• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Paris Hilton owned

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jr.

Banned
OpinionatedCyborg said:
Yeah. The dude behind this was in T-Mobile's database for over a year. The fact that he had access to the personal information of millions means the offender shoudl be treated pretty fucking harshly. Publishing a shitload of personal information on the internet for all to see isn't an entirely scrupulous action either, and posting a bunch of personal pictures for strangers to see certainly isn't.

It comes with the territory of the limelight, especially when you are a trick like Parris. I'm sure it will come out in the end that this is another publicity stunt like her sexfest tapes, come on night vision!!! :lol
 
D

Deleted member 4784

Unconfirmed Member
I don't see why this is a joke considering it involves a breach of security to T-Mobile. Paris Hilton's address book, notes and photographs are but an afterthought to the FBI when considering the fact that this compromise threatens the personal information and identities of all of T-Mobile's customers. If a hacker could break into T-Mobile to get Paris Hilton's information, then who's to tell how much further they could go in obtaining peoples' credit card or even social security numbers. I would only be saying the FBI wasn't doing their job if they weren't investigating this.
 
They're celebrities because they have a knack for entertaining people, just like they are now with hundreds of replies to this thread (including your contributions). You obviously care about them enough to post about 10 messages bitching about them, so don't go saying you don't see how they're celebrities.

Does this freak anyone else out though, that someone can just do that on T-Mobile? Is T-Mobile a big carrier (I'm in New Zealand, it's all Vodafone over here)?

I have a shitload of 'private' pics/videos etc. on my phone, I'd be pissed if they got leaked.
 
Waychel said:
I don't see why this is a joke considering it involves a breach of security to T-Mobile. Paris Hilton's address book, notes and photographs are but an afterthought to the FBI when considering the fact that this compromise threatens the personal information and identities of all of T-Mobile's customers. If a hacker could break into T-Mobile to get Paris Hilton's information, then who's to tell how much further they could go in obtaining peoples' credit card or even social security numbers. I would only be saying the FBI wasn't doing their job if they weren't investigating this.

The news report on the hacker has actually concluded that he did obtain peoples' social security numbers. This is less about a few celebs getting embarassed, and more about a breach of security and potential identity theft. How anyone can defend the hacker with a straight face is beyond me. I'm not calling for his death at the hands of a gay man with a knife for a strap on, but to brush off his actions as juvenile simply because of the celebrities involved is retarded.
 

Jr.

Banned
Freestyler said:
They're celebrities because they have a knack for entertaining people, just like they are now with hundreds of replies to this thread (including your contributions). You obviously care about them enough to post about 10 messages bitching about them, so don't go saying you don't see how they're celebrities.

Does this freak anyone else out though, that someone can just do that on T-Mobile? Is T-Mobile a big carrier (I'm in New Zealand, it's all Vodafone over here)?

I have a shitload of 'private' pics/videos etc. on my phone, I'd be pissed if they got leaked.

First, I don't care about them, other than when they will no longer "bless" us with their bull sh!t. As for the whole "Hacking" how do we know T-Mobile was REALLY hacked for this info. The only source I saw for this news was Matt Drudge, and we all know what a Bitch he is in stirring up fake trouble (Chris Rock)... What I bet happened, (if this is not a stunt) is that trick got trashed and some guy grabbed her phone and got access to her crap, then went and threw it up for all to see.

The news report on the hacker has actually concluded that he did obtain peoples' social security numbers. This is less about a few celebs getting embarassed, and more about a breach of security and potential identity theft. How anyone can defend the hacker with a straight face is beyond me. I'm not calling for his death at the hands of a gay man with a knife for a strap on, but to brush off his actions as juvenile simply because of the celebrities involved is retarded.


Where is this info from, and if this is true then it is a serious problem, but T-Mobile is just as much to blame over this as the hacker. If you have this kind of info you better be secure.
 
Jr. said:
I guess, whatever that means. I make enough to do what I want, I don’t need to be living the life they live, which is a waste. They are mostly losers who got lucky, most don’t have any talent, and wont have a career that lasts longer than a few years so if that is what you are saying I'll never have, great!


Why some of these people are celebreties is beyond me.

Heh, whenever talentless hacks go off on how shitty celebrities are at what they do, I laugh.
:lol

I COULDA BEEN A CELEB BUT ID RATHER PUMP GAS AND EAT CAP'N CRUNCH 4 EVERY MEAL LOL!
 

