Unknown Soldier
Member
in-case anyone is interested LG's 55" OLED is now $5,000
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00E5U3YEK/?tag=neogaf0e-20
But why we still got curves? /frown
in-case anyone is interested LG's 55" OLED is now $5,000
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00E5U3YEK/?tag=neogaf0e-20
A UK retailer held a TV shootout today with the Panasonic ZT plasma going up against an LG OLED set and a host of 2nd gen edge-lit 4K displays. Results pretty much echo the VE shootout from last year.
Panasonic AX802 is Best 4K TV; ZT Plasma Pips LG OLED
Beat out the OLED? Wow...that's really shocking, because that LG OLED had the best looking picture I've seen and I'm a Kuro/Panny owner.
A UK retailer held a TV shootout today with the Panasonic ZT plasma going up against an LG OLED set and a host of 2nd gen edge-lit 4K displays. Results pretty much echo the VE shootout from last year.
Panasonic AX802 is Best 4K TV; ZT Plasma Pips LG OLED
the LG 55EA980V curved OLED produced true 0 cd/m2 blacks, making even the Panasonic ZT look grey during the first Batman-Bane fight scene in The Dark Knight Rises
I'm pretty thrilled with the picture I'm getting out of my VT60, using the pro settings that had been set by the guy I bought the TV from. If I had one complaint, though, (beyond the banding on the right side of the screen grr) it'd be that I get a lot of black crush. If I throw in a Blu Ray it'll typically look fantastic, but a lot of broadcast television has pretty crushed blacks. I'm tempted to just blame shitty source material, but I watch an awful lot of TV, and I'd sure like if it looked better. If I wanted to poke around with the settings to try and alleviate this, what would be my best bet? (I've got full-range RGB set to auto, btw, so I'm guessing it's not the issue.)
Kind of a worthless comparison considering the Sony X950B was not part of it.
2 possible causes of black crush for that TV: panel brightness set to high, and/or gamma set to s-curve. Both settings will crush colors for that showroom "pop". Better settings for both would be: panel brightness set to mid, and gamma 2.2.
Will it be used for mostly gaming? If yes, then I'd go with the 5W829 personally.
I have a 50W685 which is pretty much a 50" version of the 829 but without the extra motion clarity modes (it just has Impulse) and passive 3D. The improvements of the 905 will really only manifest themselves with film/video content and native blacks on the 829 are as good as it gets with current LCD/LED's with the 905 only really looking better with zero ambient light.
Seems you value physical appearance highly too which is one of the reasons I went with a 2013 W6 over the W905 as well. Have you seen the W905 in person? I personally hated the turquoise finish on the frame and rounded stand in comparison to the minimalistic, squared W6 when viewed side by side.
And as you also already have one eye on a future upgrade, I'd most definitely put the extra cash towards other bits in your new HT set-up personally.
I'm considering returning a panasonic tc-39as530u and picking up a Sony KDL40W600B. My primary concern is how it handles motion. Do you have any thoughts?
(If you see my post from above, my issue with the panasonic is the amount of noise/distortion/artifacting/whatever due to quick movement. I see it with players in FIFA when the screen pans quickly; I also see it in Infamous around the main character's head when he moves around.)
Also, is dropping from a 120hz with the panasonic to a 60hz with w600b not a downgrade?
Oh man once those OLED sets hit under 3K I will be insanely pleased.
I just hope they stick to 1080p and just lower costs progressively, because you bet your ass 4K OLED is going to stay way too expensive for a very long time...
![]()
This is called the W805BB - it is the cheapest one and has a promotion with a free soundbar going on right now. 55 inches.
![]()
This is called the W955BB - more expensive than the previous one by about 20%. 55 inches.
![]()
This is called the W828BB - around the same price as the previous one. 55 inches.
![]()
Finally, this is called the W855 - 30% more expensive than the previous two. 60 inches.
My friend is pushing my towards the Samsung PN51F5300AFXZA ($549.99, Best Buy sale) because he thinks plasma is the way to go, which typically I would agree with, and the price is much better. My issue with it is the high input lag (I'm reading it sits between 70ms to 100ms) and apparently the glare is pretty terrible (this will be in a semi well lit room).
I am looking to buy a new 55-to-60-inch TV, but Sony's range of models is confusing to me. They use different model numbers for different markets, and so I am having a bit of trouble matching the models I see for sale here in Norway with the ones I see reviewed by different English-language websites, which makes determining the best one to buy more of a challenge.
I have added pictures and model numbers below for four possible options. I would very much appreciate any clarification and advice on the best one for me to buy! I would have gone for last year's W9, but it is not available for sale here any more, unfortunately.
First, you should check and make sure that Samsung isn't a pentile display. I know the 60" version is, but I want to say the 51" isn't, but I'm not sure on that.
Second, regarding input lag on plasmas, only compare the millisecond readings to other plasmas. Most tests done on input lag these days use the Leo Bodnar tester, and the testers acknowledge that it doesn't quite capture the responsiveness of plasmas due to how they refresh. So compare LED readings to other LEDs, and plasma readings to other plasmas, but don't compare the different types to one another. A 70ms plasma is probably closer to a 50ms LED than it is a 70ms LED.
Lastly, most plasmas have pretty reflective screens, unless you're willing to shell out big money for one with an anti-reflective coating. So yeah, if you're in a bright room, especially one with a source of lighting in front of the TV, I'd stay away from most plasmas.
I'll keep those points in mind! I appreciate the response! Having a plasma for a while now I guess I haven't too bothered by the glare (though it seems this one in particular has a major issue with it... http://www.rtings.com/reviews/tv/plasma/samsung/f5300). Do you think for the price the Samsung would be the way to go over the Sony?
Moving into a new apartment in July and I'm looking to make the leap to a 50-60 inch TV. Any suggestions? I've been living the 32 inch life for wayyyyyy to long.
Should I wait for black friday? Thanks in advance.
I'd be wary of playing video games on an OLED (or buying one in general) until they get the burn-in sorted out. Look at the burn-in issues the OLED Vita had.
It just depends what is important to you. If performance is king, no matter the cost, then go with the Sony. For me, though, I like to get the best value for my money. I just bought an LG 60PB6600 plasma for $688 from Fry's, and I love it. If you're really worried about input lag though, that model is not the way to go, as it's rated 71ms (I think it's perfectly fine for gaming, but I'm not super sensitive to such things; for example, I can see a difference between 30fps and 60fps, but it doesn't matter much to me). I had looked at the Samsung PN60F5300 as well, but the pentile display was a deal killer for me.
It just depends what is important to you. If performance is king, no matter the cost, then go with the Sony. For me, though, I like to get the best value for my money. I just bought an LG 60PB6600 plasma for $688 from Fry's, and I love it. If you're really worried about input lag though, that model is not the way to go, as it's rated 71ms (I think it's perfectly fine for gaming, but I'm not super sensitive to such things; for example, I can see a difference between 30fps and 60fps, but it doesn't matter much to me). I had looked at the Samsung PN60F5300 as well, but the pentile display was a deal killer for me.
I really like my LG as discussed above, but it has the general issues most plasmas have (re: reflectiveness) as well as having more input lag than many people like. If these things aren't a concern, however, it's got great performance and size for the price.
Thank you so much for the link! This does clarify some of the differences between these similarly named models. Also, from having read a bit more about it, it seems like the W955 is out due to the poorer picture quality from Sony's choice to use an IPS panel.This should be of help. Feel free to ask, if it doesn't clear up things for you. Basically, if the W905A isn't an option for you, the next best thing is the W828 (or W829, since it's the exact same TV), if you're going with 55".
After looking up what pentile displays were (thanks for pointing it out) I will definitely be avoiding the Samsung. I was wondering why certain 1080p TVs looked so grainy/pixelated when I was wandering around Best Buy and that apparently is the exact reason.
Is there any image retentation with your LG? I've heard that LG is fairly notorious for it and that was one of the most annoying things with the Samsung I've been using.
However, the reviews at the website you linked me to do not go into a lot of detail about each TV's performance level in terms of picture quality and such. In your opinion, is the W828 that much better than the W805B to justify the 20% price increase? While I can afford any of the models I listed, value versus money spent is not an entirely irrelevant factor.
Thanks again for your help!
This should be of help. Feel free to ask, if it doesn't clear up things for you. Basically, if the W905A isn't an option for you, the next best thing is the W828 (or W829, since it's the exact same TV), if you're going with 55".
What's the US equivalent to the 828? Is it the 800B?
That's what I've been told, yes. EU W828B = US W800B. Sony's numbering system is confusing to say the least.
I'll be using the TV for movies/shows/football (70%) and gaming (30%). You know, I've now seen both TVs in person and honestly I kinda changed my mind about the looks. W905's stand actually doesn't seem that tacky and the one on the W829 ... ehhh, I still like the design, but the metal it's made from looks cheap and uninspiring. Also, it looks like the price difference between the two is only about 50 EUR here, so, yeah. One small thing the W829 has going for itself is the fact that I might win a PS4 by buying it. Still undecided, but now leaning towards the W905.
Well, I ended up grabbing the Sony KDL50W800B after going and looking at it in person again with a friend. When I got home and set it up it turned out to be fairly disappointing. One of the main things that stood out about the show floor model was just how much the colors popped. On my TV all the colors are very muted. There's no vibrancy and the overall picture is very dull. Even with the backlight fully cranked up the image still looks rather dim compared to the Samsung plasma I had... Which makes no sense considering LEDs always look way brighter than plasmas. The black levels are fantastic but lettering that should be white looks dull and grey.
I tried a bunch of calibration settings I saw online and when I try to match what others have done my image gets super dark... One thing that really bugs me is there is absolutely no contrast setting. I tried using the Xbox One's calibration setup and that's when I noticed there is no option available to change the contrast.
Does anybody else have this TV that can comment on what I'm dealing with? I'm going to have my friend over tomorrow to take a look as he saw the display model with me. I want to be sure I'm not going crazy. I'm a little worried I may have to bring this one back to trade in for a new one.
Sony W950B has 17ms input lag on Displaylag.com.
Hows the picture quality on this one? Is the x900a picture quality much better?
Idk about 3d or 4k.
'CONTRAST' is, i believe, labeled 'PICTURE'.
It sounds like you might still have some Eco settings turned on ... there is a brightness limiter that is enabled by default you may need to turn off.
It can be a little trickier to notice because you won't find it in the Picture Settings.
Instead, on your remote press the big HOME button .. then at the top right of your screen go to :
SETTINGS>SYSTEM SETTINGS>ECO>LIGHT SENSOR: OFF
Also some of the Motionflow settings will give you a much dimmer picture, so adjust those as needed.
Please stop talking about the VT60. I've barely managed to convince myself it's not the right TV for me ... Don't tempt me.![]()
Sorry, but it's an amazing TV. I wish I could I could invite everyone over to see it for themselves, but I can't, so you just gotta trust me.
Buy one before they're gone forever.
Games and movies both look stunning.
Power consumption is not that high.Power consumpion, emitted heat, dithering, buzzing and IR, coupled with the fact that I'm not the babysitting type (one example: I often fall asleep watching TV and wake up hours later to a static image) and the substantially higher price (~500€ more compared to the LED I'm currently set on buying) are keeping me away.![]()
W950B is utter crap.
W850B is a W900A without triluminos and pseudo local dimming
W900A is the real deal.