cartoon_soldier
Member
Romney to get more specific in debate?
http://www.buzzfeed.com/zekejmiller/romney-to-provide-tax-details-aide-says
http://www.buzzfeed.com/zekejmiller/romney-to-provide-tax-details-aide-says
Romney to get more specific in debate?
http://www.buzzfeed.com/zekejmiller/romney-to-provide-tax-details-aide-says
Romney to get more specific in debate?
http://www.buzzfeed.com/zekejmiller/romney-to-provide-tax-details-aide-says
Romney to get more specific in debate?
http://www.buzzfeed.com/zekejmiller/romney-to-provide-tax-details-aide-says
Lol wtf? What the hell is that supposed to mean?
EDIT: Damn I got Onion'd. What's it say about the Romney campaign that I believe it though?
Romney to get more specific in debate?
http://www.buzzfeed.com/zekejmiller/romney-to-provide-tax-details-aide-says
Aside from the two already linked, there's also VoteEasy.Does anyone have any good political test for determining leanings and ideal candidate? I'm looking at a few right now. One of my coworkers just became an American citizen, and he's getting all sorts of terrible answers from everyone else and I don't want to give him too many answers because I'm not as informed as I'd like to be.
Romney to get more specific in debate?
http://www.buzzfeed.com/zekejmiller/romney-to-provide-tax-details-aide-says
Haven't they said this before? He was suppose to get more detailed during one speech that was on TV. Then again at the RNC. Then again on campaign stops in general. Strange how they expect people to believe he'll get more specific now. It's a cry wolf situation.
Obama Approval Ratings Go UpIt's not his job to worry about those people.
Haven't they said this before? He was suppose to get more detailed during one speech that was on TV. Then again at the RNC. Then again on campaign stops in general. Strange how they expect people to believe he'll get more specific now. It's a cry wolf situation.
Lol wtf? What the hell is that supposed to mean?
EDIT: Damn I got Onion'd. What's it say about the Romney campaign that I believe it though?
That was fake? Ugh you can never tell with these people. She recently went to a "Conservative" Jewish synagogue and totally messed that up trying to pander to the wrong audience.Something something about the current conservative movement being impossible to satirize because you can't make their positions any more outrageous something something.
There was a fake article the other day about Bachmann wanting to ban falafel and other "jihadi foods" that was barely discernible as parody.
Although there is some truth to it (otherwise the Onion would not have written it) the fact that you believed the last line suggest to me that you live in a liberal bubble.
to be honest, I too read the article with the assumption that it was a straight news piece. The first portion seemed admirable if perhaps a bit insulting to the people that live in these places, the 6PM line seemed strange but didn't alert me to the fact that I was reading satire, but the gated community line made me check for the Onion immediately
Romney's real chance to introduce himself will be in his concession speech.
Favorability of the Democratic and Republican parties are diverging, according to a poll released Wednesday from ABC News and the Washington Post. The survey of 1,024 adults showed that 49 percent perceived the Democratic party as favorable, with 42 seeing it as unfavorable. Thirty-nine percent of those surveyed viewed the Republican party favorably, with 53 percent viewing it unfavorably.
Aside from the two already linked, there's also VoteEasy.
Romney's real chance to introduce himself will be in his concession speech.
I like to see this as a proxy for how they'll do on the generic ballot. Dems have a 10 point favorability advantage - if they had a 10 point lead in the Congressional race they'd win for sure. You could even cut that in half and they'd still be even money.http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.c...orabilities-show-stark-difference-between-gop
Poll: Republican, Democratic Party Favorability Ratings Diverge
No, tell them all about how you think Romney will carry Michigan and that you have a bet on some nerd forum and you gotta keep up your e-cred.PhoenixDark said:My parents invited me to watch the debate at the local Obama HQ here; it's a pretty nice place actually. I might be taking my show on the road fellas!
More than likely ill chicken out, stay home, and just eat snacks and watc online
It will be streamed pretty much everywhere (CNN, Fox CSPAN, major channels) and it starts at 9pm eastern.Anywhere to stream the debate tonight?
What time is it again?
It will be streamed pretty much everywhere (CNN, Fox CSPAN, major channels) and it starts at 9pm eastern.
