Does anyone really need to be told, once again, that this debate was NOT a game changer?
Romney will gain in the polls, no doubt, but not change the game. That's the point.
Yea, Romney won this one. Yup. Such a bad result for the president.
Does anyone really need to be told, once again, that this debate was NOT a game changer?
Romney will gain in the polls, no doubt, but not change the game. That's the point.
Obama lost that debate. He was on the defensive and failed to cut through Romney's armor of nonsensical policy.
Nothing to worry about right
How the fuck do you cut through it when he just repeats "Nuh uh" over and over again? The whole thing was maddening. Obama hit him on a few things, and all he could say in return is "Nuh uh, that's untrue, because I said I wouldn't do that." How do you explain that someone's spouting nonsense when they keep doing it?
I'm going to love seeing the polls shift by 1% over the next week.
How the fuck do you cut through it when he just repeats "Nuh uh" over and over again? The whole thing was maddening. Obama hit him on a few things, and all he could say in return is "Nuh uh, that's untrue, because I said I wouldn't do that." How do you explain that someone's spouting nonsense when they keep doing it?
Exactly... it's hard to debate someone who willingly lies and rushes to the center after a year of doing the opposite. The onus is on the media to call that out.
I'm reading a lot of panic from Dems that Obama wasn't aggressive enough. I recall reading the same panic last time around.
The fundamentals of the race were never going to be changed one way or the other, but I am kind of amused by it all. Still, I had hoped Obama would be more aggressive. But that's because I fucking hate Romney.
Romney went from 30 to 63% on that. So,l the gap is now a lot less, 69-63.
Obviously this is among a group of 523 voters, unscientific poll. Will love to see proper poll numbers later.
Exactly... it's hard to debate someone who willingly lies. The onus is on the media to call that out.
Romney went from 30 to 63% on that. So,l the gap is now a lot less, 69-63.
Obviously this is among a group of 523 voters, unscientific poll. Will love to see proper poll numbers later.
We can pretend like debates don't matter, or we can look at the facts.
I'm reading a lot of panic from Dems that Obama wasn't aggressive enough. I recall reading the same panic last time around.
The fundamentals of the race were never going to be changed one way or the other, but I am kind of amused by it all. Still, I had hoped Obama would be more aggressive. But that's because I fucking hate Romney.
Different every timeSo will the mediator be the same next time?
So will the mediator be the same next time?
Candy Crowley from CNN. That'll be focused on foreign policy.
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/10/obama-supporters-which-obama-was-that.phpLook: you know how much I love the guy, and you know how much of a high information viewer I am, and I can see the logic of some of Obamas meandering, weak, professorial arguments, Sullivan said. But this was a disaster for the president for the key people he needs to reach, and his effete, wonkish lectures may have jolted a lot of independents into giving Romney a second look.
Candy Crowley from CNN. That'll be focused on foreign policy.
@BuzzFeedAndrew
CNN poll 67% of voters say Romney won only 22% say Obama won.
Andrew Sullivan summed it up well
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/10/obama-supporters-which-obama-was-that.php
The entire strategy made no sense. Guess what, when Obama comes out the gate next time attacking the general response will be that he's desperate. That's why you set the narrative FIRST, and leave your opponent scrambling for another blueprint.
I'm listening to Plouffe right now saying the strategy was "storytelling" just like at the conventions. A debate is not a convention, what is your problem?
Good.And with that...I am out.
Candy Crowley from CNN. That'll be focused on foreign policy.
And with that...I am out.
Yes, I agree; for all the chicken littles in here, let's look at the facts again, shall we?
Something approaching statistical significance in one case.
How the fuck do you cut through it when he just repeats "Nuh uh" over and over again? The whole thing was maddening. Obama hit him on a few things, and all he could say in return is "Nuh uh, that's untrue, because I said I wouldn't do that." How do you explain that someone's spouting nonsense when they keep doing it?
No, it's not focused on foreign policy. It's a townhall style debate focused on domestic policy with some foreign policy discussion.
The foreign policy debate is October 22
And with that...I am out.
I'm not concerned about national polls.
I'm not concerned about national polls. There are swing states right now that are still determining who to support - that's what I'm concerned about.
I'm not concerned about national polls. There are swing states right now that are still determining who to support - that's what I'm concerned about.
are we supposed to panic yet?
are we supposed to panic yet?
are we supposed to panic yet?
are we supposed to panic yet?
are we supposed to panic yet?