ViperVisor said:8 weeks of additional lolly-gagging and we get 1 irrelevant vote from Olympia "My vote today is my vote today. It doesn't forecast what my vote will be tomorrow." Snowe.
They should have compromised. Compromised! COMPROMISED!!
ViperVisor said:8 weeks of additional lolly-gagging and we get 1 irrelevant vote from Olympia "My vote today is my vote today. It doesn't forecast what my vote will be tomorrow." Snowe.
Its interesting how even as our popular culture has become raunchier, our official political culture has in a lot of ways become more prudish. Consider the case of Grover Cleveland:
Maria claimed that [New York Governor and Presidential candidate Grover] Cleveland was the father, although there was no way to prove it one way or another. However, Cleveland was a bachelor while the other paternity candidates were married. When the child was born in September 1874 she named him Oscar Folsom Cleveland. (Oscar Folsom was Clevelands law partner.)
Despite uncertainty Cleveland decided to accept paternity. He had less to lose than other possibilities. He acknowledged the boy and provided for his support. When one of his campaign leaders tried to publicly blame the deceased Oscar Folsom as the father, Cleveland had the story squelched.
Not long after the birth Maria began drinking heavily, and Cleveland had a judge commit her to an insane asylum and the child to an orphanage. He paid the orphanage expenses of $5 per week. When Maria was released, Cleveland had her set up in a business in Niagara Falls. Later she tried unsuccessfully to get custody of her son, and he was placed for adoption with a family. Cleveland paid her $500 and she left town. The son grew up to become a medical doctor.
The Republicans used the campaign slogan, Ma Ma, Wheres my Pa? The controversy about public service and private morality raged across the nation. The choice was between a man of personal immorality and public service integrity (Grover Cleveland) and one of a model family man guilty of using public office for personal gain (James G. Blaine). Cleveland narrowly won. After his election the Democrats answered the Republican ditty with Gone to the White House, ha ha ha!
This campaign also featured Blaines supporters accusing the Democrats of being the party of rum, romanism, and rebellionanother memorable slogan. The presidential elections of this period were noteworthy for being extremely close and simultaneously lacking in clear ideological content. Hence a premium was put on coming up with fun slogans.
cntrational said:now for something else entirely
New Orleans cops use ancient "unnatural copulation" law to turn prostitutes into sex-offenders
From the hands of the big business, big spending party, into the hands of the big business, big spending party. Choice is great, isn't it?HocusPocus said:What a great day! A republican has the Kennedy seat. Just the start of the people who make the country work taking their government back. I love it!![]()
Mgoblue201 said:From the hands of the big business, big spending party, into the hands of the big business, big spending party. Choice is great, isn't it?
cntrational said:
You may as well tell the sun not to shine.Diablos said:If this doesn't teach the Dems to become more aggressive and go nuclear they almost deserve to lose every seat they have up this year. STOP FUCKING AROUND.
"In many ways the campaign in Massachusetts became a referendum not only on health care reform but also on the openness and integrity of our government process. It is vital that we restore the respect of the American people in our system of government and in our leaders. To that end, I believe it would only be fair and prudent that we suspend further votes on health care legislation until Senator-elect Brown is seated,"
Amir0x said:So hey how about HCR crumbling and the US having the wait yet more decades before worthwhile reform can be delivered?
Eh? Isn't that awesome guys? I think I'm going to vote for Obama and his PA cronies again so that all this dramatic change and leadership can be continued.
God the USA is so dumb.
Tamanon said:Either way, it's more the fault of folks who suddenly put all the power in the 60th seat when it was 58 at election day. That just made it so that the GOP could effectively turn into a counter-party instead and push everything as the liberal agenda.
It doesn't hurt that 30% of our electorate is retarded.kitch9 said:Man, you Yanks are a fickle bunch! :lol Does this mean the love affair with your first black president is over?
I don't get how some americans can possibly think your current system of those with money can be healthy and those with none can get fucked works......
Take the UK, we still have the option to have private medical insurance if we want, but most don't bother because whilst the NHS has its faults, (some of them glaring) it does work reasonably well.
Do people can stuck in a vicious circle of being too unhealthy to work, but unable to pay to get healthy enough to work?
A healthy workforce is a productive one, simple as that. Our political parties are mostly assholes, but one thing the UK would keep regardless of who was in power would be our healthcare system.
thebigtony said:You're rude and disrespectful. Why? This has no place in political debate.
radioheadrule83 said:How on earth did GWB take the USA to two wars and pass shit like The Patriot Act, sign more Executive Orders than any other president, and in his 8 years send the entire world to hell in a hand-basket... and the American people only just managed to stop the republicans getting a 3rd term?
And how after 1 year of Obama, after having inherited those wars, an unprecidented budget defecit and an unprecidented financial crisis - are people 'disappointed' and why are they railing against him so soon? What the fuck is wrong with you America?
Dram said:George Bush had 9/11.
RiskyChris said:People are disappointed in the same way as Bush because both Bush and Obama were leaders when the country was going to hell.
Sirpopopop said:Yeah, let's ignore the fact that Bush's policies actively got us into our mess, while Obama has been unable to do anything because Bush's patsies are blocking him at every angle with the threat of a filibuster.
Go fuck yourself.
gkrykewy said:I understand your sentiment, but this is a little revisionist. Yes, Bush's tax cuts and wars combined with the economic collapse to create the massive deficit that has consumed the political dialogue (such as it is) in this country.
But the economic collapse itself, which is the real elephant in the room, has plenty of blame to go around.
Jason's Ultimatum said:Eh. This is your typical election cycle. That's all. In the 1982 midterm election, republicans lost 26 house seats.
Steve Youngblood said:So I was reading the story on the local paper's website, and then, because I like to torture myself, reading the comments section. I always find the divorce from reality to be simultaneously depressing and hilarious. That's not to fault voters on the right from taking some degree of pleasure in seeing the Dems lose the MA seat. However, I don't understand the hyperbolic celebration where this becomes the sign that "America is sick of Obama's radical, liberal agenda, and we're taking this country back!" (paraphrasing).
It's been a year, and he hasn't accomplished much of anything. "The long nightmare is finally showing signs of ending!" What nightmare? Nothing happened. We got a stimulus bill passed when he first took over! That was about it.
Steve Youngblood said:So I was reading the story on the local paper's website, and then, because I like to torture myself, reading the comments section. I always find the divorce from reality to be simultaneously depressing and hilarious. That's not to fault voters on the right from taking some degree of pleasure in seeing the Dems lose the MA seat. However, I don't understand the hyperbolic celebration where this becomes the sign that "America is sick of Obama's radical, liberal agenda, and we're taking this country back!" (paraphrasing).
It's been a year, and he hasn't accomplished much of anything. "The long nightmare is finally showing signs of ending!" What nightmare? Nothing happened. We got a stimulus bill passed when he first took over! That was about it.
Sirpopopop said:This is true, but that's not my point, and that's not Chris' point.
He is saying that Bush and Obama are both to blame for our present predicament. Do you agree with that?
gkrykewy said:Chris can speak for himself, but I think his point was rather that both Bush and Obama have been present for 2008-09, when the country appears to be going to shit, and both have appeared fairly impotent about it.
Sirpopopop said:As a power, America was still nascent. We're going downhill, and this election signals to me that we aren't going to do anything to stop it.
ToxicAdam said:This is just one state in America. They don't speak for America. Brown ran a better campaign in a state that is 50 percent independent. Brown was the beneficiary of running in a special election that was being viewed by the entire country. For the common voter, this was a perfect time to "send a message". Not to Obama, not to Democrats. But to all the lazy politicians that take their vote for granted. Both nationally and to the local "machine" that churns out uninspired, safe candidates and just expects the votes to roll in. When the going gets rough, you just churn out the same old polarized playbook to remind the voter of who the "other guy" is (and boy, is he EVIL) and then you coast to a 10 point win.
Not this time.
So Democrats (and incumbents) are going to have to be smart. Just simply using the same playbook (trying to pin a candidate to Bush is one) is not going to work in this political climate. You better be focused on jobs, you better campaign hard and you better not get too negative. Or even a "sure thing" can be lost to a relative nobody.
ViperVisor said:Not in the mood to let bullshit slide.
This is 5 months ago.
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/node/30594
8 weeks of additional lolly-gagging and we get 1 irrelevant vote from Olympia "My vote today is my vote today. It doesn't forecast what my vote will be tomorrow." Snowe.
Sirpopopop said:This is true, but that's not my point, and that's not Chris' point.
He is saying that Bush and Obama are both to blame for our present predicament. Do you agree with that?
Because if you do, that's fucking retarded. I'm not going to even put a veneer of civility on it anymore. I'm genuinely ticked off right now, and not happy that I'm stuck in the U.S. for the foreseeable future.
sonicmj1 said:Isn't he implying the opposite: that neither Bush nor Obama were responsible for the predicaments they faced when they became President?
Deus Ex Machina said:Who's not watching the news tomorrow?
Jason's Ultimatum said:I just really cannot see a republican winning in 2012. Voters cannot be that stupid to vote for more trickle-down economics.
radioheadrule83 said:Your healthcare and insurance systems are a pathetic self inflicted injustice, and they NEED reforming just to bring you in line with the rest of the developed world. Maybe you disagree with particulars of the democrat bill, but if you fight any reform altogether, its on your own heads.
The dems should push it through just to drag you kicking and screaming into the modern age. The same way GWB dragged the world kicking and screaming into that last shitty decade of 'war on terror'.
besada said:You'd think Bush's second term would clue you in to how stupid the electorate is capable of being.
gkrykewy said:Chris can speak for himself, but I think his point was rather that both Bush and Obama have been present for 2008-09, when the country appears to be going to shit, and both have appeared fairly impotent about it.