That was fake? Ugh you can never tell with these people. She recently went to a "Conservative" Jewish synagogue and totally messed that up trying to pander to the wrong audience.
>>good debaterI continue to think Romney will have a good debate, and feel you guys are overlooking some basic stuff here. This will be the first time voters get to see Obama and Romney together, and naturally this benefits challengers more than incumbents - assuming the challenger is competent and acceptable. Would anyone here argue Romney will not look and sound competent on stage tonight? He's a good debater and likely will not stumble over his own feet. That alone challenges the basic memes of this election, and I think voters will respond positively to it.
Whether he convinces people on policy grounds remains to be seen, but I think Romney will clearly pass the test of whether he's acceptable tonight.
And to add to this, Obummer won't have his teleprompter telling him what to say and we all know he can't even form the most basic sentences without one.I continue to think Romney will have a good debate, and feel you guys are overlooking some basic stuff here. This will be the first time voters get to see Obama and Romney together, and naturally this benefits challengers more than incumbents - assuming the challenger is competent and acceptable. Would anyone here argue Romney will not look and sound competent on stage tonight? He's a good debater and likely will not stumble over his own feet. That alone challenges the basic memes of this election, and I think voters will respond positively to it.
Whether he convinces people on policy grounds remains to be seen, but I think Romney will clearly pass the test of whether he's acceptable tonight.
I continue to think Romney will have a good debate, and feel you guys are overlooking some basic stuff here. This will be the first time voters get to see Obama and Romney together, and naturally this benefits challengers more than incumbents - assuming the challenger is competent and acceptable. Would anyone here argue Romney will not look and sound competent on stage tonight? He's a good debater and likely will not stumble over his own feet. That alone challenges the basic memes of this election, and I think voters will respond positively to it.
Whether he convinces people on policy grounds remains to be seen, but I think Romney will clearly pass the test of whether he's acceptable tonight.
Our new Missouri Senate poll finds Claire McCaskill leading Todd Akin 46-40 with Libertarian Jonathan Dine at 9%.
Why I still think MO-Sen will be a close race- the 14% of voters undecided or voting Libertarian right now support Romney 66-9.
If Akin wins, it begs the question what does it take to lose?PPP's new Missouri Senate race poll:
PPP's new Missouri Senate race poll:
If Akin wins, it begs the question what does it take to lose?
He almost always looks and sounds competent from certain perspectives. Like yours, for example.Would anyone here argue Romney will not look and sound competent on stage tonight?
He almost always looks and sounds competent from certain perspectives. Like yours, for example.
But, for a full 90 minutes to the entire general audience? That is an as yet unattained goal for Mr. Romney.
PublicPolicyPolling93% of Missouri voters think you can get pregnant from being raped. Not too often we see a 93% on anything, even something this common sense
When we polled MO-Sen in late August Akin's favorability was 33/56. Now it's 33/55. He's not seeing any recovery with time
By a 50/42 margin Missouri voters would rather Republicans had control of the Senate than Democrats. Akin costs them ~14 pts
Despite overall unpopularity, Akin still has 65/23 favorability rating with MO GOPers. Most like him and not just voting for him grudgingly
I'm wondering if the unfiltered Romney exposure will, by itself, do more damage then anything else.
The more people who see Romney, the more they dislike him.
I'm more of a lefty than I thought.
PublicPolicyPolling
I want to know more about that 7%.
I continue to think Romney will have a good debate, and feel you guys are overlooking some basic stuff here. This will be the first time voters get to see Obama and Romney together, and naturally this benefits challengers more than incumbents - assuming the challenger is competent and acceptable. Would anyone here argue Romney will not look and sound competent on stage tonight? He's a good debater and likely will not stumble over his own feet. That alone challenges the basic memes of this election, and I think voters will respond positively to it.
Whether he convinces people on policy grounds remains to be seen, but I think Romney will clearly pass the test of whether he's acceptable tonight.
He needs a Rose Garden strategy, like Ford tried.. but I'm guessing that Obama won't let him borrow the Rose Garden.I'm wondering if the unfiltered Romney exposure will, by itself, do more damage then anything else.
The more people who see Romney, the more they dislike him.
That's an interesting point, and true. But voters will have his opponent right there for comparison, and they'll have to choose. Even if they don't like him, they might determine they like him more than Obama