I don't know what you're trying to achieve in your comment. I'm not a sole focal point for appeasing your issues with GAF as a whole. But perhaps be mindful that you're whining a lot yourself, about others whining. Which to me is a poor way of trivialising others opinions. If you're trying to win me over in why I shouldn't critique the game technically. Sorry, my view is my view. Look on the brightside and count yourself lucky, you're happy with the demo, so have a game catered for your expectations to look forward to. Enjoy.Graphics is all GAF talks about regardless about if thread is about graphics or not, you have thread about gameplay but 90% of the post is whining about graphics.
Is that why when Resident Evil 4 Remake demo came out GAF called the game worse remake ever made even worse than RE3R because of graphics?
We been thorough this shit over and over again with every fucking game that comes out and I bet you anything when Monster Hunter Wild demo comes out people still going to whine about the graphics
This is being marketed as a top tier exclusive and coming with a top tier price. If you're telling me to lower my expectations just because SE, then don't worry they're already lowered after FFXVI.You might as well list Kojima too if you're going to pick all of the rare examples instead of the average examples lol.
GT7 also has the entire budget and manpower of PS Studios behind it by the way.
This is being marketed as a top tier exclusive and coming with a top tier price. If you're telling me to lower my expectations just because SE, then don't worry they're already lowered after FFXVI.
I thought I was the only that wondered where dude pulled that bs time line fromLol there won't be any PC version in 3 months.
That's when the exclusivity period ends, but yeah, unlikely for a PC version to be released by that time.I thought I was the only that wondered where dude pulled that bs time line from![]()
The demo argument is silly when it releases so close to the game's launch. Interestingly enough, the main issues people complained about in the FF16 demo (performance mode) were identical in the final release.
I just don't see what's wrong with pointing out problems and making the developers aware. Worst case scenario, nothing happens and the game releases as is. Complaining has helped fix many games that released with problems, it boggles the mind tha some users are actively against it.
If these "idiots" weren't complaining, you'd still get a crap experience with barely any patches 6 months later.
No wait, if those "idiots" didn't buy games day one, there wouldn't be games for you to play at all after a while.
Playing on an LCD too, they need some motion blur to make the 30fps bearable.No judder on my end but I'm not playing on a shitty oled that makes 30 fps unplayable![]()
If they're going to teleport companions as many games do, do it behind your back!Cloud is busy climbing down a ladder slowly. Meanwhile the party just floats or drops down. It was a bit off putting for sure.
Just select the 30 fps mode.
![]()
The issue with that when I got the flat face issue is was when I was fighting the mantis boss thing near the end of the demo... and it was in a cave. So I don't think it's lighting for this specific type of sky, I think it's just going to be an issue in general for the game.
I would love to be wrong but I did laugh when I pulled off the ultimate bro attack and it zoomed in on clouds flat looking face... I remember they showed that in the trailers, but I don't remember it looking weird there.
to be specifically, more like custom modified version of UE4.Still UE4??
Damn
I will play this day 1 even if it's 144p
Keep pre-ordering guys!
Sony cash unfortunately.Fuck whoever decided for this game not to release on PC day 1.
Working overtime?RE4 on PS2 called, it wants its farmhouse textures for the Bitores Mendez boss fight area back.
![]()
Working overtime?
Replaying RDR2 right now and it looks much better than these screenshots. I don't think it's a hardware problem.
Agreed. I don't think Square has ever been known for their technical optimization. Just seeing people blame the console hardware, and I don't think it's completely at fault. I believe other studios could reach this level of fidelity and scale without sacrificing so much.Playing the actual game and looking on screenshota on an early build isnt the same tho.
Agreed. I don't think Square has ever been known for their technical optimization. Just seeing people blame the console hardware, and I don't think it's completely at fault. I believe other studios could reach this level of fidelity and scale without sacrificing so much.
Agreed. I don't think Square has ever been known for their technical optimization. Just seeing people blame the console hardware, and I don't think it's completely at fault. I believe other studios could reach this level of fidelity and scale without sacrificing so much.
I didn't want to play the demo before full version so I don't know how it looks.RE4 on PS2 called, it wants its farmhouse textures for the Bitores Mendez boss fight area back.
![]()
I didn't want to play the demo before full version so I don't know how it looks.
But I bet 1000% that the shots on here are probably cherry picked... right ?
No. You will encounter several dozen instances of absolutely awful assets and lighting if you actually explore the demo. Any impressions to the contrary are from people B-lining through the demo on their 50" 1080p TV from 12 feet away.I didn't want to play the demo before full version so I don't know how it looks.
But I bet 1000% that the shots on here are probably cherry picked... right ?
They cut the polygon budget by 10...
Cloud looks like life have been sucked from him, and that materia on the ground... definitely nothing wrong happening.![]()
I didn't want to play the demo before full version so I don't know how it looks.
But I bet 1000% that the shots on here are probably cherry picked... right ?
Just take it easy, it’s just FOMO kicking in tricking you to think you need to be there day 1. They’ll patch it for a couple months anyway. Playing day 1 hasn’t been great for quite some time. I’m going with the PC version.Having an RTX 4090 and having to play a game on a PS5 is a kick in the balls.
No I think the actual game will look better and some of the haters are people who defense actually bad looking games.
I didn't want to play the demo before full version so I don't know how it looks.
But I bet 1000% that the shots on here are probably cherry picked... right ?
They are and it's a demo. The final game will 100% look better than this.
Its the start of the full game though, and your progression stays. Like FFXVI. I don't remember if that game was updated from its demo.
Just take it easy, it’s just FOMO kicking in tricking you to think you need to be there day 1. They’ll patch it for a couple months anyway. Playing day 1 hasn’t been great for quite some time. I’m going with the PC version.
I believe the exclusivity contract is for 39nths but square doesn't launch their games when exclusivity ends generally. Under the old CEO they would be lazy and conjure up a half assed PC port much later despite "taking their time". The new CEO seems intent on changing everything so who knows if that will continue.Oh, I thought it was coming in may?
Must have got confused
This is made by the part of the kingdom hearts and FF7R teams which both worked on UE4. Luminous was the FF15, Forespoken and FF14 (forked version of luminous) teams.John is saying 1440p, but NXGamer's tweet is saying 1080p (well, he says '1080p is not the problem', likely in reference to the low resolution not being the only problem)
Post process is done in half/quarter resolutions as a resource saving measure, you can't tell me Square couldn't push more out of the hardware using UE4 than this ... if that's the case, maybe they should have stuck to Luminous.