Jr.

Banned
OpinionatedCyborg said:
Heh, whenever talentless hacks go off on how shitty celebrities are at what they do, I laugh.
:lol

I COULDA BEEN A CELEB BUT ID RATHER PUMP GAS AND EAT CAP'N CRUNCH 4 EVERY MEAL LOL!


Wow, guess you pinned me, how old are you and what do you do?
 
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/02/17/t-mobile_hacker_pleads_guilty/
A sophisticated computer hacker who penetrated servers at wireless giant T-Mobile pleaded guilty Tuesday to a single felony charge of intentionally accessing a protected computer and recklessly causing damage.

Nicolas Jacobsen, 22, entered the guilty plea as part of a sealed plea agreement with the government, says prosecutor Wesley Hsu, who declined to provide details. The prosecution, first reported by SecurityFocus last month, has been handled with unusual secrecy from the start, and a source close to the case said in January that the government was courting Jacobsen as a potential undercover informant.
Click Here

Before his arrest last October, Jacobsen used his access to a T-Mobile database to obtain customer passwords and Social Security numbers, and to monitor a US Secret Service cyber crime agent's email, according to government court filings in the case. Sources say the hacker was also able to download candid photos taken by Sidekick users, including Hollywood celebrities, which were shared within the hacking community.

According to a Secret Service affidavit filed in the case, Jacobsen came to the agency's attention in March of last year when he offered to provide T-Mobile customers' personal information to identity thieves through an Internet bulletin board. Jacobsen had access to some customers' Social Security numbers and dates of birth, voicemail PINs, and the passwords providing users with web access to their T-Mobile email accounts. He did not have access to credit card numbers. The company, based in Bellevue, Washington, boasts 16.3 million U.S. customers.

T-Mobile says it has notified 400 customers whose data was accessed, but the company leaves open the possibility that it may identify and warn more victims as the case progresses. "I can confirm that based on the information that we have to date, we have notified all the customers that we are aware of," said spokesman Peter Dobrow said Wednesday. "It's still under investigation."

Court records suggest the hacker was in T-Mobile's systems for at least a year, ending with his arrest in October 2004. But the company claimed Wednesday that Jacobsen's access was not continuous throughout that period: at some point they detected him and locked him out, but the hacker was apparently able to break back in. "There were two instances that we were able to identify as having Jacobson's fingerprints on them," said Dobrow. "There were two periods of time, beginning in October 2003."

Jacobsen was arrested after a Secret Service informant helped investigators link him to sensitive agency documents that were circulating in underground IRC chat rooms. The files were traced to Peter Cavicchia, a Secret Service cyber crime agent in New York who received documents and logged in to a Secret Service computer over his T-Mobile Sidekick - an all-in-one cellphone, camera, digital organizer and email terminal. The Sidekick uses T-Mobile servers for email and file storage.

A source close to the case said last month that Jacobsen also amused himself and others by obtaining the passwords of Sidekick-toting celebrities from the hacked database, then entering their accounts and downloading photos they'd taken with the wireless communicator's built-in camera.

A friend of Jacobsen's in the hacker community, William Genovese, confirmed that account, and said Jacobsen gave him copies of digital photos that celebrities had snapped with their cell phone cameras. Last month Genovese provided SecurityFocus with an address on his website featuring what appears to be grainy candid shots of Demi Moore, Ashton Kutcher, Nicole Richie, and Paris Hilton. He said Wednesday that he's since removed the photos at Jacobsen's request.

T-Mobile declined to discuss specific victims. Reached by phone, Hilton's manager said the company has not notified Hilton of a breach.

Now free on bail and living in Oregon, Jacobsen faces a maximum possible sentence of five years imprisonment. Sentencing is set for 16 May.
 
Jr. said:
So after he was convicted he put this stuff out, yeah right

Edit, so you are assuming that this IS in connection with this and there is no other way this could have happened?

It's those darn hacker kids doing this.

It's reasonable to assume that he obtained the information and his fellow greasy friends on IRC later decided to report it to the world.

Uh, it's possible this could've happened another way, but since I choose to live in reality, I'll go with the assumption that some hacker actually broke into the database rather than buying into your retarded conspiracy theory that this is a media stunt Paris is using to get more attention.
 

Jr.

Banned
OpinionatedCyborg said:
It's reasonable to assume that he obtained the information and his fellow greasy friends on IRC later decided to report it to the world.


So since you are a talent less hack in the world of computers you’re gonna label these guys as greasy

Uh, it's possible this could've happened another way, but since I choose to live in reality, I'll go with the assumption that some hacker actually broke into the database rather than buying into your retarded conspiracy theory that this is a media stunt Paris is using to get more attention.

Well, anything is possible, sorry to slam on your wanna be girlfriend but hey, she is a dumb bitch and I think its hilarious that these other fools got owned too. I think with all their millions they can live with a few annoying phone calls!
 

Jr.

Banned
Ninja Scooter said:
YEAH GUYS! LETS RAPE PARIS HILTON! THAT BITCH DESERVES IT FOR BEING A CELEBRITY! RAPE COMES WITH THE LIMELIGHT!

No, you also forgot, "Dumb Bitch Ass Whore", don't forget those parts.
 
D

Deleted member 4784

Unconfirmed Member
OpinionatedCyborg said:
The news report on the hacker has actually concluded that he did obtain peoples' social security numbers. This is less about a few celebs getting embarassed, and more about a breach of security and potential identity theft. How anyone can defend the hacker with a straight face is beyond me. I'm not calling for his death at the hands of a gay man with a knife for a strap on, but to brush off his actions as juvenile simply because of the celebrities involved is retarded.

=PpP

I totally agree with you. I just don't see how anyone can say that security issues involving big business should not be important to the FBI, since IMO, Identity Theft should be the biggest concern to the FBI right now (hell, it even related to the war on terror). Whether the victim is Paris Hilton or not is irrelevant.
 
EDIT: This space was formerly used to exhibit Jr.'s dumbassery, but since he's made it clear that he's a total tard in his posts, there's no reason for me to point that out by replying and saying, "wow u r stupid lolz!". In the future, I'll let Jr.'s words speak for themselves instead of adding in my own commentary.
 

Jr.

Banned
Waychel said:
=PpP

I totally agree with you. I just don't see how anyone can say that security issues involving big business should not be important to the FBI, since IMO, Identity Theft should be the biggest concern to the FBI right now (hell, it even related to the war on terror). Whether the victim is Paris Hilton or not is irrelevant.


I have no problem with them lookig to a security issue in regards to any person, but the way drudge reports it, it is because of the fact that it was her, or at least that is how I read it. Thats where my stance against the FBI was from...
 
Jeez, some of you are really disgruntled. Get a grip. How many are posting from someplace similar to this?
richards_shack.jpg
 
Jr. said:
So since you are a talent less hack in the world of computers you’re gonna label these guys as greasy



Well, anything is possible, sorry to slam on your wanna be girlfriend but hey, she is a dumb bitch and I think its hilarious that these other fools got owned too. I think with all their millions they can live with a few annoying phone calls!

at this point, you're BEYOND dumbass. Thats the same kind of thinking the crackhead down the street has when he steals your car cause "Oh its just an inconvienence for you and you can get another one"
 

Jr.

Banned
OpinionatedCyborg said:
EDIT: This space was formerly used to exhibit Jr.'s dumbassery, but since he's made it clear that he's a total tard in his posts, there's no reason for me to point that out by replying and saying, "wow u r stupid lolz!". In the future, I'll let Jr.'s words speak for themselves instead of adding in my own commentary.


Sorry dude, Im not a looser who doesnt have to go to work in the morning, Im tired and it is difficult to say waht I mean, but my point is this: She got owned, and that is ok, the security issue is bad, but most, not all, most celebrities are bitches, and stuff liek this is fine by me! :D
 

Jr.

Banned
Ninja Scooter said:
at this point, you're BEYOND dumbass. Thats the same kind of thinking the crackhead down the street has when he steals your car cause "Oh its just an inconvienence for you and you can get another one"


Damn dude, sorry you live with a bunch of crack-heads!
 
Jr. said:
Sorry dude, Im not a looser who doesnt have to go to work in the morning, Im tired and it is difficult to say waht I mean, but my point is this: She got owned, and that is ok, the security issue is bad, but most, not all, most celebrities are bitches, and stuff liek this is fine by me! :D

Yeah, I'd like to see the part in this thread where I said I'm unemployed, not going to school, and have no career ambitions whatsoever. Since you're so keen to learn exactly which demographic I fulfill, I'll fill you in: I'm an 18 year old male who's currently attending University. I have two shitty jobs, which give me a lot of financial freedom outside of school. I've been investing my money earned independently from my parents since the age of 15, and so far I've managed to expand my relatively small means.

