy as a serious problem? Do we still have piracy? It's not something that just up and vanishes. Tell that to "terrorism" or "drugs" - people are mad and people want to get high. Can't declare war on an idea.
Does this mean https://www.google.com will be illegal?It also implements an interesting provision called "imminent infringement", which allows the government to charge people who they think might be about to infringe with a civil offense (for example if you searched "torrent daft punk").
Laughing Banana said:For a site that is so quick to put the ban hammer in terms of piracy, GAF members are surprisingly resistant to this news/announcement.except for manga scanlations and the like
Why is that?
Gaborn said:That it's ironic a dedicated Obama supporter is praying for a LACK of change less than 2 years later?
DeathNote said:I was watching Bill Cosby yesterday. Denise had a boyfriend come over. It was the kid who got accepted to Ivy League, didn't believe in grades, and dissed doctors and lawyers. Before all of that he brought a album to Heathcliff: "You can borrow it and make a tape."
Laughing Banana said:For a site that is so quick to put the ban hammer in terms of piracy, GAF members are surprisingly resistant to this news/announcement.except for manga scanlations and the like
Why is that?
That's not part of the press release, that's part of ACTA.Dax01 said:Where is the article getting "imminent infringement" from? I've looked at the press release at the white house page, the wikipedia page it links to, and the strategy .pdf link at the white house page and I don't see any mention of it.
How many of you who are freaking out over this have followed the links in the article to the White House page and have read through it? I'm not seeing how it's as bad as many of you are making it out to be.
http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2010/april/tradoc_146029.pdfDax01 said:Where is the article getting "imminent infringement" from? I've looked at the press release at the white house page, the wikipedia page it links to, and the strategy .pdf link at the white house page and I don't see any mention of it.
How many of you who are freaking out over this have followed the links in the article to the White House page and have read through it? I'm not seeing how it's as bad as many of you are making it out to be.
Laughing Banana said:For a site that is so quick to put the ban hammer in terms of piracy, GAF members are surprisingly resistant to this news/announcement.except for manga scanlations and the like
Why is that?
Zzoram said:The "imminent infringement" provision will immediately get struck down by the supreme court.
That is bullshit. I am far from some law expert, but I doubt that could stand in court.It also implements an interesting provision called "imminent infringement", which allows the government to charge people who they think might be about to infringe with a civil offense (for example if you searched "torrent daft punk").
Oh it does accomplish something.linkboy said:I'm all for stopping piracy, but actions like this really don't accomplish anything, all they do is make the problem worse.
just download hookers and cut out the middle man!Thunder Monkey said:Wait... if I could download diamonds I would!
I'd then sell them on the black market for weed and hookers.
WowJamesfrom818 said:I knew Obama was a sham.
And I spend too much time defragging my penis as it is.hateradio said:^ But those always have viruses.
entrement said:Obama has been such a disappointing President. The problem is that the clowns on the other side don't have any vision either.
I'm really sick of this two party corporate conglomerate.
nemesun said: