• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2017 |OT2| Well, maybe McMaster isn't a traitor.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
Daniel Newhauser
Daniel Newhauser‏ @dnewhauser

Rep Chris Collins says Tuesday Group met last night agreed they won't meet or work w Freedom Caucus. "If that call comes in just hang up"

Yeah, this is fine.
 

Renji_11

Member
Why are congressmen/women even allowed to group themselves into these named factions in the first place? Once you've started going tribal within your own party, and give those tribes labels that you identify with, you're fucked.

Well I guess you have to take the good with the bad. Getting rid of them would also effect the congressional black caucus and I would had to seem them leave.
 

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
Today is one of those "the GOP is crumbling" days.
 

Blader

Member
Well I guess you have to take the good with the bad. Getting rid of them would also effect the congressional black caucus and I would had to seem them leave.

I guess that's true, though I don't usually find this kind of factionalism to be nearly as problematic (and least not publicly) on the Democratic side as it is on the Republican one.

Your post also inspired me to check that there is in fact exactly one Republican in all of the CBC. :lol
 

Apharmd

Member

You know, I hated a Gundam show for having an earth dude that was so racist he'd rather keep shooting space dudes instead of refueling and resupplying his Gundam. He got taken down because he ran out of fuel and ammo and he was okay with it because he was that racist.

I never thought for a moment that would be real.

Here we are.
 
The flood gates opened when Ryan decided that cutting basic health services was a good way to get the HFC onboard.

It's the Catch 22 they're in. Can't win moderates with a far right bill, can't win the far right FC with a moderate bill. And there's no in-between because the FC demands full repeal.

CNBC had a disputed article yesterday that claimed republicans plan on bringing the AHCA (or another bill) up for vote again soon. The same shit is going to happen again, IF that report is accurate.
 

Armaros

Member
I guess that's true, though I don't usually find this kind of factionalism to be nearly as problematic (and least not publicly) on the Democratic side as it is on the Republican one.

Your post also inspired me to check that there is in fact exactly one Republican in all of the CBC. :lol

The issue isn't that caucuses exist, it's that the HFC doesn't want to make or take concessions, they want all bills tailor only for them and screw what the party thinks.
 

sc0la

Unconfirmed Member
Why are congressmen/women even allowed to group themselves into these named factions in the first place? Once you've started going tribal within your own party, and give those tribes labels that you identify with, you're fucked.
You mean political parties? :p

If parties are allowed why wouldn't a caucus within a party?
 

jmdajr

Member
Healthcare is not something the GOP ever cared about. At all. But now they are stuck with it. They can't fix something they wished never existed.
 

DonShula

Member
Nothing the GOP has done over the last 3 months has been strategically feasible. They're falling apart despite having complete unchecked power.

I feel like the one thing that will really keep them together is abortion, which is for most of them a religious issue. Until the Evangelical voting block can be fractured, they are the de facto Republican Party regardless of infighting.
 
Why are congressmen/women even allowed to group themselves into these named factions in the first place? Once you've started going tribal within your own party, and give those tribes labels that you identify with, you're fucked.
There's more representatives in the House than in the Senate so individual votes matter less. Joining with similarly minded representatives lets you form a bloc to collectively bargain with.
 

Zereta

Member
Remember all those articles about how the GOP is doomed post-2016 election? And how everyone said the media got it wrong after Trump won and that it was the Democrats who were in disarray?

Not saying that the left isn't in disarray but man, seems like the GOP's problems never went away, it's inbuilt.

Also: I only began following American politics closely in 2016 and now. But isn't the House Freedom Caucus the result of the Tea Party wave that 1) saved the Republican party and 2) Trump rode to the White House?

And now he's attacking the HFC in support of establishment Republicans?

This political comedy is going to be amazing.
 

DonShula

Member
Also: I only began following American politics closely in 2016 and now. But isn't the House Freedom Caucus the result of the Tea Party wave that 1) saved the Republican party and 2) Trump rode to the White House?

And now he's attacking the HFC in support of establishment Republicans?

This political comedy is going to be amazing.

You are not mistaken.
 
Why are congressmen/women even allowed to group themselves into these named factions in the first place? Once you've started going tribal within your own party, and give those tribes labels that you identify with, you're fucked.

Should the Congressional Black Caucus not be allowed? What about the Congressional Hispanic Caucus? Congressional Progressive Caucus?
 

Zereta

Member
Should the Congressional Black Caucus not be allowed? What about the Congressional Hispanic Caucus? Congressional Progressive Caucus?

While my understanding of American politics is growing, it is still limited but yes: any groupings and classifications like that almost seems counterproductive to a formation of a more cohesive government. You shouldn't need these groups and having those groups only perpetuates those divisions.
 

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
It's the Catch 22 they're in. Can't win moderates with a far right bill, can't win the far right FC with a moderate bill. And there's no in-between because the FC demands full repeal.

CNBC had a disputed article yesterday that claimed republicans plan on bringing the AHCA (or another bill) up for vote again soon. The same shit is going to happen again, IF that report is accurate.

Ryan (as always) botched it from the very beginning.
 

Hindl

Member
Are we witnessing the birth of a third party in America?

A split conservative party and one liberal party would change the entire landscape of our country's politics.

This wouldn't last long, and it's assuming that the liberal party would stay unified, which we've seen can be extremely hard. If we see a full split between the Republicans and the Tea Party, I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of the left split off from the Democrats
 

Blader

Member
Should the Congressional Black Caucus not be allowed? What about the Congressional Hispanic Caucus? Congressional Progressive Caucus?

I guess that's true, though I don't usually find this kind of factionalism to be nearly as problematic (and least not publicly) on the Democratic side as it is on the Republican one.

