New qualies format blows. The aggregate sounded great when it was two 25 minute sessions. This two single-lap bullshit spread over two days does NOTHING. Why are they calling it new when it's just the same stupid system we have now, except they've moved Q2 to Sunday. It was a two-day affair last year with Q1 on Fri and Q2 on Sat. So they think putting Q1 on Sat and Q2 on Sun constitutes a new system? And why do the aggregate of single-lap qualies? The first person out in each session always gets the raw end of the stick. This doesn't show who's fastest at anything. The first two or three cars will never show their full speed since they're gonna be track sweeping. When the fuck did the attitude at the FIA turn from encouraging real competition and turning it into this Mickey Mouse bullshit? Are they so desperate to fake competition that they'll hijack qualies forever? Pole has lost all meaning. It doesn't determine who's fastest over a lap anymore. Fucking weaksauce. Someone like Michael is gonna be screwed even more now b/c he'll have to do a lot of track sweeping in Q1, and then in Q2, he could be screwed over by slim time margins. You could have someone like Kimi start last in Q1 due to an engine failure in the previous weekend, so he'll post a top time in Q1, and then eventhough Michael has outdriven him in Q2 to get a better time, Kimi will get pole b/c he'll enjoy an artificially high margin over Schuey due to Michael losing an extra tenth of two sweeping the track in Q1. FUCK YOU MAX, this is bullshit.
I'm seriously considering not watching F1 in the future. I'll watch until Michael retires, but that's it I think. I don't like where the sport is going. V8s and keeping the lame qualies session, and kicking great tracks like Silverstone off the schedule, but keeping absolute trash like Magny-Bore and Hungary and Shlockenheim...Mickey fucking Mouse. My proposal:
1) Aggregate times from two 25-minutes free-for-alls. 6 laps per session, give the fucking fans what they're paying for, car lapping the track. I don't know if Max or Bernie watch the snoozefest they're putting on each week, but single-lap qualies blow. We used to get 4 runs at full-tilt for our tv time, now we get one half-assed lap and one fast, but conservative one. Next year, we'll get two fast, but conservative ones. This is not entertainment.
2) V8s to V12s again. Let the teams choose the engine layout. Maybe Ferrari will go back to the ballsy V12s again with that beautiful engine note.
Some will choose the lightweight V8s, especially for tight tracks like Monaco. Give us some variety, that will produce better competition than these lame-ass rules. How about a turbo option again? Are turbos gonna be removed from all forms of racing? Why? Turbo tech is still a huge part of the street. F1 has so much to offer on the R&D side for turbos, and who doesn't love the sound of the blowoff valve whistling away on the downshifts? I love the sound of a turbo engine more than anything else. It's like a jet fighter. Max and Bernie are trying to force spec engines. The teams don't seem to mind, but it's reducing a lot of interest for gearheads like me. We have V8s in street cars and in like every North American series. Why does the FIA want to homogenize F1? I want to see the pinnacle of motorsport, not cars with street engines in them.
The other rules I'm fine with. I'm over the lame single-tyre ruling. I thought it was against the drive for safety, honestly. With all the delams the past two years, and with the regularity of punctures, I think it's pointless to limit the teams to a single tire. Max is forcing these knee-jerk rule changes in there with little thought behind it IMO. So tires are the big performance area now, but it's b/c of the previous rules changes to reduce aero grip. They raised the front wing and did other body changes back in like 01/02 and suprise, suprise, I've said it before and I'll say it again, these cars have mechanical grip in spades. So now they want to fuck with the tires? So that means it'll lead to new improvements in other areas. Are we gonna ban engine mapping b/c it can be used for traction control? What about banning carbon brakes, which are a MASSIVE problem for overtaking? Why hasn't that changed? So the cars will corner slower, big fucking deal. No one can setup a pass when they're all scrubbing hundreds of mph in a few seconds. These rules are window dressing to cover up a glaring problem with F1. The tracks are becoming more sterile, the race weekend has become less interesting with practice and qualies being almost a non-event now, and the races blow b/c overtaking is still far too difficult. At least we had some tracks like Silverstone that overcame the deficiencies in the formula through good old-fashioned track design. Ooops, not enough luxury boxes to help line Bernie's coffers. Roll on GPWC. I hope Bernie and F1 eat shit in 06 when Honda, BMW and Mercedes pullout. Then in 07 when the Concorde Agreement ends and the other manufacturers leave and start up the GPWC. They should take note, b/c I think this is how CART died. Ill-conceived engine changes are a sure way of shitcanning a series. PEACE.
EDIT: Congrats Rubens on a great pole. I hope he wins. Sorry about my bitterness, but I've had major problems with the FIA and their stupid rules changes since 2003. The rules book stayed so consistent from 97-02, then Ferrari dominates one fucking season and it's knee-jerk time. The last time before that they knee-jerked, we got grooved tires, and that created a huge uproar. :? I wish they'd stop fucking with a formula that wasn't really broken. Oh yeah, and hopefully Michael can put in an entertaining drive this weekend. Actually, hopefully it rains. That will ensure Rubens a great win, and it should help Michael move through the field and hopefully challenge and race Rubens at the front. Otherwise, I don't care if Michael even gets a podium, this weekend belongs to Rubhino.