They skipped the Wii U because they thought it was an add-on for the Wii. But they turned out for the Switch.Like I said, that userbase didn't migrate to the next generation.
Actually, no. The OP personally added it for some reason.Is this the same "outrage" that gets reported on and it's a single tweet from someone with 5 followers?
LOL. I play games, not hardware, and am mostly platform agnostic. And generally couldn't care less, other than just pointing out that you added the last part of the sentence in the thread title purely to start something, for no reason.It's clear that you're a seething Nintendo fan who wants us to think otherwise.
You can't fool me, warrior.
Who would be mad about this? Huge Nintendo fan, do not care what console sells the most.
dude, smelly girls are the best thing about modern gaming.its because even smelly girls are allowed to play games these days
There should be. But if you look at his other posts, he's clearly going out of his way to be shitty about basically everything, so it's just his MO, I guess.Actually, no. The OP personally added it for some reason.
Isn’t this sort of console warrior trolling bullshit against the rules here?
You should be.....
I still care about how Sony killed SEGA and I'm in my 40s. I'm sure some 40+ weebs out there are raging.SNES fans are 40+ now. Doubt they care.
I do remember how expensive the games were though.
The same ones crying about PalworldWhere are these "raging" Nintendo fans?
I haven't seen them.
Oh shit. Xbox and Sony fans are about to be raging....hard raging!Xbox One and NES are this year
Xbox 360 and PS3 at the end of next year.
I'm not sure that's right.The size of the gaming market now has grown literal orders of magnitudes in size since the early 90s. This shouldn't be surprising to anyone. Back then the gaming market was limited primarily to geeky kids, and now it's all of us and all of our kids plus people that we've picked up along the way. Nintendo had a bigger cut of the market as a percentage than Sony does even today, which is the only real meaningful metric here.
Yeah I shouldn’t have used literal there I’ll own that. My point was more or less that the market is massively bigger.I'm not sure that's right.
An order of magnitude is approximately 10 times the size of a thing (number times 10 to the first power). Google tells me that the size of the gaming market by revenue in 1990 was $17.9 billion. Adjusted for inflation to 2023 dollars that's $41.7 billion. Google then tells me that the size of the video game market by revenue in 2023 was $187.7 billion. That's actually ~0.45 orders of magnitude when you adjust for inflation.
I guess if you didn't adjust for inflation you could say that the growth was ~1.04 orders of magnitude. "Literal orders" could be fudging since "orders" implies more than one whole order of magnitude and .04 orders of magnitude at this scale is pretty much statistically zero. So you could say the gaming market has grown a little over one literal order of magnitude since 1990 if we don't care about inflation and we're creating an infographic or something. But not literal orders of magnitude. The next one up would be 10 to the second power and the video game market hasn't grown to 100 times the size it was in 1990.
Depends where the smell is coming from matedude, smelly girls are the best thing about modern gaming.
The gaming market is much much bigger now than it was in the early 90s.
You can thank Nintendo and the Wii for that.
The console that killed Xbox.I agree percent.
Even if the PS5 ends up with lofty hardware numbers, I wonder what will its overall legacy be?
The console everyone bought for Spidey Man?
Just the first of many milestones. PS5 will outsell PS4 lifetime, and be the PS console which will become the closest seller to PS2