Stuff like this is fine as long as it doesn't affect you. Perhaps the next time a hacker infiltrates a major phone company and happens upon your social security number, personal pictures, and phone list, you won't be so accomodating. IT'S FINE BY ME! :D
 

Jr.

Banned
Respect? Privacy? Are we talking about human beings or are we talking about celebrities, cause I thought we were talking about celebrities. If we're talking about celebrities, then the words respect and privacy shouldn't be uttered in the same sentence. Their decision to persue their dreams gives me the right to harass them at every turn they make. I have the right to know who they've fucked, when they'ved fucked, and how they've fucked. I have a right to know their phone numbers. I have a right to know that I have a right to know. They have a right to know that I own them. So before you start tossing words like 'respect' 'privacy' and 'stalking conviction' around, remember this: they exist soley for our entertainment. If I'm not being entertained, then they aren't doing their job. ENd of story.

So, OpinionatedCyborg, you dont agree???? Seems like a few pages back you were totaly, Fuck Em, too!
 

Grizzlyjin

Supersonic, idiotic, disconnecting, not respecting, who would really ever wanna go and top that
Jr, do you actually know any famous people personally? I just find it amusing how someone could rant off like that about someone you don't know. That's like me saying Paris Hilton is a saint...without actually having met her. If you don't know any of these people, you must be basing all that crap off what you see on tv.

I was going to keep my mouth shut, but damn if you aren't saying some dumb shit. Every famous person isn't the same. I'm sorry but you clearly have some grudge going on, like some rich guy pissed in your pepsi or something.

Just calm down, Charlie Brown.
 
Jr. said:
So, OpinionatedCyborg, you dont agree???? Seems like a few pages back you were totaly, Fuck Em, too!

Uh, I also said I was joking on the next page. The fact that you took what I said seriously simply proves how retarded your position is: I was trying to sound ridiculous and sarcastic when I wrote that. How you can write the bullshit you do with the straight face is beyond me. :)
 

Jr.

Banned
Stuff like this is fine as long as it doesn't affect you. Perhaps the next time a hacker infiltrates a major phone company and happens upon your social security number, personal pictures, and phone list, you won't be so accomodating. IT'S FINE BY ME!

Well, damn it, if that happens I hope you get some of that info so you can entertain yourself! You are a brit aren't you??? Damn, you guys and I dont have a very good history, thats for damn sure.
 

Jr.

Banned
OpinionatedCyborg said:
Uh, I also said I was joking on the next page. The fact that you took what I said seriously simply proves how retarded your position is: I was trying to sound ridiculous and sarcastic when I wrote that. How you can write the bullshit you do with the straight face is beyond me. :)


No, it means that I didnt read every single post! I can never tell when you "blokes" are joking and when you are serious. I gotta stop posting here, peace!
 

Jr.

Banned
Grizzlyjin said:
Jr, do you actually know any famous people personally? I just find it amusing how someone could rant off like that about someone you don't know. That's like me saying Paris Hilton is a saint...without actually having met her. If you don't know any of these people, you must be basing all that crap off what you see on tv.

I was going to keep my mouth shut, but damn if you aren't saying some dumb shit. Every famous person isn't the same. I'm sorry but you clearly have some grudge going on, like some rich guy pissed in your pepsi or something.

Just calm down, Charlie Brown.


Yeah a rich guy pissed in my pepsi once but thats why I said, most famous people. I have met some nice ones and I have been close to some bastards and then I have just seen some jerks. I don't know Paris Hilton personally, but I can make a judgment based on what I have seen on tv here and there and read in the news. The simple fact that she goes around doing some of the stuff she does, and that her only claim to fame is her heir makes her a talent less piece of trash. I guess he could prove me wrong in the "house of wax", but I am not expecting it!
 
...this just keeps getting better and better. First I'm greasy. Then I'm a vagrant. Then I was a hypocrite. Now I'm British. And I thought I sometimes jumped to conclusions. :lol
 

Jr.

Banned
OpinionatedCyborg said:
...this just keeps getting better and better. First I'm greasy. Then I'm a vagrant. Then I was a hypocrite. Now I'm British. And I thought I sometimes jumped to conclusions. :lol

I never called you Greasy, I did question whether you are a looser, and I proposed that you were a brit (use of the word University).... If you are not then, fooled me.

