thanks. is there anything I can show to my dad? When I tried to tell him that that 2016 movie was supposed to be full of fallacies and inaccuracies and stuff like that, he said "Well of course the liberal media would say that." Or is there just no hope at all?
again, thanks
I'll just drop this here. Consider it your disturbing image for the day, found on DU. hehe..
Silver concludes the 47% remarks caused real damage.
I'm sure if you unskew those they'd go in opposite directions.
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/09/todd-akin-rick-tyler-its-working.php?ref=fpnewsfeed
So this photo was in an article from many pages back, not the most flattering for Romney
It's amazing how people are still falling for the onion.Iran's State News service runs Onion article.
:lol
Romney is correct by technicality. He wasn't in favor of liquidation. But Romney errs in a different way: letting GM go bankrupt, in an environment where credit was scarce, very well might have meant the liquidizing of significant GM assets. He's constructing an alternate history in which GM clears chapter 11 without government assistance, but the entire reason why the loans were offered in the first place is that GM might not have survived bankruptcy intact. According to a NY Times article:
How could you ever forget? Mitt luv da kidz.
Somone should do a parody filled with all sorts of pop psychology about an anti-anti-colonial self-hating Indian guy who abandoned his country, abandoned his religion, married a white lady, and is completely for oppressing brown people.
That was a trip to the drycleaners. I sad gatdam.
I saw his piece on how Ohio was giving Obama a larger lead than nationally, but because this ran counter to previous margin trends in past elections he wasn't trusting of it.
:lol
I have no idea what is in the 2016 movie other than hearing about how it is based on silly pseudo-pschology about how Obama is rabidly anti-American because of his father and his father's anti-colonial views. Yeah, like Obama is some manchurian candidate based on a father that effectively abandoned him. It is more likely that he would be against what ever his father was for.
that's a good idea. I don't actually discuss this kind of thing with my dad very often though as it would lead to a big argument and my dad argues for a living so it wouldn't end well
Maher isn't really part of the traditional media except for the fact that he's a political commentator, which anybody can be provided they have a platform from which to speak. As such, it's incredibly tendentious to dismiss Maher like that. It's almost like arguing, "D'Souza is a hack. Of course he would say hackish things." But that doesn't really address anything either person is saying.
I know, but he would still dismiss Maher out of handMaher isn't really part of the traditional media except for the fact that he's a political commentator, which anybody can be provided they have a platform from which to speak. As such, it's incredibly tendentious to dismiss Maher like that. It's almost like arguing, "D'Souza is a hack. Of course he would say hackish things." But that doesn't really address anything either person is saying.
Maher brings up good points. Unfortunately, he kind of lets D'Souza go when D'Souza attempts to absolve Bush of blame for the national debt. Most of the deficit is the product of things that occurred under Bush: the tax cuts, the two wars, and the financial crisis.
Iran's State News service runs Onion article.
:lol
I can't recall did McCain inject it or was it just dumbass supporters?
