Kermit The Dog
Banned
Bullshit. He is dismissing the claim that the women involved was his wife, while stating that nobody knows the details of the case, certainly not to an extent that they could make a judgement on it.Like the previous poster explained, he's drawing a distinction between "which" woman he beat. It's reprehensible all the same.
This is my case in point, brilliantly but inadvertently executed by yourself and Roto. You're presuming he beat his wife, twisting quotes to suit a narrative and then labeling it reprehensible. It is Vigilante Justice 101.