Hobbestetrician
Member
96.4% on the Now-Cast.
That graph is amazing.
96.4% on the Now-Cast.
Reminds me of this, from the 2008 race. Drudge was simply losing it at this point.
I found it in my Photobucket account, but I recall snagging it around this time in the last cycle, though I think it was during the debates so that would have put it in October.
Poll denialism didn't work out too well last time, either.
I guarantee you the unfavorable rating of Romney isn't even close to the unfavorable rating of Dubya in 2000.Gore was leading Bush in September, Kerry led or tied Bush in September...
Off topic but would anyone recommend Game Change (the book)? I saw the HBO movie which was pretty good.
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/judge-suggests-pennsylvania-voter-id-law-could-be"I think it's possible there could be an injunction entered here," Simpson said Tuesday, according to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. "I need some input from people who have been thinking about this longer than I have."
Gore was leading Bush in September, Kerry led or tied Bush in September...
this is reminding me of NH era poligaf. Lots of hubris
Almost at the end of the confidence interval!96.4% on the Now-Cast.
Off topic but would anyone recommend Game Change (the book)? I saw the HBO movie which was pretty good.
Gore was leading Bush in September, Kerry led or tied Bush in September...
this is reminding me of NH era poligaf. Lots of hubris
Dewey is the only one who led at this point in the polls and didn't win the popular vote.
Gore and Kerry were uninspiring politicians that even their own bases begrudgingly voted for. Also, the Republicans hadn't shattered the country's economy yet. I'm not saying that this is a done deal by any stretch, but Obama isn't Kerry or Gore, and the Republican party of 2012 doesn't have the same favor ability as the Republican party of 2000 and 2004
If Obama is reelected and gets to preside over the inevitable recovery, he will be our Reagan. Republicans can look forward to us never shutting up about him for several decades.
If Obama is reelected and gets to preside over the inevitable recovery, he will be our Reagan.
When was the last time we had a Presidential race where one candidate never led at any point whatsoever?
A terrible president that ends up being deified?
I see Clinton ahead handily on both sides of that chart.Dole '96?
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2...as-not-raised-taxes----yet.php?ref=fpnewsfeed“I admit this, he has one thing he did not do in his first four years, he’s said he’s going to do in his next four years, which is to raise taxes,” Romney told a crowd at a campaign stop in Vandalia, Ohio.“
I guarantee you the unfavorable rating of Romney isn't even close to the unfavorable rating of Dubya in 2000.
Judge Suggests Pennsylvania Voter ID Law Could Be Blocked
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/judge-suggests-pennsylvania-voter-id-law-could-be
When was the last time we had a Presidential race where one candidate never led at any point whatsoever?
If Obama is reelected and gets to preside over the inevitable recovery, he will be our Reagan. Republicans can look forward to us never shutting up about him for several decades.
Gore was leading Bush in September, Kerry led or tied Bush in September...
this is reminding me of NH era poligaf. Lots of hubris
What was Huckabee's reason for not running again? woulda blown away Romney in the primaries.
What was Huckabee's reason for not running again? woulda blown away Romney in the primaries.
What was Huckabee's reason for not running again? woulda blown away Romney in the primaries.
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/20...xes----yet.php
So Mitt has shaken up the etch-a-sketch and is now admitting that Obama hasn't raised taxes in his first term.
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/09/mitt-romney-obama-has-not-raised-taxes----yet.php
So Mitt has shaken up the etch-a-sketch and is now admitting that Obama hasn't raised taxes in his first term.
PD has a point though. Bush had a 5.6 pt lead at this point in 2004 and ended up winning by 1.5 pts cos Kerry destroyed him in the debates. Obama is only up 3.7 and even a little slip-up can erase that with 41 days to go
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...2_vs_election_2004_eight_years_ago_today.html
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...bama_vs_romney_compared_to_bush_vs_kerry.html
PD has a point though. Bush had a 5.6 pt lead at this point in 2004 and ended up winning by 1.5 pts cos Kerry destroyed him in the debates. Obama is only up 3.7 and even a little slip-up can erase that with 41 days to go
Mitt Romney: Obama Has Not Raised Taxes
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2...as-not-raised-taxes----yet.php?ref=fpnewsfeed
Sure, but this is assuming Romney's even capable of destroying anyone in a debate, and I've yet to see any evidence of that.
If you look at the video, Ryan grimaces lol
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/09/romney-obama-did-not-raise-taxes/
President Obama has raised taxes on millions of middle-class Americans during his first term in office, spokeswoman Amanda Henneberg said in a statement. Governor Romney was clearly communicating about an additional tax increase President Obama is proposing on American small businesses that will jeopardize over 700,000 jobs. Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan will stop the Presidents tax increases, create 12 million new jobs, and turn our economy around.
Didn't wanna give up his sweet sweet egg nog.
Oh hey a correction from the Romney campaign:
From that link you posted
He was thrown off by Rick Perry.Sure, but this is assuming Romney's even capable of destroying anyone in a debate, and I've yet to see any evidence of that.
What was Huckabee's reason for not running again? woulda blown away Romney in the primaries.
PD has a point though. Bush had a 5.6 pt lead at this point in 2004 and ended up 1.5 pts in the final polls cos Kerry destroyed him in the debates. Obama is only up 3.7 and even a little slip-up can erase that with 41 days to go
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...2_vs_election_2004_eight_years_ago_today.html
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...bama_vs_romney_compared_to_bush_vs_kerry.html
Oh hey a correction from the Romney campaign:
From that link you posted
Dewey is the only one who led at this point in the polls and didn't win the popular vote.
If you look at the video, Ryan grimaces lol
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/09/romney-obama-did-not-raise-taxes/
In the head-to-head contest, Obama leads Romney among likely voters, 49 percent to 43 percent, even as 60 percent of Americans say the nation is headed off on the wrong track as the president completes his first term.
God damn hilarious. You wouldn't mind if I snag and post that picture around, would you?
ouch.
Makes sense. A lot of progressives and liberals would also say the nation is headed on the wrong track (too much money in the political system, and civil liberties being thrown under the bus no matter who's in)