Because otherwise he actual returns would probably show the Swiss bank accountsWhy a summary of those ten years?
Because otherwise he actual returns would probably show the Swiss bank accountsWhy a summary of those ten years?
If you consider the Mormon Church a charitable donation.
If Romney can use this to pivot to a discussion about charity it could be a winner. He has given more to charity than Obama has by far. 30% to the 47%. That's a big story. I think Mitt is killing two birds with one stone here
If Romney can use this to pivot to a discussion about charity it could be a winner. He has given more to charity than Obama has by far. 30% to the 47%. That's a big story. I think Mitt is killing two birds with one stone here
The church reserves the right to use donations like fast offerings for anything it wants.depends on if he gave his donations as tithing or as part of one of the humanitarian efforts of the church. The former is used for maintaining the church and its offices, the latter is a force for good in any terms you can think of.
Summary, he's hiding the rest.
A sanitized summary of his tax returns.
So the pluses and minuses:
- Get to talk about wealth and tax rates again! Whee for the jobs message
- Bring Mormonism to the forefront
- Raises more questions than it answers (so why not just release all the actual tax returns, Mitt?)
+ Sort of discredits Reid (but not really because it's a summary)
+ Talking point "look I release my tax information"
The Romneys’ generous charitable donations in 2011 would have significantly reduced their tax obligation for the year. The Romneys thus limited their deduction of charitable contributions to conform to the Governor's statement in August, based upon the January estimate of income, that he paid at least 13% in income taxes in each of the last 10 years.
I don’t pay more than are legally due and frankly if I had paid more than are legally due I don’t think I’d be qualified to become president. I’d think people would want me to follow the law and pay only what the tax code requires.
The church reserves the right to use donations like fast offerings for anything it wants.
The church can do anything it wants for any purpose. That doesn't stop them from actually donating millions and millions of man hours to important causes.
If Romney can use this to pivot to a discussion about charity it could be a winner. He has given more to charity than Obama has by far. 30% to the 47%. That's a big story. I think Mitt is killing two birds with one stone here
Or billions in business ventures.The church can do anything it wants for any purpose. That doesn't stop them from actually donating millions and millions of man hours to important causes.
Or billions in business ventures.
As well as millions and millions to stop gay marriage
Bush increased aid to Africa.Honestly, some of you guys just can't see the good in anything.
Irrespective of twisted your argument becomes, this cannot be a winner for Romney. Under no circumstances.If Romney can use this to pivot to a discussion about charity it could be a winner. He has given more to charity than Obama has by far. 30% to the 47%. That's a big story. I think Mitt is killing two birds with one stone here
Ultimately, Romney's efforts are futile. It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God. Have you seen any camels passing through the eye of a needle lately? Poor guy.$1.5 million of that is a tithe. Take that figure out -- 2.5 million out of 14 million is 17%.
edit: Not saying that donating to LDS is not charitable, but it's worth noting that tithing is, in some sense, not a voluntary contribution for Romney.
It is true that a good debate, especially a good first one, can invigorate a candidate and lead to increased confidence, which can prompt good decisions and sensible statements. There is more than a month between the first debate and the voting: That's enough time for a healthy spiral to begin.
But: The Romney campaign has to get turned around. This week I called it incompetent, but only because I was being polite. I really meant "rolling calamity."
A lot of people weighed in, in I suppose expected ways: "Glad you said this," "Mad you said this." But, some surprises. No one that I know of defended the campaign or argued "you're missing some of its quiet excellence." Instead there was broad agreement with the gist of the critiquefrom some in the midlevel of the campaign itself, from outside backers and from various party activists and officials. There was a perhaps pessimistic assumption that no one in Boston would be open to advice. A veteran of a previous Romney campaign who supports the governor and admires him"This is a good man"said the candidate's problem isn't overconfidence, it's a tin ear. That's hard to change, the veteran said, because tin-earness keeps you from detecting and remedying tin-earness.
Summary has been released. Looks like the embarrassing part is in the shelters.
Of course.Summary has been released. Looks like the embarrassing part is in the shelters.
Summary has been released. Looks like the embarrassing part is in the shelters.
If Romney can use this to pivot to a discussion about charity it could be a winner. He has given more to charity than Obama has by far. 30% to the 47%. That's a big story. I think Mitt is killing two birds with one stone here
Link?
If Romney can use this to pivot to a discussion about charity it could be a winner. He has given more to charity than Obama has by far. 30% to the 47%. That's a big story. I think Mitt is killing two birds with one stone here
Another nice ad. I hope this is airing in Florida
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0WmdCjHF1I&feature=g-all-u
The VP debate means little, but I wonder if Ryan will try and hit Biden on it. What would he say if Ryan asked him directly "Explain to the American people why you donate so little to charity?"
why would he release any tax information right now . . . what does he have to gain other than distracting from the 47% comment?
the romney campaign has been in reactive mode for such a long time. what a bunch of losers.
The VP debate means little, but I wonder if Ryan will try and hit Biden on it. What would he say if Ryan asked him directly "Explain to the American people why you donate so little to charity?"
why would he release any tax information right now . . . what does he have to gain other than distracting from the 47% comment?
the romney campaign has been in reactive mode for such a long time. what a bunch of losers.
I don't actually think it's about what he has to gain -- but he promised to release the returns before the election, and he'd really prefer to do it before it gets too close. That's why he's trying to dump it. He has to get it out of the way.
He promised to release 2011 returns, so it needed to be done before the debates. No better time then a Friday afternoon right?
The VP debate means little, but I wonder if Ryan will try and hit Biden on it. What would he say if Ryan asked him directly "Explain to the American people why you donate so little to charity?"
Has anyone in the media asked Romney "Did you take advantage of the IRS tax amnesty program in 2009 for hiding assets overseas"?
If Romney can use this to pivot to a discussion about charity it could be a winner. He has given more to charity than Obama has by far. 30% to the 47%. That's a big story. I think Mitt is killing two birds with one stone here
The Romneys’ generous charitable donations in 2011 would have significantly reduced their tax obligation for the year. The Romneys thus limited their deduction of charitable contributions to conform to the Governor’s statement in August, based upon the January estimate of income, that he paid at least 13% in income taxes in each of the last 10 years.
Not in that way - here is a better line, if he can make it without being a rich schmuck about it: "Look, the President can say all he wants about those comments from last May. The fact is, I have given away over 30% of my income to help the the people he says I don't care about. Conversely, he hasn't given a dime to his own half brother who lives in poverty in Kenya.
Not in that way - here is a better line, if he can make it without being a rich schmuck about it: "Look, the President can say all he wants about those comments from last May. The fact is, I have given away over 30% of my income to help the the people he says I don't care about. Conversely, he hasn't given a dime to his own half brother who lives in poverty in Kenya."
Not in that way - here is a better line, if he can make it without being a rich schmuck about it: "Look, the President can say all he wants about those comments from last May. The fact is, I have given away over 30% of my income to help the the people he says I don't care about. Conversely, he hasn't given a dime to his own half brother who lives in poverty in Kenya."
No one has the balls to do so unfortunately. Though these returns might open the door.
Romney was supposed to release 2011 tax returns around now, right? Maybe they bumped it up a week cuz of the 47% stuff. This "summary" smells like it was prepared before this week, too, so it isn't a direct reaction to the 47% video.
That said, the Romney campaign continues to think the electorate is mentally handicapped if a "summary" is going to be enough that seeing the actual returns. Especially regarding the Swiss account.
Foxnews.com said:CAMPAIGN SAYS ROMNEY AVERAGED 20 PERCENT EFFECTIVE TAX RATE OVER TWO DECADES
Not in that way - here is a better line, if he can make it without being a rich schmuck about it: "Look, the President can say all he wants about those comments from last May. The fact is, I have given away over 30% of my income to help the the people he says I don't care about. Conversely, he hasn't given a dime to his own half brother who lives in poverty in Kenya."
The fact is, I have given away over 30% of my income to help the the people he says I don't care about.