Lince said:whoever said www.planet-f1.com was a good place to read on....
oh yes of course, look this competitor had a failure on his bike and Contador just kept going and that was all, it's the same as asking Vettel to wait for Hamilton because the latter just had a puncture, what a pile of shit from the British tabloids, Spain can't even win the Tour de France without calling it "unfair". These journos are like mad kids playing around in school, not a hint of professionalism or respect. At least they didn't try to make a comment on another Spaniard, Jorge Lorenzo, winning MotoGP yesterday.
Parece que a algunos ingleses no les ha gustado mi victoria
Cuando hacemos octavos caemos mucho más simpáticos.
NHale said:And to McLaren fans, do you remember Monaco 2007? It seems you are having a problem remember that race. It was the race Fernando Alonso in a McLaren was leading and Hamilton was right behind and after the last pit stop, Ron Dennis said in the radio to Lewis "Hold station". After the race Lewis was fuming and said something about being the #2 driver in the team, Ron Dennis was even summed to talk to the stewards. Of course, hold station was no team order, right?.
Lince said:yet Contador get not praise for letting Schleck win the Tourmalet, double standards for the win. Oh and Contador would have won anyway, he was better than Schleck on Saturday, it is silly to remember the mechanical failure now, even Contador apologized several times for that, but hey, this guy won it unfair! it's "only" his 3rd Tour de France win in a row but anyway, burn him! :lol
edit: added some drama, and bonus Alonso quotes from the latest Spanish news:
"seems like some British didn't enjoy my win"
"when we finish 8th we get all the sympathy (from the British Press)"
Lince said:yes Macca underfuel their cars and a fairy just visited my house turning my dog into a Dragon
I love that you're a real Fonso fan. You've put up a good defense, and I don't think anyone will fault you for it. Just realize, you're gonna run out of steam soon. So I would suggest finding someone else to deflect the blame to. Might I suggest Dominecali? :lolLince said:yes Macca underfuel their cars and a fairy just visited my house turning my dog into a Dragon
Lince said:edit: added some drama, and bonus Alonso quotes from the latest Spanish news:
"seems like some British didn't enjoy my win"
"when we finish 8th we get all the sympathy (from the British Press)"
Lince said:Jenson! fuel level critical, fuel level is critical!!!
:lol :lol
similar faces in the Macca 1-2 podium that day to those of yesterday, team orders are always in place, but when it's Ferrari and Alonso...
I actually prefer Ferrari do it in public because it is the most-fair to the drivers. McLaren was very clever (which made it obvious) with their team orders in the late 90's. DC would always have to pit late in the race for some gremlin, and it was a passable excuse thanks to Newey. But it doesn't give the driver credit for a good race.Ghost said:Wish people would stop moaning about 'McClaren fans', this is nothing to do with anti-ferrari sentiment, its to do with an ugly side of the sport being thrown into peoples faces again.
I'm a McClaren fan and I know this punishment is posturing from the FIA, everyone knows team orders exist up and down the grid, Ferrari are only being punished because they brought it to the worlds attention. Which is a ridiculous way to run a sport.
And how you can even have a team orders rule when the teams have legitimate excuses to do things like pit cars at different times and turn down engine revs is just totally beyond me.
Ferrari could even have ordered Massa into the pits and changed his tyres again, yet its somehow against the rules to just ask him to let his team mate through?
Yet again though, the FIA refuse to acknowledge the facts and work solely to protect the 'image' of F1, regardless of how broken it is underneath the shiny veneer.
Pimpwerx said:I like that Rubens and Felipe are allowed to still show that are the superior driver on the day. It gives them credit for their job.
What I find difficult to understand is why people are so surprised to see that team orders in F1 exists and have always existed. The only difference between this case and any other that we often see during almost every race weekend is that on this particular occasion, Ferrari did themselves no favours in the way they handled the situation. There is absolutely no difference between saying to a driver Ok, so, Alonso is faster than you, please confirm that you have understood this message than to give other commands like Hold station, Save fuel or Look after your tyres when what the team is really telling their drivers is to refrain from attacking each other in order to avoid any incident that could lead to both cars colliding with each other.
The only difference of course is that whilst Ferrari made their intentions blatant to the whole world, other instructions are usually coded and not so conspicuous, but at the end of the day, we cannot be fooled by this, as this is very much common practice in F1. Does it not constitute team orders the fact that team mates have to respect positions and are not allowed to attack each other? How do people think they reach such agreement between the two drivers if its not for the fact that its the team who give them explicit orders not to attack each other? Is this not TEAM ORDERS?