Your post also inspired me to check that there is in fact exactly one Republican in all of the CBC. :lol

.
 

Armaros

Member
While my understanding of American politics is growing, it is still limited but yes: any groupings and classifications like that almost seems counterproductive to a formation of a more cohesive government. You shouldn't need these groups and having those groups only perpetuates those divisions.

Considering that many European posters on GAF pride themselves on their government systems with multiple parties and power blocs and routinely criticize the US for the two party system...
 
Doesn't it repeal the law and preempt future local laws on the topic?

Not even close.

It technically repeals HB2, in that it says it repeals HB2 specifically, but then reimplements most of HB2 in the form of restrictions saying cities and other institutions aren't allowed to do anything.

Under HB2
- You have to go to the bathroom matching the gender that's on your birth certificate
- No state level anti-discrimination protection for LGBT persons
- Cities cannot create protections stronger than what the state provides

Under this repealed HB2
- Cities cannot grant bathroom access (hello HB2 bullet one)
- No new state level anti-discrimination protection (hello HB2 bullet two)
- Cities cannot create protections stronger than what the state provides until the end of 2020 (hello HB2 bullet three)

This repeal is just HB2 by a different name.
 
Why are congressmen/women even allowed to group themselves into these named factions in the first place? Once you've started going tribal within your own party, and give those tribes labels that you identify with, you're fucked.

Why? Factions can create leverage, especially when you're dealing with a weak Speaker like Ryan. A strong caucus can create deals and directly influence legislation. The problem with the Freedom Caucus is that they don't believe government has a role in anything except...women's bodies I guess. How do you negotiate with people who live in an entirely different reality than the majority of the party? The Freedom Caucus isn't an argument against factions/caucuses, it's moreso an argument against ideological extremists who come to Washington specifically to NOT do their job.
 

Zereta

Member
Considering that many European posters on GAF pride themselves on their government systems with multiple parties and power blocs and routinely criticize the US for the two party system...

I would disagree with those European posters. You can't just apply a political system from one country into another.

Just seems to me that the last thing America's political system needs is further ways to split people up.

(I come from Singapore. Our "multi-party" political system is a joke)
 

Armaros

Member
Why? Factions can create leverage, especially when you're dealing with a weak Speaker like Ryan. A strong caucus can create deals and directly influence legislation. The problem with the Freedom Caucus is that they don't believe government has a role in anything except...women's bodies I guess. How do you negotiate with people who live in an entirely different reality than the majority of the party? The Freedom Caucus isn't an argument against factions/caucuses, it's moreso an argument against ideological extremists who come to Washington specifically to NOT do their job.

The freedom caucus doesn't want concessions, they want unliateral control over writing the legislation and the other members of their party be-damned.

You notice they specially avoid talking about their moderate counterparts that they pushed out of the bill.
 
Ryan: Trump was 'very apologetic' for promoting Fox show that called on me to resign

“He actually was very apologetic,” Ryan said on "CBS This Morning" about Trump's endorsement of the program, during which Pirro also said Trump was not to blame for the American Health Care Act's failure. “He said, 'I had no idea she was going to talk about that. I thought she was going to talk about something else.'”

“So, really, it was completely coincidental,” he said, adding that Trump told him that he expected Pirro would deliver a monologue about Russia.
 

Armaros

Member
I would disagree with those European posters. You can't just apply a political system from one country into another.

Just seems to me that the last thing America's political system needs is further ways to split people up.

(I come from Singapore. Our "multi-party" political system is a joke)

So you are just arguing against human nature. As if politicans should just vote lockstep with their party. Which is dumb especially so for how different various voting districts are and what people want from government.
 

giphy.gif
 
The hearing is pretty interesting. Didn't know that the Russians were involved with many events from the past in America to promote panic. They also used left movements to their own ends like Occupy Wall Street and Black Lives Matters. Also supposedly a lot of the conspiracy sites and some right-wing sites are in Eastern Europe and might be funded through schemes. Also Clinton Watts said to follow the money trail of dead Russians to find out their connections and see if they used financial leverage .
 

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
Robert Costa
Robert Costa‏ @costareports
"There’s nothing as clarifying as the smell of AF1 jet fuel” says a WH official, when asked if Trump may support HFC primary challenges

Again, this is fine.
 
The whole point of caucuses is to find like minded people and band together to get political concessions. Concessions that then can be used to run for reeelction.

The HFC is just unique as the most conservative group that basically never takes any concessions for votrs. They want to write the legislation or they it's a no vote.

Are we witnessing the birth of a third party in America?

A split conservative party and one liberal party would change the entire landscape of our country's politics.

This is why I've never cared about 3rd parties in the US because we basically have them anyway! What the UK calls a coalition, we call a party, and what they call a party, we call a caucus. They're isomorphic.

The HFC is just doing what any 3rd party would do if they held the votes to destroy or preserve the coalition government.


Ryan is without a doubt the most pathetic politician I can think of in my lifetime. Not the most evil (Hastert being a pedo is probably the most evil) but the most spineless, craven, fuckboi to ever hold office.
 

Suikoguy

I whinny my fervor lowly, for his length is not as great as those of the Hylian war stallions
This is why I've never cared about 3rd parties in the US because we basically have them anyway! What the UK calls a coalition, we call a party, and what they call a party, we call a caucus. They're isomorphic.

The HFC is just doing what any 3rd party would do if they held the votes to destroy or preserve the coalition government.

I've been arguing this for what seems like ages.
 
Russians could finance a candidate that is likely to win to undermine them because of money in politics. Seems like something they would do.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom