• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF Thread of PRESIDENT OBAMA Checkin' Off His List

Status
Not open for further replies.
GhaleonEB said:
FOXNation-Guns-Obama_2fd61.jpg

FOXNation-guns-Holder_10719.jpg


Subtle.
oh ffs
 
Jason's Ultimatum said:
What are the chances of Mousavi winning? Zero, considering the Ayatollahs are really in power?
No, he could certainly win. If elected, his power would be strongly limited by the Ayatollahs . . . but he certainly can win and have a good effect.
 

thefro

Member
Jason's Ultimatum said:
What are the chances of Mousavi winning? Zero, considering the Ayatollahs are really in power?

All the people running are approved by the Ayatollahs' "Guardian Council"
 
Israelis honor Obama with more illegal settlements- "Obama Hut"

Bethlehem - Ma'an/Agencies - Israeli settlers established a new illegal West Bank outpost on Thursday, dedicating it partly to US President Barack Obama.

The settlers, calling themselves the "Land of Israel Loyalists," named the outpost Oz Yehonatan, near Binyamin, but were calling part of it the "Obama Hut," according to the Israeli news agency Ynet.

And according to a report from Israel's Arutz Sheva news agency, the outpost was named "in recognition of the president’s actions, which have led to a dramatic increase in the number of outposts being built throughout Judea and Samaria ."

Meanwhile on Thursday, Obama firmly rejected Israeli settlements built on seized Palestinian land in the West Bank. "The United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements." "This construction violates previous agreements and undermines efforts to achieve peace. It is time for these settlements to stop."

http://www.maannews.net/en/index.php?opr=ShowDetails&Do=&ID=38330

New outpost established in West Bank


The "Land of Israel Loyalists" movement established a new West Bank outpost, called Oz Yehonatan, in the Binyamin region.


The outpost includes a wooden structure dubbed "Obama Hut." The youngsters who built the outpost said it is a "gesture of appreciation" for the US president, whose actions prompted a dramatic rise in the number of outposts.

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3726726,00.html

How childish.

Are these adults?
 

Jonm1010

Banned
Deus Ex Machina said:
Israelis honor Obama with more illegal settlements- "Obama Hut"



How childish.

Are these adults?
Pass a law, if Israel wishes to keep receiving aid from America they must seize the expansion of settlements. I know its far to idealistic and unrealistic to expect that, but this sort of shit is a real slap in the face.
 

Arde5643

Member
Edit: Bah, I hate getting my emotions not under control.

Hopefully the Obama admin will do something about this. The right wing of Israel is basically acting like Rush and other annoying scalywags of the Republican party in US.

Like fucking spoiled kids.
 
Deus Ex Machina said:
Israelis honor Obama with more illegal settlements- "Obama Hut"



How childish.

Are these adults?
Cut off all aid to Israel, use that spending to help Palestine and neighboring countries as a show of good will to the Muslim world.
 

APF

Member
reilo said:
You just argued that networks should be free to put on whoever they want to speak freely. Why shouldn't people be allowed to speak out against that network for putting that person on?
... when did I say people shouldn't be allowed to speak out?


PantherLotus: look her up on Wikipedia, then come back to me.
 

Shirokun

Member
Jonm1010 said:
Pass a law, if Israel wishes to keep receiving aid from America they must seize the expansion of settlements. I know its far to idealistic and unrealistic to expect that, but this sort of shit is a real slap in the face.

AIPAC and the senate will have something to say about this, sadly.
 

Sharp

Member
SimpleDesign said:
Cut off all aid to Israel, use that spending to help Palestine and neighboring countries as a show of good will to the Muslim world.
You do realize that a significant portion of the aid Palestine receives goes directly towards straight-up terrorism, right? Israel is hardly blameless but sometimes when I read this thread I suspect that a lot of GAF either has forgotten or doesn't seriously believe that Israel is more or less constantly being attacked by the Palestinians as well--not just their new settlements, either.
 
mckmas8808 said:
So can they deny the true winner and do a re-vote?
No, they are just not allowed to run at all. You have to be approved as a candidate before you run. But if they were to deny the winner a seat, they'd be asking for trouble.
 
John Zaubler Charged With Threatening To Kill Sotomayor

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/05/john-zaubler-charged-with_n_211989.html

NEW YORK — A Manhattan man who threatened to kill U.S. Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor and said he wanted to kill President Barack Obama has been arraigned on charges of making a terroristic threat.

A criminal complaint says 48-year-old John Zaubler called 911 Saturday and said he was going to kill Sotomayor by "blowing her up" because he did not want his girlfriend to go to federal prison.

The complaint also says he wanted to kill Obama by "blowing him up."

Zaubler did not enter a plea in Manhattan Criminal Court.

Judge James Gibbons ordered Zaubler held without bail and ordered a psychiatric examination. He scheduled a hearing for July 6.

Zaubler's lawyer, Fran Hoffinger, did not immediately return a call seeking comment.
After reading the article I think the guy is a nut..
 
Wounded Troops react to Obama's visit

Obama visits wounded troops at Landstuhl

http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=63126

RAMSTEIN AIR BASE, Germany — Air Force One carrying President Barack Obama on a whirlwind trip to the Middle East and Europe touched down at this base in the picturesque German countryside at 5:45 p.m. local time.

A crowd of onlookers gathered on an embankment behind a sea of news vans to get a glimpse of the president and Air Force One hours before it landed.

“I think it’s exciting,” said Maria Ortiz, one of the onlookers.

Ortiz said she came all the way from San Antonio, Texas, with her husband, Ernest Ortiz, an Air Force retiree, to see Obama. They planned to continue their European trip in London.

“It’s interesting,” said Army Spc. Dustin Graeber, who serves with the 5th Battalion, 7th Air Defense Artillery in Kaiserslautern.

Obama met with about 100 injured servicemembers during a two-hour stop at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center on Friday evening, where he visited with patients in their beds in the Intensive Care Unit and another hospital ward, as well as with a standing crowd at the USO Warrior Center.

He presented about a half a dozen Purple Hearts, base officials said, and shook hands with everyone, said seven servicemembers who sat down to interviews with the media after the president’s visit. The group said they were nervous, emotional and excited to meet the president.

“It actually brought a tear to my eye,” said Army Sgt. Matt Berth, 26, a member of the Wisconsin Army National Guard who was recently injured in Afghanistan.

Unable to walk without crutches due to balance issues, Berth made a point of standing with assistance from Cpl. Steven Baker while Obama pinned a Purple Heart on his uniform.

“He’s my commander-in-chief and I did want to give him respect,” he said.

Baker, 24, of the 10th Mountain Division at Fort Drum, N.Y., also received a Purple Heart from Obama.

“At first I thought they were kidding when they said the president was coming,” he said. When the president did show up, “I was nervous, bad,” he said. “I really couldn’t stop smiling.”

Receiving a Purple Heart from Obama is “a moment I’ll never forget,” he said.

Servicemembers said Obama seemed down-to-earth, friendly and approachable. “More like a normal guy,” said one.

“He made it seem like it was his honor to see us, a pretty cool feeling that you’re kind of the honor for the most important person in the U.S,” said Pfc. Dean Baker of the 161st Infantry Brigade.

What stood out for Baker was that Obama seemed to genuinely care for the servicemembers. “He was saying he prays for us before he goes to sleep at night and that we’re the first people he thinks about when he wakes up.”

First Lt. Danielle Schaaf, a nurse at Landstuhl, accompanied Obama into her ward, but said the president really didn’t need an escort. “He went right into the room, ‘Hey guys what’s up?’ He’s very friendly and personable.”

Servicemembers said they got wind of the presidential visit a few days ago, but many didn’t have time to tell their families back home about it.

Schaaf said the spouse of one of her patients called while Obama was in the room. He passed the phone to the president. “Yeah, this is Barack, and your husband’s doing great here,’” he told her. “I think she was pretty surprised.”

Bacon, like the troops at Landstuhl, said meeting the president was a first for him, and it was something he had looked forward to. The whole visit took about a week or a week and a half to prepare for, he added.

“The most important thing is to have him see the wounded warriors,” Bacon said before the president arrived.

Bacon described meeting the nation’s 44th president as intimidating at first, but he said the president’s cordial demeanor quickly put him at ease.

The president noticed the crowd eagerly anticipating his arrival and said he appreciates everything servicemembers do for the country, Bacon said.

610x.jpg


610x.jpg
 
Sharp said:
You do realize that a significant portion of the aid Palestine receives goes directly towards straight-up terrorism, right? Israel is hardly blameless but sometimes when I read this thread I suspect that a lot of GAF either has forgotten or doesn't seriously believe that Israel is more or less constantly being attacked by the Palestinians as well--not just their new settlements, either.
It's a circle of hate, I know this. But how else do you expect to stop terrorism? 8 years we've been at this and we've only made things worse by making threats and showing force.
 
PHOTOS The Obamas arrive in Caen (June 6)

610x.jpg

US first lady Michelle Obama, centre, seen during an arrival ceremony with French first lady Carla Bruni-Sarkozy, at the Prefecture, in Caen, France

610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg
 

Yixian

Banned
See Sarko and Obama are actually a lot closer in ideology than Bush and Sarko were. In fact, Sarko might be right wing by french standards but he wouldn't dare privatise half the things Obama is happy to leave to the hands of the market.

Anyway as for this speech Obama made to the muslim world, I have two thoughts. First of all, if there is one thing we have learnt from the decades the palestine-israeli conflict has been going on it's that words mean absolutely nothing to the outcome there. If the US really wants to make steps towards resolving the situation it needs to start forcing both sides to make changes with every sanction it can muster from it's own international importance.

Secondly it's that I get the impression many western muslims feel like the tension between western civilisation and the muslim world is basically the only thing holding it back, but actually, with the exception of sub-saharran Africa (thanks to a couple hundred miles of desert seperating them), the muslim world has "great divides" and tension with every single civilisation it borders on; Pakistan-India, Muslims in China, Indonesia & Malaysia, Chechnya.

This is mostly true of other parts of the world when they were similarly unable to separate their religion from their cultural identity, but it's the only part of the world now that suffers from this so universally and it's frankly embarrassing. When life and culture = religion and your neighbors just aren't interesting in converting you're putting up walls that just don't need to be there, and actually, with the exception of attitudes towards women, there's not much substance to them anyway, if they stopped insisting that there was so much difference between them and non/other believers then they'd find getting on with the outside world a whole lot easier.
 

GhaleonEB

Member
I don't read much Robert Reich, but he's making me nervous here.

I'ved poked around Washington today, talking with friends on the Hill who confirm the worst: Big Pharma and Big Insurance are gaining ground in their campaign to kill the public option in the emerging health care bill.

You know why, of course. They don't want a public option that would compete with private insurers and use its bargaining power to negotiate better rates with drug companies. They argue that would be unfair. Unfair? Unfair to give more people better health care at lower cost? To Pharma and Insurance, "unfair" is anything that undermines their profits.

So they're pulling out all the stops -- pushing Democrats and a handful of so-called "moderate" Republicans who say they're in favor of a public option to support legislation that would include it in name only. One of their proposals is to break up the public option into small pieces under multiple regional third-party administrators that would have little or no bargaining leverage. A second is to give the public option to the states where Big Pharma and Big Insurance can easily buy off legislators and officials, as they've been doing for years. A third is bind the public plan to the same rules private insurers have already wangled, thereby making it impossible for the public plan to put competitive pressure on the insurers.

Max Baucus, Chair of Senate Finance (now exactly why does the Senate Finance Committee have so much say over health care?) hasn't shown his cards but staffers tell me he's more than happy to sign on to any one of these. But Baucus is waiting for more support from his colleagues, and none of the three proposals has emerged as the leading candidate for those who want to kill the public option without showing they're killing it. Meanwhile, Ted Kennedy and his staff are still pushing for a full public option, but with Kennedy ailing, he might not be able to round up the votes. (Kennedy's health committee released a draft of a bill today, which contains the full public option.)

Enter Olympia Snowe. Her move is important, not because she's Republican (the Senate needs only 51 votes to pass this) but because she's well-respected and considered non-partisan, and therefore offers some cover to Democrats who may need it. Last night Snowe hosted a private meeting between members and staffers about a new proposal Pharma and Insurance are floating, and apparently she's already gained the tentative support of several Democrats (including Ron Wyden and Thomas Carper). Under Snowe's proposal, the public option would kick in years from now, but it would be triggered only if insurance companies fail to bring down healthcare costs and expand coverage in he meantime.

What's the catch? First, these conditions are likely to be achieved by other pieces of the emerging legislation; for example, computerized records will bring down costs a tad, and a mandate requiring everyone to have coverage will automatically expand coverage. If it ever comes to it, Pharma and Insurance can argue that their mere participation fulfills their part of the bargain, so no public option will need to be triggered. Second, as Pharma and Insurance well know, "years from now" in legislative terms means never. There will never be a better time than now to enact a public option. If it's not included, in a few years the public's attention will be elsewhere.

Much the same dynamic is occurring in the House. Two members who had originally supported single payer told me that Pharma and Insurance have launched the same strategy there, and many House members are looking to see what happens in the Senate. Snowe's "trigger" is already buzzing among members.

All this will be decided within days or weeks. And once those who want to kill the public option without their fingerprints on the murder weapon begin to agree on a proposal -- Snowe's "trigger" or any other -- the public option will be very hard to revive. The White House must now insist on a genuine public option. And you, dear reader, must insist as well.

This is it, folks. The concrete is being mixed and about to be poured. And after it's poured and hardens, universal health care will be with us for years to come in whatever form it now takes. Let your representative and senators know you want a public option without conditions or triggers -- one that gives the public insurer bargaining leverage over drug companies, and pushes insurers to do what they've promised to do. Don't wait until the concrete hardens and we've lost this battle.​
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.co...ch/2009/06/the-public-option-smokescreens.php
 
PHOTOS Normandy

610x.jpg

Marine One with President Barack Obama and first lady Michelle Obama onboard flies over Pointe du Hoc, a cliff top location on the coast of Normandy west of Omaha Beach

610x.jpg


610x.jpg

Normandy Veteran Fredrick William Norris, who was awarded the Military Medal, touches one of the graves of a friend from his regiment, the 5th Assault Regiment of the Armoured Engineers, who fell after their tank was destroyed on Sword Beach on D-Day

610x.jpg

President Barack Obama greets D-Day veterans Ben Franklin of Knoxville, Tenn and Clyde Combs of Houston

610x.jpg

President Barack Obama hugs World War II D-Day veteran Clyde Combs of Houston, Texas, as he arrives at the Normandy American Cemetery

610x.jpg

President Barack Obama, Prince Charles, British Prime Minster Gordon Brown, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and France's President Nicolas Sarkozy

610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg

Tom Hanks poses with US veteran William F. Edwards

610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg

Prime Minister Gordon Brown walks towards Omaha Beach

610x.jpg


810x.jpg
 
GOP: President Obama snubbed us

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0609/23426.html#ixzz0HfB0mKSV&C

Republican leaders in the House complained on Friday that President Barack Obama is blowing them off after he seemed to ignore their weeks-old request for a meeting to discuss health care reform.

Last month, Republican leaders in the House asked Obama for a meeting on the issue before Congress embarks on its summer adventure, but in his reply sent on Friday night, Obama makes no mention of their request, according to a copy obtained by POLITICO.