Anyway, its been fun, but I gott aget up in a 3 hours for work, and this is pointless, peace!
 
Jr. said:
The simple fact that she goes around doing some of the stuff she does, and that her only claim to fame is her heir makes her a talent less piece of trash. I guess he could prove me wrong in the "house of wax", but I am not expecting it!

So being a talentless piece of trash means she's no longer a citizen of the USA whose rights deserve to be protected? I guess the fact that celebrities are involved also means we should ignore the security loopholes presented to us and the millions of victims who could've potentially been exploited. Is it funny that Paris' shit is all over the internet for everyone to see? Fuck yeah--I'm mirroring that shit on my site right now. But that doesn't mean the other offenses the hacker committed shoudl be ignored.
 
D

Deleted member 4784

Unconfirmed Member
Jr., just stop -- you're digging a deeper and deeper grave for your avatar. :lol
 

Louis

Member
Gregory Redlitz
Dualstar Entertainment Group, LLC.
1801 Century Park East
Los Angeles, CA 90067

To: the Jaggle.nl Webmaster http://www.jaggle.nl

February 21, 2005-02-21


To Whom It May Concern:

With reference to your post http://www.jaggle.nl/log/item.php?id=10711, on the Jaggle.nl website, we ask you to remove all personal information from your website immediately.

Dualstar Publications/Dualstar Entertainment Group, LLC is currently considering legal steps, for your website has been responsible for a lot of inconvenience and the invading of Miss Mary-Kate Olsen and Miss Ashley Olsen’s, privacy. Since Sunday afternoon people have been stalking my clients, some even mentioning your website.

If the item isn’t removed immediately we will see ourselves forced to undertake further steps. I would like to remind youthat you are accessory to crime.

Yours faithfully

James M. Newman,
Attorney (personal assistant to mister Redlitz)

from > http://www.jaggle.nl/log/item.php?id=10715body

Dont know if that means anything for the other people who called .
 

Particle Physicist

between a quark and a baryon
OpinionatedCyborg said:
Yeah. The dude behind this was in T-Mobile's database for over a year. The fact that he had access to the personal information of millions means the offender shoudl be treated pretty fucking harshly. Publishing a shitload of personal information on the internet for all to see isn't an entirely scrupulous action either, and posting a bunch of personal pictures for strangers to see certainly isn't.


im guessing he knew he was going to get caught, so he went out with a bang..
 

Blackace

if you see me in a fight with a bear, don't help me fool, help the bear!
OpinionatedCyborg said:
Respect? Privacy? Are we talking about human beings or are we talking about celebrities, cause I thought we were talking about celebrities. If we're talking about celebrities, then the words respect and privacy shouldn't be uttered in the same sentence. Their decision to persue their dreams gives me the right to harass them at every turn they make. I have the right to know who they've fucked, when they'ved fucked, and how they've fucked. I have a right to know their phone numbers. I have a right to know that I have a right to know. They have a right to know that I own them. So before you start tossing words like 'respect' 'privacy' and 'stalking conviction' around, remember this: they exist soley for our entertainment. If I'm not being entertained, then they aren't doing their job. ENd of story.

I am friends with a few high profile people in Japan. And they are just regular people. Granted they are sports stars and not actors (well one is now, surpport Bob Sapp by seeing his 7 mins of screen time in Elktra) And what you say is just all sorts of fucked up. I am pursuing my dream? does that give you the right to harass me? Fuck no it doesn't and if you think it does than you are a twisted person. But what goes around comes around so they say.. :lol :lol :lol :lol
 

atomsk

Party Pooper
dumbass secret service agent! he should fucking know that tmobile keeps everything on thier servers and nothing is stored on the phone! if thats not a security risk, i dont know what is...

as soon as i heard this i KNEW it had to be a sidekick
 

tetsuoxb

Member
Blackace said:
I am friends with a few high profile people in Japan. And they are just regular people. Granted they are sports stars and not actors (well one is now, surpport Bob Sapp by seeing his 7 mins of screen time in Elktra) And what you say is just all sorts of fucked up. I am pursuing my dream? does that give you the right to harass me? Fuck no it doesn't and if you think it does than you are a twisted person. But what goes around comes around so they say.. :lol :lol :lol :lol

I could just imagine Bob Sapp's reaction to having random people call him....

A roar that would rival Crocop kicking a bag.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom