You can't have both.
And yet all you guys talk about is the graphics meanwhile I was actually impressed with how much improvement they made to the combat, particularly the arial combat and SUPER GLAD they brought back precision block from Intermission DLC.
"you guys" yeah we're a band of outrageous rapscallions who dare to have an opinion on its visuals/technical aspects. In fairness this is a thread about the graphics though, so.... Whilst I get a little of your point around the heritage. Isnt GT7 made by Japanese devs? Resident Evil and all the Capcom stuff? It seems some are pretty damn technically focused and capable to me.
Dude you dont need to zoom to see the popin, the awful textures, or the awful illumination on the characters.
Graphics is all GAF talks about regardless about if thread is about graphics or not, you have thread about gameplay but 90% of the post is whining about graphics.
Is that why when Resident Evil 4 Remake demo came out GAF called the game worse remake ever made even worse than RE3R because of graphics?
If my standard is low for enjoying games like Armored Core VI and Elden Ring despite not having high tech graphics then fine by me....I take that over games like Horizon even with all that tech he actual game was underwhelming and thats not something you can fix wth patches.
You might as well list Kojima too if you're going to pick all of the rare examples instead of the average examples lol.
You say this but go check out the thread when they show off the gameplay for both games for first time, I remember people called Armored Core VI high res PS2 game.
Actually found the demo quite refreshing after the disaster that was ffxvi
Yeah, the guy's argument falls apart against clear cut evidence of other games simply blowing this out of the water and running 6 60fps (horizon zero dawn for instance, which although was a nightmare at release, was cleaned up and looked stunning). The only thing holding back performance is talent, management, and rushing, the ps5 is not the problem
Cloud is busy climbing down a ladder slowly. Meanwhile the party just floats or drops down. It was a bit off putting for sure.
The demo argument is silly when it releases so close to the game's launch. Interestingly enough, the main issues people complained about in the FF16 demo (performance mode) were identical in the final release.I never quite know what to make of some of these complaints, especially based on a demo. I remember seeing a similar narrative on GAF when the FF16 demo dropped, and yet the final game seemed fine to me. Maybe I need to update my ocular firmware.
If these "idiots" weren't complaining, you'd still get a crap experience with barely any patches 6 months later.
Looks nice, looking forward to seeing the rest of the game world.Just play in graphics mode:
I guess you can rule out Dragons Dogma 2 as well then considering it has no 60fps option at all and the 30fps mode looks very choppy. At least with this you're getting a smooth 60fps mode...
But the game is complete and not advertised as early access. Also in this case it's not about features but performance/graphics.
Go play the original psx versión then.
Biggest problems seem to be art related with character models-lighting just being off. Cloud's face looks like a different person regardless of mode on console, I doubt PC would be any different, that's not something you can just brute-force with more power. I just hope it's a demo thing that is fixed in the release, but the chances are not looking good.
No judder on my end but I'm not playing on a shitty oled that makes 30 fps unplayable
Looks absolutely fine in cutscenes. He's not looking just different, he's looking like meme cloud. The screenshots posted in the OP might be zoomed in, but I noticed the problem instantly at regular camera distance, which is pretty far. He just look like somebody forgot to finish modeling his face.
nvm wrong post