"There's too much at stake to get health care reform wrong, and it's disappointing that the Administration is choosing a go-it-alone approach," said Antonia Ferrier, a spokeswoman for Republican Leader John Boehner.

The White House did not immediately respond to a Friday evening request for comment on the letter.

This epistolary duel between the president and GOP leaders on Capitol Hill is a predictable precursor to the nitty-gritty of health care negotiations as the White House scrambles for a bill.

This past week, Obama met with Democrats on two key Senate committees, but not their Republican counterparts. And though his staff is meeting with moderate Republicans in the House, he has not yet met with party leaders to discuss health care reform.

Obama also made sure his budget bill included protections that would allow him to jam health care legislation through the Senate with a simple majority vote, preventing Republicans from waging a filibuster.

Despite the calls for a bipartisan bill, clear partisan divides are already starting to emerge, as Republicans are making the case that Democrats aren't following through on their promises to reach across the aisle. Obama's letter — dated June 2, but not sent until Friday, June 5 — feeds into that narrative.

Could it be that President Obama has tired of their games? Obama held out his hand and they spat in it..

He strikes me as a man who has little patience for their kind of nonsense. Why waste his time? They will all vote against whatever he endorses anyway. The man is not stupid.
 

ronito

Member
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2009/03/experts-on-third-world-banana-republics.html

Who are the leading experts on third world banana republics?

Probably those at the International Monetary Fund with years of experience lending money to corrupt regimes after their excess became so out of hand that they needed emergency assistance.

Today, two top IMF officials said that the U.S. has become a third world banana republic.

First, Simon Johnson, former chief economist of the IMF, says recovery will fail unless we break the financial oligarchy that is blocking essential reform, and calls the U.S. a banana republic. In his essay "The Quiet Coup" (which includes sections like "Becoming a Banana Republic"), Johnson writes:

Typically, these countries are in a desperate economic situation for one simple reason—the powerful elites within them overreached in good times and took too many risks. Emerging-market governments and their private-sector allies commonly form a tight-knit—and, most of the time, genteel—oligarchy, running the country rather like a profit-seeking company in which they are the controlling shareholders. When a country like Indonesia or South Korea or Russia grows, so do the ambitions of its captains of industry. As masters of their mini-universe, these people make some investments that clearly benefit the broader economy, but they also start making bigger and riskier bets. They reckon—correctly, in most cases—that their political connections will allow them to push onto the government any substantial problems that arise. . . .

The downward spiral that follows is remarkably steep. Enormous companies teeter on the brink of default, and the local banks that have lent to them collapse....

Squeezing the oligarchs, though, is seldom the strategy of choice among emerging-market governments. Quite the contrary: at the outset of the crisis, the oligarchs are usually among the first to get extra help from the government, such as preferential access to foreign currency, or maybe a nice tax break, or—here’s a classic Kremlin bailout technique—the assumption of private debt obligations by the government. Under duress, generosity toward old friends takes many innovative forms. Meanwhile, needing to squeeze someone, most emerging-market governments look first to ordinary working folk—at least until the riots grow too large. . . .

In its depth and suddenness, the U.S. economic and financial crisis is shockingly reminiscent of moments we have recently seen in emerging markets (and only in emerging markets): South Korea (1997), Malaysia (1998), Russia and Argentina (time and again). . . .But there’s a deeper and more disturbing similarity: elite business interests—financiers, in the case of the U.S.—played a central role in creating the crisis, making ever-larger gambles, with the implicit backing of the government, until the inevitable collapse. More alarming, they are now using their influence to prevent precisely the sorts of reforms that are needed, and fast, to pull the economy out of its nosedive.The government seems helpless, or unwilling, to act against them.

Second, Desmond Lachman - a long-time official with the IMF and former chief strategist for emerging markets at Salomon Smith Barney - agrees, writing in an essay entitled "Welcome to America, the World's Scariest Emerging Market":

The parallels between U.S. policymaking and what we see in emerging markets are clearest in how we've mishandled the banking crisis. We delude ourselves that our banks face liquidity problems, rather than deeper solvency problems, and we try to fix it all on the cheap just like any run-of-the-mill emerging market economy would try to do. And after years of lecturing Asian and Latin American leaders about the importance of consistency and transparency in sorting out financial crises, we fail on both counts....

In visits to Asian capitals during the region's financial crisis in the late 1990s, I often heard Asian reformers such as Singapore's Lee Kuan Yew or Japan's Eisuke Sakakibara complain about how the incestuous relationship between governments and large Asian corporate conglomerates stymied real economic change. How fortunate, I thought then, that the United States was not similarly plagued by crony capitalism! However, watching Goldman Sachs's seeming lock on high-level U.S. Treasury jobs as well as the way that Republicans and Democrats alike tiptoed around reforming Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae -- among the largest campaign contributors to Congress -- made me wonder if the differences between the United States and the Asian economies were only a matter of degree....

If we insist on ... not facing our real problems, we might soon lose our status as a country to be emulated and join the ranks of those nations we have patronized for so long.

While such statements are generally taboo among officials or bankers in the U.S., even the former Vice President of the Dallas Federal Reserve agrees:

Gerald O'Driscoll, a former vice president at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank, said he worried that the failure of the government to provide more information about its rescue spending could signal corruption.

"Nontransparency in government programs is always associated with corruption in other countries, so I don't see why it wouldn't be here," he said.
OMG, commies in the IMF?!
 
Deus Ex Machina said:
GOP: President Obama snubbed us

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0609/23426.html#ixzz0HfB0mKSV&C



Could it be that President Obama has tired of their games? Obama held out his hand and they spat in it..

He strikes me as a man who has little patience for their kind of nonsense. Why waste his time? They will all vote against whatever he endorses anyway. The man is not stupid.

Seriously, what do they expect after the last debacle? I'm sure Obama will reach out to them, but on his terms - not theirs. I just hope this isn't rushed and is done the right way. As the Reich article says, we'll be stuck with this for awhile. Hopefully the democrats stand firm, and hopefully Obama really uses his popularity/bully pulpit to make this priority #1
 

Chrono

Banned
speculawyer said:
Fuck yeah . . . get rid of Iran's hardline religious fundamentalist belligerent dickhead. We did it here by getting rid of Cheney, you can do it too.

Yeah, like Cheney. Because Iran is a democracy, we've just been duped by Zionist imperialist media into thinking it's not to prepare for war and corporate rape.

Electing Moussavi will be huge for several reasons, and he will have influence, just try not to be stupid.

TheGrayGhost said:
I'm liking the Israelis less and less:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uxt9HwfPwPo

Maybe the Arab world is onto something: modernity isn't such a good thing. Buncha fuckwads.

If there's a competition to draw the dumbest conclusion possible from that video, you win.
 

thefit

Member
Enter Olympia Snowe. Her move is important, not because she's Republican (the Senate needs only 51 votes to pass this) but because she's well-respected and considered non-partisan, and therefore offers some cover to Democrats who may need it. Last night Snowe hosted a private meeting between members and staffers about a new proposal Pharma and Insurance are floating, and apparently she's already gained the tentative support of several Democrats (including Ron Wyden and Thomas Carper). Under Snowe's proposal, the public option would kick in years from now, but it would be triggered only if insurance companies fail to bring down healthcare costs and expand coverage in he meantime.

What's the catch? First, these conditions are likely to be achieved by other pieces of the emerging legislation; for example, computerized records will bring down costs a tad, and a mandate requiring everyone to have coverage will automatically expand coverage. If it ever comes to it, Pharma and Insurance can argue that their mere participation fulfills their part of the bargain, so no public option will need to be triggered. Second, as Pharma and Insurance well know, "years from now" in legislative terms means never. There will never be a better time than now to enact a public option. If it's not included, in a few years the public's attention will be elsewhere.

This is the part that is gaining ground and is the poison pill that proponents of eventual health care for all are afraid off, if that catches on you can say goodbye to any real public option and its back to business as usual. Its so fucking tragic that we allow for big money to guide the hand of legislators rather than them doing the right thing.

If the credit card bill is any indication, with the amount of money hats that got in the way of that, this is going to be epic disappointment.
 

APF

Member
Chrono said:
Yeah, like Cheney. Because Iran is a democracy, we've just been duped by Zionist imperialist media into thinking it's not to prepare for war and corporate rape.
Oh yeah, that reminds me I forgot to make fun of Sy Hersh for his dreams of imminent invasions of Iran never materializing despite repeated, monthly "expose reporting" breathlessly arguing otherwise. That guy is fucking frustrating--more a stenographer to the disgruntled than anything else, but man every couple of decades he blows the roof off.
 
PHOTOS

Israeli peace activists during a demonstration in Tel Aviv on June 6, 2009, marking 42 years since the Six Day War between Israel against Egypt, Jordan and Syria.

610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg
 
A few more images from Normandy.

610x.jpg

Normandy American Cemetery and Memorial in Colleville-sur-Mer

610x.jpg

President Barack Obama salutes World War II veterans Clyde Combs (L) of Houston, Texas, and Ben Franklin (C), of Knoxville, Tennessee

610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg


610x.jpg

First Lady Michelle Obama and France's First Lady Carla Bruni-Sarkozy are greeted by a war veteran


Back at Air Force one! :)

610x.jpg

A boy poses for a photograph on the stairs of the Air Force One at the U.S. airbase in Ramstein June 5, 2009.
 

reilo

learning some important life lessons from magical Negroes
DOO13ER said:
They let him that close to the plane? I'm surprised...
Looks like there is a locked door after you open the plane's flight hatch. That shit is probably a ten inch thick metal barrier I bet.
 
Chrono said:
Yeah, like Cheney. Because Iran is a democracy, we've just been duped by Zionist imperialist media into thinking it's not to prepare for war and corporate rape.

Electing Moussavi will be huge for several reasons, and he will have influence, just try not to be stupid.
WTF is that supposed to mean?
 

APF

Member
Deus Ex Machina said:
Israeli peace activists during a demonstration in Tel Aviv on June 6, 2009, marking 42 years since the Six Day War between Israel against Egypt, Jordan and Syria.
WTF? But you guys told me Israelis are evil bastards who should get fucked. NeoGAF fails once again :(
 

reilo

learning some important life lessons from magical Negroes
Instigator said:
This is not even putting some effort into it.

APF on weekdays is more abrasive and clever.
Yeah, seriously. APF, you gotta lay out a better trap than that. JayDubya brings his A game on the weekends (see Harvard study on bankruptcy and health insurance thread). Are you going to let JD outwit you?
 
U.S. high court asked to block Chrysler sale

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090607/ap_on_go_su_co/us_supreme_court_chrysler_bankruptcy

NEW YORK - Opponents of Chrysler's sale to Fiat are asking the Supreme Court to block the deal.

Three Indiana state pension and construction funds filed emergency papers at the high court early Sunday to put the sale on hold so they can pursue an appeal.

The federal appeals court in New York approved the sale Friday, but gave objectors until Monday afternoon to try to get the Supreme Court to intervene. Chrysler wants to sell the bulk of its assets to a group led by Italy's Fiat as part of its plan to emerge from bankruptcy protection.

The emergency request goes first to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who handles such matters from New York. She can act on her own or refer it to the entire court.

I say we wash our hands of it.

Cut off the funds completely, let a bankruptcy court liquidate it, and take whatever we're entitled to (probably nothing, since we so wisely chose to convert our holdings to common stock).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom