I don't think it's so much that "they'll be considered white", racially, as it is that the general effect of whiteness, i.e. relative economic prosperity, freedom from being born into and remaining largely within extreme poverty, freedom from having your rights severely curbed by the legal system, freedom from being discriminated against due to negative stereotyping such that a white man has to be jailed to have as hard of a time finding a decent job as a law-abiding, college-educated member of your race, etc. will naturally extend themselves to segments of the population that are not currently white as more of them become affluent and integrated into the mainstream of American society. Which I think probably will happen for Asians, because while there are certain stereotypes that surround them, they tend to be somewhat positive, at least in terms of getting hired and gaining acceptance (i.e. they work hard, are good at math and science, are conformist and won't rock the boat). And even the negative ones - that they're weird, that they're depressive and anxious, that they're submissive - probably would not be as negative as what black people currently experience, allowing them (the negative stereotypes) to be curbed over time. Basically, what makes racism so pervasive and insidious is that while every new group experiences some negative discrimination when they arrive, they eventually integrate into the mechanisms of white supremacy and find their interests opposed to whoever are still considered "people of color", and while you can probably make a strong case that a common European ancestry is what allowed that to happen for previous groups, the "post-racial, post-Obama" society will likely see such assimilation happen upon more economic lines because of the taboo that now exists on open racism and prejudice. Joey Smith and Jin Park may not have a common ancestry, but if it's equally likely that both were raised in cultures wherein they didn't experience paycheck-to-paycheck poverty, both have decently well-connected families who can help them gain their footing and life, and didn't have run-ins with individual and systemic discrimination from an early age, they might well learn to commiserate about "Dindus" and "thugs" on reddit, together.
Large portions of East Asians are born into poverty that surpasses that of any other racial group; or that they immigrate to the country with wealth and connections far less than that of any native-born American, black or otherwise. The majority of Asians in this country in the future still aren't going to be born here - they're going to continue to be direct immigrants. (assuming current trends hold, which is a dangerous assumption all together, but without that trend holding, the entire demographic change looks dramatically different, and the premise of the question becomes moot) That's the part people don't quite get when they look at the demographic boom.
Part of the reason the poverty is obscured is that they won't break out Japanese, Koreans, and Chinese immigrants from Hmong, Thai, Vietnamese, Cambodian, Indonesian, etc immigrants. That's why you won't have that acclimation - because you're going to have two very distinct groups of Asians in this country. (both economically and culturally) Also; at some point, the US is going to figure out that most of the wealth that was taken from the middle class here ended up creating the modern middle class in India and China, and there's going to be hella resentment. (Alternatively, be Chinese and try to get a security clearance in this country)
EDIT: The general difference I think is confusing different European ethnicities (which would be closer to the differences between states in the US given an extra few centuries or millenia of development) and different asian ethnicities. Add in some historical weirdness of bedfellows (thanks WWI and WWII!), and some groups that historically might not have got along were forced to get along, and that led to a comfort level that WWII actually made worse in East Asia (see Japan, Korea, China, India). I also think the US population was far more likely to integrate when the country had a collective philosophy of being the underdog (compared to Europe) - I don't know if we work that well together when we're on top (see the rapid polarization of the country post Cold War).