Clinton favorability numbers look very ominous to me. I can't imagine a person winning an election with negative margins that large.
So Bush is a longshot to you, but you think Rand is who it could be?
LOL
I could see it coming down to Walker or Rand. Maybe Cruz, if he can keep his mouth shut. Bush is way to much of a long shot, Perry is already weak. Carson is gaining steam which I didn't see coming, but I don't see him pulling off a huge upset. The rest will bumble their way through the first debates and drop out, or drop out right after their sub-1% vote tallies in the first few states.
Regardless, Rubio will wind up as the VP pick.
A Republican president with a Republican Congress would be disastrous no matter who it is. Might as well go full tilt boogie and risk the 1% chance that Trump wins the presidency.Honestly, I'm enjoying the train wreck as much as the next person, but I get nervous when I think about Trump winning getting the nomination. So much can happen during the general. Someone digs up some really bad dirt on Hillary, then bam President Trump and we all die in WW3. I'd prefer a republican nominee that won't win, but doesn't absolutely terrify me when I think about their potential presidency.
Can trump really substain these leads for 6 months? All of Aug, all of Sept, all of Oct, all of Nov, all of Dec, and finally all of Jan? I highly highly doubt it.
We are all going to look like fools come February when(if) he bombs in the raw vote.
I could see it coming down to Walker or Rand. Maybe Cruz, if he can keep his mouth shut. Bush is way to much of a long shot, Perry is already weak. Carson is gaining steam which I didn't see coming, but I don't see him pulling off a huge upset. The rest will bumble their way through the first debates and drop out, or drop out right after their sub-1% vote tallies in the first few states.
Regardless, Rubio will wind up as the VP pick.
Honestly, I'm enjoying the train wreck as much as the next person, but I get nervous when I think about Trump winning getting the nomination. So much can happen during the general. Someone digs up some really bad dirt on Hillary, then bam President Trump and we all die in WW3. I'd prefer a republican nominee that won't win, but doesn't absolutely terrify me when I think about their potential presidency.
Rand's slogan is too long. defeat the washington machine unleash the american dream
One important difference to keep in mind is that Trump is, to a large extend, self funding his campaign. Despite the Politico article this week concerning his available cash, I don't see him flaming out to the degree that the 2012 front runners did when they made their verbal/campaign gaffes.
I think Trump will be more resilient than most people think (although I certainly don't think he will win the nomination).
I'm sorry, but you can't be a second-generation member of Congress and run your campaign against "the Washington machine."
Randy is so full of shit.
Bloomberg said:This presidents foreign policy is the most feckless in American history," Huckabee said. "It is so naive that he would trust the Iranians. By doing so, he will take the Israelis and march them to the door of the oven."
Romney's only saving grace in 2012 was money. He could barely beat Rick Santorum.Sorry guys but I can't see Trump surviving that long to make it to all 6 debates before the primary. He has to flame out at some point. Money can only get him so far.
Jesus, his own campaign put this out?His social media team even whipped up a graphic for it today:
Subtle.
OhHis social media team even whipped up a graphic for it today:
Subtle.
Romney's only saving grace in 2012 was money. He could barely beat Rick Santorum.
Jesus, his own campaign put this out?
I think Trump's liberal positions will be more than compensated for his unbridled hatred of immigrants.Once they get to know about Trump's liberal positions he will fall. Bush and Walker will see to it they do.
I will say this though: If he makes it to all six debates, gets 2nd place in IA, & gets in either 1st or 2nd in NH, I will donate to his campaign.
His social media team even whipped up a graphic for it today:
Subtle.
Huckabee: "Over here, over here! Look at me! I can say wildly crass and hyperbolic statements, too!"
His social media team even whipped up a graphic for it today:
Subtle.
So I have found it to be a good rule of thumb that anyone who identifies as a philosemite is to be treated with the same amused contempt as anyone who says they love “the African people”.
This stems from when she first found out as a youngster about the Holocaust, which was, like, totally tragic and amazing and terrible, yeah? Cue a lifetime of loving Jews by reducing them to insulting stereotypes. Jews, according to Burchill, are fascinatingly exotic. She gets crushes on the men and she loves all the adorable Jewish people in Israel, who are all chosen and stoical and wise – like people in storybooks, really! Jews are also, according to Burchill, the diametric opposite of Muslim people, who are all horrible, and their oppression of women is much worse than the oppressive codes for orthodox Jewish women, because Jews are good and Muslim people are bad. Burchill, for the record, is 55 years old.
Burchill divides up the chosen people into Good Jews (hardliners, Israelites) and Bad Jews (liberal Jews) with the enthusiasm of an antisemite. Hilariously, she sets herself up as the Jewishness Police, railing against Jews who are not Jewish enough;
The Trump campaign should start a rumor that the secret "S" in Huckabee's logo stands for SATAN SATAN SATAN
Anybody else going to the Bernie Sanders rally in New Orleans tonight?
The biggest advantage Clinton has wrt to her poor favorables is that the entire GOP field also has poor favorable numbers. It's why I'm not too concerned about the "perceived dishonesty" or what have you.
The biggest advantage Clinton has wrt to her poor favorables is that the entire GOP field also has poor favorable numbers. It's why I'm not too concerned about the "perceived dishonesty" or what have you.
Yeah, I edited my post a bit, but a lot of the Republican candidates are also relatively unknown to the general populace, and favorability might only get you so far. Same with Bernie Sanders. His "don't know" numbers are in the 40%, like many smaller candidates, so it's hard to really gauge how he would do with better numbers.
But fuck favorability, let's go to head to head with independents:
Clinton v Bush: -3
Clinton v Trump: +14
Clinton v Walker: +5
Sanders v Bush: +5
Sanders v Trump: +15
Sanders v Walker: +4
So with all this talk about favorability, it doesn't seem to really translate (for independents) on who they'd vote for in a head-to-head. Clinton will probably lose independents nationally, too.
How does Sanders pick up 8 from Bush over Clinton with the same sample group?! That just seems illogical, captain.
I wonder what the numbers would look like without Biden who isn't even running. I expect most of his support would go to Hillary.