Not like Michigan was much of a contest, but still.
How many 'home states' can one candidate lose?
Not like Michigan was much of a contest, but still.
Nasir Dow Jones
Nope. And it is pretty much a blessing because your TV & Radio doesn't become a vast hate machine spewing negative ads.and are theses states actively campaigned in at all?
State polls lag national polls.
Regardless 14 points is a hell of a lead in a "Swing" state.
Current national (let alone state) polls also don't including the 47% comment, which hits Romney harder then Romney's Libya bullshit.
Anybody find my prediction that 2012 would match 2008? It's true, but I was laughed off.
I can't believe that Wisconsin poll. If that's true then that's insane. Romney and his superPACs are bombarding Obama like mad here, and there's pretty much 0 pushback on the TV from Obama. If he's still winning by a lot, then there's no way Romney's taking this state.
I am seriously going to put forth the thought that the more commercials put on TV above a certain point, the less people like a candidate.
The Romney SuperPAC ads are totally devoid of substance. They have no effect whatsoever. You'd get more people to vote Romney by not playing those ads.
I am seriously going to put forth the thought that the more commercials put on TV above a certain point, the less people like a candidate.
I was visiting my parents in Michigan last week and during their local network news broadcast, nearly ever commercial was a political commercial. It was infuriating.
I am seriously going to put forth the thought that the more commercials put on TV above a certain point, the less people like a candidate.
I was visiting my parents in Michigan last week and during their local network news broadcast, nearly ever commercial was a political commercial. It was infuriating.
I am seriously going to put forth the thought that the more commercials put on TV above a certain point, the less people like a candidate.
I was visiting my parents in Michigan last week and during their local network news broadcast, nearly ever commercial was a political commercial. It was infuriating.
Nate/538 article on polling discrepancies:
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytime...ks-stronger-in-polls-that-include-cellphones/
Posted? If so...sorry
We in California call it the Whitman-effect.
Also ... being in California I am glad I don't have to be bombarded by hate ads for the presidential campaigns.
The TV ads must have some effect, otherwise why run them.
Why is New Mexico a safe Obama state when it is surrounded by Arizona, Texas, Utah, and Oklahoma? Seems a bit odd.
% of Latinos.Why is New Mexico a safe Obama state when it is surrounded by Arizona, Texas, Utah, and Oklahoma? Seems a bit odd.
Persons of Hispanic or Latino Origin, percent, 2011 (b) 46.7%
Persons of Hispanic or Latino Origin, percent, 2011 (b) 46.7%
Is Arizona significantly whiter? Also: does this explain Arizona's horrific immigration policies?
Is Arizona significantly whiter? Also: does this explain Arizona's horrific immigration policies?
Why is New Mexico a safe Obama state when it is surrounded by Arizona, Texas, Utah, and Oklahoma? Seems a bit odd.
New Mexico is the state with the highest ratio of Hispanics, 44.7%. Next are California and Texas, with 35.9% and 35.6%, respectively
I've found that being overly-optimistic on Democrats' chances proves me right half of the time.Now now. Aaron Strife is here to console you.
Wow the RNC responded to that poll
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/rnc-responds-to-marquette-poll-showing-obama-up
Haha
Atlas Shrugged 2: One Hour LaterMary Matalin: Americans Want To Debate 'Producers And Parasites'
Is that a new Ayn Rand RPG?
michael-steele.jpg[/img]
"Miss me yet?"
I've been wondering about cell phones and how that affected polling. Honestly I don't know a single person under like 40 that has a landline.
Well, after that "Voyeur" scandal they kinda had to."Miss me yet?"
The RNC made a big mistake dumping Michael Steele.
Standing in line for Obama tickets. It's pretty damned long.
Is the rally today?
I'm fully convinced that the "redistribution" clip was the GOP's October surprise. They need to fire their oppo research guys. All they have is a 14 year old clip and other stuff taken out of context lol.
I can't believe that Wisconsin poll. If that's true then that's insane. Romney and his superPACs are bombarding Obama like mad here, and there's pretty much 0 pushback on the TV from Obama. If he's still winning by a lot, then there's no way Romney's taking this state.
Holy crap. He's dodging like crazy there. He's trying to play a nice guy while silently acknowledging he totally does think that half this nation are moochers.
I agree with this. I think they assumed, as I did, that this would be a close race going into October, and they'd drop the video in late September so ensure it was brought up in the first debate. Now...madness and stupidity, as Tywin Lannister would say. I bet they were planning on releasing it next week under normal circumstances
The video is just a redux of the Joe The Plumper stuff. That came out before one of the debates and had no impact.
I'm fully convinced that the "redistribution" clip was the GOP's October surprise. They need to fire their oppo research guys. All they have is a 14 year old clip and other stuff taken out of context lol.
Fox News: Florida Obama 49 Romney 44
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/19/us-usa-campaign-poll-idUSBRE88I1E920120919A Reuters/Ipsos poll released on Wednesday showed that more than two in five registered voters, or 43 percent, viewed Romney less favorably after an excerpt of the video was shown to them online.
In the video, Romney portrayed Democratic President Barack Obama's supporters - which he said was 47 percent of the electorate - as people who live off government handouts and do not "care for their lives."
Nearly six in ten, or 59 percent, in the poll said they felt Romney unfairly dismissed almost half of Americans as victims in his remarks made to donors in May at a private event at a luxury home in Florida.
"This isn't great for Romney," said Ipsos pollster Julia Clark, who called the video an image problem for the Republican.
"This type of issue, a gaffe or an indiscreet remark by a candidate, has an effect on a candidate's image, but it is not the kind of thing that decides how people vote on Election Day," she said.
A Reuters/Ipsos tracking poll taken over the previous four days showed Obama ahead of the former private equity executive by 5 points among likely voters on Wednesday, up slightly from a 4-point lead on Tuesday. If elections were held today, Obama would win 48 percent of the vote to Romney's 43 percent, the poll showed.
There was some good news for Romney. Forty-one percent of the respondents to the poll about the video clip felt the former Massachusetts governor was making an important point about the U.S. government.
And 26 percent said his remarks made them feel more favorable about Romney, with less than seven weeks to go before the election.
More than a quarter of those who viewed the tape - 27 percent - said they felt Romney was being unfairly attacked for a private statement to his own supporters. But 73 percent disagreed, saying all his comments should be subject to public scrutiny because he is a presidential candidate.
Romney targeted 47 percent of voters in his comments, but a large majority in the poll - 67 percent - said they identified more with the people he was talking about than with the wealthy donors he was addressing.
Thirty three percent of respondents identified more with Romney's audience at the $50,000 per person fundraising dinner.
The poll surveyed 1,197 likely voters about their voting intentions from September 15-19. There were 869 registered voters polled about the video.
The precision of the Reuters/Ipsos online polls is measured using a credibility interval. In this case, the poll has a credibility interval of 3.2 percentage points for likely voters, and 3.8 points for the registered voters who answered the video questions.