Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who has more power over how American law is enforced than any other single living human being, is concerned about New York City.
The nations largest population center continues to see gang murder after gang murder, Sessions office said in a statement Friday, attributing the putative murderpocalypse to the citys commitment to humane treatment of undocumented immigrants:
Eight and a half million people live in New York City. New York City had 335 murders in 2016. That is down from 352 in 2015. It is the second-lowest murder rate in New York City history, tied with 2013 and just behind 2014s all-time low of 333.
Shootings, too, are down  below 1,000 last year for the first time on record.
Of course they are, she's a woman.The alt-left is attacking Warren now. Gotta get that "not Bernie" litmus test going
I don't think is will play well in France tbh.
Alex Moe (@AlexNBCNews)
Trump on a healthcare vote next week: "It doesn't matter if it's next week. Next week doesn't matter."
The alt-left is attacking Warren now. Gotta get that "not Bernie" litmus test going
Senility is becoming an epidemic.
You know exactly why Jeff Sessions thinks "inner cities" are dangerous.I never understood these guys who think NYC is so dangerous, the city's safer than it's ever been.
I never understood these guys who think NYC is so dangerous, the city's safer than it's ever been.
You know exactly why Jeff Sessions thinks "inner cities" are dangerous.
The people that they're trying to convince with these comments have never been to NYC and assume it's a crime-ridden hellscape just like in the early 90s
The alt-left is attacking Warren now. Gotta get that "not Bernie" litmus test going
Senility is becoming an epidemic.
No talk in here about how Mulvaney wants democrats to pay for the wall in an equal exchange for Obamacare funds?
Why in the world would democrats ever agree to this?
No talk in here about how Mulvaney wants democrats to pay for the wall in an equal exchange for Obamacare funds?
Why in the world would democrats ever agree to this?
I never understood these guys who think NYC is so dangerous, the city's safer than it's ever been.
The Democrats have nothing to lose by just saying no to everything
Right. Playing that exact game won the republicans control of the entire government. No reason for democrats to play nice.
Support for weed legalization is at a point where the numbers say "holy crap just get on board". It'll make young while male voters happy for a while, at leastThe current GOP is stuck in a timewarp with many of their policies, including re-emphasis in the war on drugs and this new emphasis on the war on gangs. Only Chicago has a big problem right now.
The alt-left is attacking Warren now. Gotta get that "not Bernie" litmus test going
Senility is becoming an epidemic.
No talk in here about how Mulvaney wants democrats to pay for the wall in an equal exchange for Obamacare funds?
Why in the world would democrats ever agree to this?
Support for weed legalization is at a point where the numbers say "holy crap just get on board". It'll make young while male voters happy for a while, at least
Wait there is another healthcare bill now? Does anyone know whats in it (no, im sure)?
I believe the correct slur is ctrl-left
Right. Playing that exact game won the republicans control of the entire government. No reason for democrats to play nice.
Wait there is another healthcare bill now? Does anyone know whats in it (no, im sure)?
Sessions does not understand what kind is actually going on in the country. He probably gets his information from Fox News.
We have a crime problem, he said. I wish the blip I wish the rise that were seeing in crime in America today were some sort of aberration or a blip. My best judgment, having been involved in criminal law enforcement for many years, is that this is a dangerous permanent trend that places the health and safety of the American people at risk.
The homicide rate in 2015 was lower than when Barack Obama took office as president and lower than the 45 years preceding that.
A permanent trend of increasing homicides would mean that everyone in the United States would eventually be killed.
Sessions has spouted this bullshit before:
Sessionss first comments as attorney general inflated U.S. crime problem
A permanent trend of increasing homicides would mean that everyone in the United States would eventually be killed.
Sessions has spouted this bullshit before:
Sessionss first comments as attorney general inflated U.S. crime problem
permanent trend of increasing homicides would mean that everyone in the United States would eventually be killed.
The alt-left is attacking Warren now. Gotta get that "not Bernie" litmus test going
Senility is becoming an epidemic.
I believe the correct slur is ctrl-left
We need to be honest about what is happening. These aren't one-offs or misstatements.
Bernie Sanders has a 50-state strategy that clearly, explicitly depends on bringing in anti-abortion candidates. He is vying for control of the party and coming close to getting it. It started with statements to the press, and has included endorsements of Heath Mello and Tom Perriello (Perriello has now said he regrets voting for Stupak, one of the worst abortion restrictions before Congress in the last several years, but he has a whole bunch of contradicting statements as to why he did it and what he has "always" believed and, as I've covered, has utterly failed to make himself believable yet).
Tom Perez, the chair of the DNC, is accepting it.
When called on it, they peddle a fantasy that anti-abortion people can uphold Roe. What they fail to acknowledge is that direct challenges to Roe are not what state legislatures consider. An incremental strategy to restricting abortion is how we have hundreds of new restrictions at the state level over the past several years.
What they are selling is new abortion restrictions -- 20-week bans, funding bans, selection bans, procedure bans. What they are selling is Mike Pence not having to bother to come in to cast a tie-breaking vote.
The big question that we need to ask ourselves is:
WHO IS BUILDING A 50-STATE STRATEGY THAT INCLUDES ABORTION RIGHTS?
If there is a quick answer, please provide. Otherwise, we need to get our shit together right now or women will pay for generations to come. The callousness of doing this after Justice Gorsuch took his spot on the bench could knock the wind out of a gal. This is literally the absolute worst time for Democrats to cave on abortion.
We need to think big. We need to build a 50-state strategy. Democrats, as well as Independents who want control the Democrats, have. We should work to force them to do better. But we also must create our own strategy. If we don't, we're toast.
An worthwhile take on Sanders and the dangers of propping up anti-abortion democrats as part of the 50 State strategy (specifically as it pertains to state governments rather than federal) from fromer Action Vice President for the National Organization for Women (NOW) Erin Matson:
https://www.facebook.com/erinmatson/posts/10211473644850699
An worthwhile take on Sanders and the dangers of propping up anti-abortion democrats as part of the 50 State strategy (specifically as it pertains to state governments rather than federal) from fromer Action Vice President for the National Organization for Women (NOW) Erin Matson:
https://www.facebook.com/erinmatson/posts/10211473644850699
I can't imagine a comprehensive 50-state strategy that doesn't include anti-abortion and anti-gun control candidates.
We literally spent the past 2 pages talking about how its the juxtaposition of this with the Ossoff comments that was the problem. Read. Then post.This is not a problem that's suddenly unique to Sanders, though? I've read time and time again that we need to accept folks like Joe Manchin but now Bernie is campaigning with a pro-lifer and it's dangerous?
I can't imagine a comprehensive 50-state strategy that doesn't include anti-abortion and anti-gun control candidates.
It won't.
People need to deal with it unless they're cool with the alternative of these seats never budging for Democrats and the country stay gridlocked without progress.
We literally spent the past 2 pages talking about how its the juxtaposition of this with the Ossoff comments that was the problem. Read. Then post.
Sorry, phone cut off the giant wall of text so context was missing.I was responding to a post they linked about using anti-abortion democrats as part of a 50 state strategy, so maybe you should read and then post?
Sarah Ferris (@sarahnferris)
Mulvaney says White House has offered Dems $1 in Obamacare funds for $1 in wall funds in Bloomberg Live interview
Basically. I'm not overly concerned with the positions of one candidate, so much as the patterns occurring at national strategic levels.
This is not a problem that's suddenly unique to Sanders, though? I've read time and time again that we need to accept folks like Joe Manchin but now Bernie is campaigning with a pro-lifer and it's dangerous?
Matt House‏ @mattwhouse 2h2 hours ago
The US government is supposed to take care of its citizens
POTUS said Mexico is supposed to pay for the wall.
This is a non starter.
"WHAT THE FUCK IS GOVERNING"
Schumer's communication director's response:
Even Mitch is probably like smh
AKA "What are you, stupid?"
Even Mitch is probably like smh