Just a few races ago we saw an incident in which two team mates that were battling it out for first place. Both drivers from the same team ended up colliding and loosing what should have finished a one/two finish for them. In that same race, team orders were given to the other two drivers who eventually went on to take first and second place, to hold back from attacking each other. In principal, what is the difference between that case and this most recent one? NONE! In both cases, the drivers involved were not allowed to race to their maximum potential for the benefit of the team, as the driver who was second, which at that point had the better race pace, had to content himself with second place.
Make no mistake that I would have much preferred for Alonso to have overtaken Massa under real race conditions, but this is practically impossible on most tracks, especially when we are talking about two drivers which are driving identical cars. Alonso was faster than Massa all weekend and he clearly showed this by playing cat and mouse with him during some parts of the race. On one occasion before the incident, he deliberately allowed Massa to gain a 3.5 second gap to then get up right behind him in just a matter of a few laps. I guess this was Alonsos way to say to the team that he was not prepared to sit behind a much slower team mate, especially when Vettel was closing up on both Ferrari drivers.
Yes, this is definitely not what F1 fans want to see, and I include myself in that category, but we need to get out of this hypocritical mode that we tend to get ourselves in, especially when something that our favourite drivers or teams do almost every week is then done by someone else.
AndyD said:I think part of the difference was that the drivers then did not have control of the car building, so they were just drivers, they were innocent of sorts.
Here, a driver actively did something to affect the outcome knowing what he was doing at the instruction of the team. Alonso is not as much to blame here as Massa is for following directions. Alonso is pretty much innocent, but he received the benefits of others' meddling.
Lucius86 said:I can't believe people honestly think that press are singling out Ferrari here. Hello, did you not see the incident? It was one of the biggest cock ups on TV we have seen for quite a while. It is in clear breach of the rules. Just because people do it on the sly all the time doesn't mean it's right. Rules are rules. Ferrari clearly broke them. IMO both cars should be DQ for the result - simple as.
Lince said:Vettel and Alonso were the superior drivers yesterday, if not for Vettel's dirty move off the start line Massa hadn't be gifted #1.
iapetus said:Let's be perfectly clear about a few things here:
1. The rule is ridiculous. Whether you believe that team orders are a bad thing or not, the rules as it is written is completely unenforceable, because it's too easy to circumvent.
2. The rule does, however, exist, and not to enforce it when it can be enforced is unacceptable.
3. Ferrari not only broke the rule, but broken it blatantly and openly, and have said that they will continue to break it in the future.
they better be gold stiched diamond encrusted cocaine laced caps after all the trouble we are going trough :lolGoldrusher said:
iapetus said:Some might argue that holding off a faster driver for a substantial part of the race is a sign of superior driving. If Alonso was 'superior' to that extent, I understand F1 rules still permit overtaking.
Lucius86 said:Wow the sub-league is close. Can anyone post our league table? The site is banned at my work.
But he got penalized in the race for that. It was only a happy coincidence that the penalty didn't hurt him. If Kobayashi wasn't where he was, Lewis would have lost a ton of places. Pure luck that one. PEACE.ElyrionX said:I really don't understand what the fuss is all about. It's ultimately a team sport and the fact that team orders are disallowed in the first place is just ridiculous.
Also peope didn't kick up half as much fuss when Hamilton blatantly overtook the safety car which, IMO, is an even bigger offense than this team orders crap.
Pimpwerx said:But he got penalized in the race for that. It was only a happy coincidence that the penalty didn't hurt him. If Kobayashi wasn't where he was, Lewis would have lost a ton of places. Pure luck that one. PEACE.
Lince said:same overtaking as Webber on Vettel?
Lince said:Alonso deserved the win, Massa deserved the win, but who needed it more?
Lince said:why Ferrari decided it was Alonso? why were they so naive with the radio messages? I guess we will never get the full story.
Lince said:Having said that I couldn't care less about Fernando or Felipe, bring Kimi back and we'll talk.
iapetus said:Your post history suggests otherwise, but perhaps that's just tied up with your delusional conspiracy theory about the British press trying to put down Spain.
If Kobayashi wasn't where he was, how long do you think the stewards would have waited for that gap to materialize? That's right, it wouldn't have materialized. To think the stewards orchestrated that fluke is beyond ridiculous. How were they supposed to know Kobayashi wouldn't pit in when everyone else did? That's tinfoil hat stuff. PEACE.Lince said:keep fooling yourself, the stewards took enough time so the drive through wouldn't hurt, Hamilton should have been disqualified the very moment the stewards noticed a DT wouldn't be enough, not exactly the same case and outcome with the polemic Alonso/Kubica incident right? F1 stinks.
ElyrionX said:I really don't understand what the fuss is all about. It's ultimately a team sport and the fact that team orders are disallowed in the first place is just ridiculous.
Also peope didn't kick up half as much fuss when Hamilton blatantly overtook the safety car which, IMO, is an even bigger offense than this team orders crap.
Leonsito said:So, the situation in the Spanish press this days is:
Schumacher, Hamilton overtake their teammate -> BAN THEM !! TEAM ORDER !! OMG BIGGEST CHEATERS EVAH !!!!
Alonso overtakes his teammate -> BAN MASSA !! UNBAN TEAM ORDERS THEY ARE LEGAL !! DESERVED VICTORY !! THE GREATEST ONE EVER IS BACK !!
Fucking hypocrites, this country is full of double-standard people with very short memory.
Pimpwerx said:If Kobayashi wasn't where he was, how long do you think the stewards would have waited for that gap to materialize? That's right, it wouldn't have materialized. To think the stewards orchestrated that fluke is beyond ridiculous. How were they supposed to know Kobayashi wouldn't pit in when everyone else did? That's tinfoil hat stuff. PEACE.
NHale said:The fact that you are pointing fingers at the Spanish press is also a double-standard. The German and British also does the same exact thing, so why go there unless you also have a very short memory?
Leonsito said:I'm Spanish, so I don't give a fuck about the British or German press, I'm pretty much sure they are the same shithole, but I have to criticise the arguments that I have to read and hear here, and they are fucking laughable.
As a Ferrari fan I had to suffer a lot of hate from almost everyone since 2002 (sometimes deserverd, some times not), being the worst season in 2006 with the infamous Alonso-Schumacher battle, and now suddenly Ferrari are victims of a prosecution, give me a fucking break fanboys (not calling you one, I'm just venting ).
Here is some old but good news for people like myself hoping for a track with elevation changes. I'm not sure if it has been posted.StoOgE said:USGP news:
track is going to be in Elroy, TX which is spitting distance from about 1800 acres my parents own.
Red McCombs (founder of Clear Channel Communications, a bunch of auto dealerships former owner of the San Antonio Spurs, Denver Nuggets and Minnesota Vikings) is the primary investor.
http://www.kxan.com/dpp/sports/mccombs-invests-f1-site-revealed
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/85287"There is also going to be significant elevation probably more than 100 feet of difference from top to bottom. There will be pretty views, and I think it will be a bit of a departure from the tracks that have been built recently for F1. So, in that regard, I am excited.
I hope you stick with us until the end of the season. :lolLince said:keep fooling yourself
Leunam said:Yamamoto is replacing Chandhok again for the next race.
Spitting distance? Have them build a kick ass temporary fan zone (complete with misters just in case the weather is too hot) and profit off overpriced booze and food :lolStoOgE said:USGP news:
track is going to be in Elroy, TX which is spitting distance from about 1800 acres my parents own.
Red McCombs (founder of Clear Channel Communications, a bunch of auto dealerships former owner of the San Antonio Spurs, Denver Nuggets and Minnesota Vikings) is the primary investor.
http://www.kxan.com/dpp/sports/mccombs-invests-f1-site-revealed
Pterion said:I hope you stick with us until the end of the season. :lol
Juicy Bob said:I have to say, I do feel sorry for all the genuine Tifosi after this debacle. They're the ones who should really feel the most let-down by Ferrari's actions. Sod all the Man Utd-esque casual fans.
Lince said:I don't understand what was so funny, Hamilton broke the rules and got away unscathed, look, we can always agree to disagree but my opinions aren't laughable though, you sound quite elitist with the "stick with us" as "us" meaning GAF F1 elite or something and Lince providing the entertainment since he ain't supporting the Golden Boy, you for expample have been a lot of times clueless and hopelessly wrong with your comments as anyone else, so calm down and save the ":lol " for fairweather times.
You mean his drive through that dropped him back to eighth?Igo said:So did Webber last season for his first ever win in F1. I think Kubica was another one to 'get away' with a drive through without losing a position last year too. It's nothing new and certainly not exclusive to Hamilton in some FIA conspiracy to help him win the championship. Black flag... :lol :lol :lol
I for one don't care whether you stick around. You sure do talk some nonsense but are not at all entertaining like a proper troll would be.
Lince said:yes Macca underfuel their cars and a fairy just visited my house turning my dog into a Dragon
kitch9 said:Its not about filling the things up until they spill fuel out of the nozzel........:lol
In a sport where underfilling a tire by 1PSI can cost you 2 10ths of a second per lap, and every KG of fuel can cost you a similar amount there is a lot to consider that smarter guys than us work out when it comes to fuel.
Sometimes things don't go to plan and they have to burn more fuel than anticipated if a driver is under pressure.
Its a fine balancing act, and a sum of all variables to which your average guy can only dream of being able to comprehend.