Pneumonia is nothing to mess around with, it nearly killed me a few years ago. Take care.Normally I would like to join you guys as this thread collapses under its own weight from trolling and panic and we tear a hole in the forum, but apparently it seems likely I have pneumonia and I'm too busy sleeping or constantly coughing to really follow along. Scheduled to see a doctor today to get looked at.![]()
Obummer tried to rid world of press corps
The popular vote polls are all well and good, but in the end, don't matter. In reality, only 538 people get to vote for President--the presidential electors. As we have been pointing out since June 4th, if Obama wins the states the Democrats have won five times in a row, which seems quite likely, he has a base of 242 electoral votes. He also seems likely to win Nevada and New Mexico, bringing him to 253. How might he get the remaining 17? The scenarios are below. The swing states being fought over and the EVs are: Florida (29), Ohio (18), North Carolina (15), Virginia (13), Colorado (9), Iowa (6), and New Hampshire (4).
Florida 282
Ohio 271
North Carolina + any other swing state ≥ 272
Virginia + any other swing state except New Hampshire ≥ 272
Colorado + Iowa + New Hampshire 272
Romney's job is to make sure that none of these scenarios hold. This means he must win Florida and Ohio and probably North Carolina. He can lose Virginia, provided that he wins every other swing state. But even if he wins Florida, North Carolina, Virginia, and Ohio, he is still not home free. Even under these circumstances, he needs to win one of Colorado, Iowa, or New Hampshire. Of course, if he manages to win one of the normally blue states, like Wisconsin or Pennsylvania, he gets other routes to 270, but these seem unlikely.
They do cellphones, they are just automated.
They do cellphones, they are just automated.
Romney has made no noticeable gains in Rasmussens national numbers (consistently held a 2-4 point lead). Why would their Ohio numbers suddenly change?
I thought it was illegal to auto call cells,
PD, hun, yesterday Puddles asked for suggestions for your avatar after the election. I've drawn up a couple different variations on the same theme to be considered.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Much love.
PD, hun, yesterday Puddles asked for suggestions for your avatar after the election. I've drawn up a couple different variations on the same theme to be considered.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Much love.
UPDATE Sunday, 10:04 p.m.--
A Romney official reaffirmed the former governor's position Sunday evening in an email.
"Gov. Romney wants to ensure states, who are the first responders and are in the best position to aid impacted individuals and communities, have the resources and assistance they need to cope with natural disasters," the Romney official said.
UPDATE II Monday, 9:10 a.m.--
The Washington Post's Greg Sargent adds: "There’s another nugget here worth highlighting, though. In that appearance, Romney also suggested it would be 'even better' to send any and all responsibilities of the federal government 'to the private sector,' disaster response included. So: Romney essentially favored privatizing disaster response."
Very relevant with the storm a'comin.
Don't think this was posted, but...
Romney thinks FEMA should go, and money goes directly to states.
It's been reaffirmed by a Romney official.
Oh we can do better than this.
Come on man, we can do better. We can be more condescending, especially after all the trolling we've been through.
I can draw up some more if you guys would like, but you have to take into consideration that he definitely won't like an avatar designed by me and with my name on it.
Unbelievable. To me, that's the dumbest thing he's said this election service.
Unbelievable. To me, that's the dumbest thing he's said this election service.
Gotta use your troll hand for this one. It needs to make Prince Phillip look like an amateur.
PD, hun, yesterday Puddles asked for suggestions for your avatar after the election. I've drawn up a couple – different variations on the same theme – to be considered.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Much love.
They do cellphones, they are just automated.
What do you think it should say?
Edit: For new page:
Awesome. I hope I get a sticker when I vote. I think I'll be early voting on Friday. It'll be in Arkansas, so it'll be pointless, but maybe I can +1 legalizing marijuana (not that I care, but it seems everyone else does).
It pisses me off no one in the media is getting on the Romney campaigns case for campaigning full steam will the Obama campaign shuts down during Sandy.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-29/democrats-hold-early-voting-advantage-over-republicans.htmlBloomberg: Dems building 'significant advantage' in early voting in Iowa & Nevada
In two of the most competitive states in the U.S. presidential race -- Iowa and Nevada -- Democrats are building a significant advantage in early voting. ...
By the end of this week, McDonald said the proportion of early voting in Iowa, as compared to 2008s total vote, could grow to 45 percent. If current trends for ballots requested and ballots returned remain unchanged through this week, he said Obamas advantage could become almost insurmountable for Republican challenger Mitt Romney.
Thus far in Nevada, where an even larger proportion of the vote has been cast than in Iowa when compared to the 2008 vote, Democrats have accounted for 45.4 percent, according to the Nevada secretary of states office. Republicans have accounted for 37.2 percent and independent voters for 17.4 percent.
Heavily Democratic Clark County, Nevadas most populous and where Las Vegas is located, has seen people registered with the presidents party cast 121,298 early and absentee ballots, compared to 81,512 for Republicans, through Oct. 27.
Very relevant with the storm a'comin.
Don't think this was posted, but...
Romney thinks FEMA should go, and money goes directly to states.
It's been reaffirmed by a Romney official.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-29/democrats-hold-early-voting-advantage-over-republicans.html
Just a tiny lil' bump of Hopium this morning. The article also mentions Colorado looking a bit less rosy, but the fundamentals of this race overall still look damn fine. Either one will do, in addition to Ohio.
I hope he gets absolutely destroyed for saying this. This is a catastrophically stupid thing to say; local and state officials are nowhere near as knowledgeable in how to handle these situations and leadership is typically a mess; with state governments, local governments, and nonprofits not being aware of their exact role in relief efforts. If the federal government is going to spend the money in helping with these situations it needs to provide oversight, as well.
Letting the state and local relief efforts just do whatever is one of the main reasons Katrina caused as much long-term damage as it did. If the federal government had stepped in earlier and led the situation there would've been fewer lives lost.
I hope he gets absolutely destroyed for saying this. This is a catastrophically stupid thing to say; local and state officials are nowhere near as knowledgeable in how to handle these situations and leadership is typically a mess; with state governments, local governments, and nonprofits not being aware of their exact role in relief efforts. If the federal government is going to spend the money in helping with these situations it needs to provide oversight, as well.
Letting the state and local relief efforts just do whatever is one of the main reasons Katrina caused as much long-term damage as it did. If the federal government had stepped in earlier and led the situation there would've been fewer lives lost.
I hope he gets absolutely destroyed for saying this. This is a catastrophically stupid thing to say; local and state officials are nowhere near as knowledgeable in how to handle these situations and leadership is typically a mess; with state governments, local governments, and nonprofits not being aware of their exact role in relief efforts. If the federal government is going to spend the money in helping with these situations it needs to provide oversight, as well.
Letting the state and local relief efforts just do whatever is one of the main reasons Katrina caused as much long-term damage as it did. If the federal government had stepped in earlier and led the situation there would've been fewer lives lost.
Not that there was any doubt, but politico does indeed have Obama up by 1 nationally
http://www.politico.com/polls/politico-george-washington-university-battleground-poll.html
If you want to strike a deathblow, a reporter should ask Christie what he thinks.
i don't think saying you want FEMA privatized is out of bounds considering the federal response to Katrina in 2005. i mean, if the government let a city drown i think it's natural to want to seek out alternatives.
Oh, but of course! It's a secret to everyone. (Well, everyone here.)I don't think you need to say Nevada will be an "addition" to Ohio. Bams is getting that state.
It's been 7 wks since Benghazi, & Obama is still promising to investigate. Compare: 9 wks after 9/11, we'd taken Kabul
That's one great tweet.Jesus, I wandered onto Brit Hume's twitter and saw this:
(Not posted by him, but retweeted)
That happened because the government didn't get involved fast enough. Imagine not paying for your disaster insurance and a company refusing to rescue you. Shit would be fucked.
Jesus, I wandered onto Brit Hume's twitter and saw this:
(Not posted by him, but retweeted)
I almost seriously responded, but then I saw who posted it.
So Britt Hume was just lying out his ass about Romney being +5 in it?
They do realize that an investigation can take more than 44 minutes, this shit ain't Law & Order: SVU. What, do they want to go to war? That's what it sounds like. Goddamn morons.
heh. i actually responded to the author of that original tweet (freddeso) and he instantly replied back along with a slew of other batshit conservativesJesus, I wandered onto Brit Hume's twitter and saw this:
(Not posted by him, but retweeted)
So Britt Hume was just lying out his ass about Romney being +5 in it?
In sum, this data indicates this election remains very close on the surface, but the political environment and the composition of the likely electorate favor Governor Romney. These factors come into play with our “vote election model” – which takes into account variables like vote intensity, voters who say they are definite in their vote, and demographics like age and education. In that snapshot of today’s vote model, Mitt Romney leads Barack Obama by five-points – 52% to 47%. While that gap can certainly be closed by the ground game of the Democrats, reports from the field would indicate that not to be the case, and Mitt Romney may well be heading to a decisive victory.
That happened because the government didn't get involved fast enough. Imagine not paying for your disaster insurance and a company refusing to rescue you. Shit would be fucked.
Well, people supporting this sort of thing are the same people claiming the financial crisis was the result of too much regulation...
It is. Neither Rasmussen or PPP call cellphones. They do weigh their polls though
How likely is it that Sandy destroys all records of early voting, leaving Romney in a position to win with his advantage among election day voters?
How likely is it that Sandy destroys all records of early voting, leaving Romney in a position to win with his advantage among election day voters?
Not likely. They would have people vote again in a special election. Otherwise people would be super pissed.How likely is it that Sandy destroys all records of early voting, leaving Romney in a position to win with his advantage among election day voters?