Jon Huntsman is as close to that as you'll get from the GOP these days.
Huntsman is tainted by Obama.
Jon Huntsman is as close to that as you'll get from the GOP these days.
Yuk it up, hillbilly reality-deniers.. your laughing will stop in approximately 154 hours.
I just see people talk about Texas flipping by 2020 and I just don't see how that's possible.
I think many of us can relate to this little girl.
Game over guys, according to Breitbart every prez election held on Nov 6 the GOP candidate wins.
Welcome and thank you for the postHi everyone, first time Poli-GAF poster.
Looking at the electoral math, comparing Obama's worst case scenario to Romney's worst case scenario is a great way to gauge the odds of an Obama/Romney win. The difference in this election is that Obama's worst case scenario still gives him a 80-90% chance of edging out Romney with a clean 270 total. That's if he loses Ohio (likely not), Iowa (likely not), Florida (very likely), Colorado (likely not) but holds on to the Great Lake states (which he likely will), Nevada (likely), New Hampshire (very likely), and Virginia (likely, but will be the hardest to snatch). While it's possible that Obama could win every swing state (due more to Murphy's Law than any real evidence), taking polls as any kind of indication show that his worst case scenario is still a successful presidential election.
Game over guys, according to Breitbart every prez election held on Nov 6 the GOP candidate wins.
Oh, I think they'll manage to deny reality a while longer, if the past four years are anything to go by.
Won't make their tears any less delicious, of course. Really looking forward to that Unskewed Polls dude's take on the election results.
I think many of us can relate to this little girl.
A shame you live in a blue state. You won't get AS much tears from the GAFers that live in the states.
God, election night is gonna be glorious!
I'm sad that the PPP wisconsin poll doesn't have anything about favorite son Ryan...He is campaigning there right now.
Hi everyone, first time Poli-GAF poster.
Looking at the electoral math, comparing Obama's worst case scenario to Romney's worst case scenario is a great way to gauge the odds of an Obama/Romney win. The difference in this election is that Obama's worst case scenario still gives him a 80-90% chance of edging out Romney with a clean 270 total. That's if he loses Ohio (likely not), Iowa (likely not), Florida (very likely), Colorado (likely not) but holds on to the Great Lake states (which he likely will), Nevada (likely), New Hampshire (very likely), and Virginia (likely, but will be the hardest to snatch). While it's possible that Obama could lose every swing state (due more to Murphy's Law than any real evidence), taking polls as any kind of indication show that his worst case scenario is still a successful presidential election.
Hi everyone, first time Poli-GAF poster.
Looking at the electoral math, comparing Obama's worst case scenario to Romney's worst case scenario is a great way to gauge the odds of an Obama/Romney win. The difference in this election is that Obama's worst case scenario still gives him a 80-90% chance of edging out Romney with a clean 270 total. That's if he loses Ohio (likely not), Iowa (likely not), Florida (very likely), Colorado (likely not) but holds on to the Great Lake states (which he likely will), Nevada (likely), New Hampshire (very likely), and Virginia (likely, but will be the hardest to snatch). While it's possible that Obama could lose every swing state (due more to Murphy's Law than any real evidence), taking polls as any kind of indication show that his worst case scenario is still a successful presidential election.
Four of my nearby coworkers are teabagging, Fox News loving, chain email forwarding diehards. Not much, but they're my touch point for all things crazy. I plan to violate one of my rules and wear my Obama t-shirt to work next Wednesday. The last time I did so was the day after the 2008 election. I'll be sure to drift by their cubes and say hi. Hopefully they're not at home in mourning.
Hi everyone, first time Poli-GAF poster.
Looking at the electoral math, comparing Obama's worst case scenario to Romney's worst case scenario is a great way to gauge the odds of an Obama/Romney win. The difference in this election is that Obama's worst case scenario still gives him a 80-90% chance of edging out Romney with a clean 270 total. That's if he loses Ohio (likely not), Iowa (likely not), Florida (very likely), Colorado (likely not) but holds on to the Great Lake states (which he likely will), Nevada (likely), New Hampshire (very likely), and Virginia (likely, but will be the hardest to snatch). While it's possible that Obama could lose every swing state (due more to Murphy's Law than any real evidence), taking polls as any kind of indication show that his worst case scenario is still a successful presidential election.
I have to adhere to the hospital scrubs dress code, so no t-shirts here. But I will make my commentary with a smile on my face and a song in my heart. I'll be incredibly cheery on the day after without saying single a word about it in mixed company; it'd seem ridiculous for a co-worker to complain, "Heyyy.. Tom's being too nice and happy! Not cool! I'm going to file a complaint!"Four of my nearby coworkers are teabagging, Fox News loving, chain email forwarding diehards. Not much, but they're my touch point for all things crazy. I plan to violate one of my rules and wear my Obama t-shirt to work next Wednesday. The last time I did so was the day after the 2008 election. I'll be sure to drift by their cubes and say hi. Hopefully they're not at home in mourning.
Four of my nearby coworkers are teabagging, Fox News loving, chain email forwarding diehards. Not much, but they're my touch point for all things crazy. I plan to violate one of my rules and wear my Obama t-shirt to work next Wednesday. The last time I did so was the day after the 2008 election. I'll be sure to drift by their cubes and say hi. Hopefully they're not at home in mourning.
Pretty sure I work with all democrats. The one republican decided to take another job last week; she wasn't a crazy republican though, and actually very nice
Kind of OT, but they let you wear casual clothing in the financial industry?I thought you had to be slacks, dress shirt and tie type of shit going on.
Pretty sure I work with all democrats. The one republican decided to take another job last week; she wasn't a crazy republican though, and actually very nice
I work with mostly Republicans, which shouldn't be much of a surprise in the oil industry I guess.
I'm a liberal, I'm not a democrat. Dems had their chance to snag my unraveling support 4 years ago and blew itIf I remember correctly you're a Republican too right?That must be aawkward for you at work, bit like the guy above in the Fortune 500 company who's surrounded by Republicans lol.
I can't wait until this is over. My ultra JAYZUSSS conservative family is driving me insane.
From now on, when people start talking politics with me, I will ask "Do you think Barack Obama was born in America?" If they say no, I will refuse to continue any discourse with them. If you talk to the pro-Romney people long enough, they'll show their true colors eventually, in my experiences.
Pretty sure I work with all democrats. The one republican decided to take another job last week; she wasn't a crazy republican though, and actually very nice
I'm a liberal, I'm not a democrat. Dems had their chance to snag my unraveling support 4 years ago and blew it
thats a weird statement from you. How are you both a liberal and a Clinton fan?
He's into healthy older women who's husbands cheat on them.
lolI'm kind of surprised you have a job, considering the amount of time you spend on here spewing nonsense.
A black man with a job is pretty rare in Obama's America, but I did itI'm kind of surprised you have a job, considering the amount of time you spend on here spewing nonsense.
Dat 271 firewall.Whether the state polls or the national polls characterize the election correctly could well determine its outcome.
Mr. Obamas lead in the Electoral College is modest, but also quite consistent across the different methods. The states in which every site has Mr. Obama leading make up 271 electoral votes one more than the president needs to clinch victory. The states in which everyone has Mr. Romney ahead represent 206 electoral votes. That leaves five states, and 61 electoral votes, unaccounted for but Mr. Obama would not need them if he prevails in the states where he is leading in the polls...
...In the meantime, the state polls continue to hint that Mr. Obama remains the favorite to win the Electoral College and if the state polls are right, he may well be the favorite in the popular vote as well.
thats a weird statement from you. How are you both a liberal and a Clinton fan?
Nate's latest post on 538 is a nicely added dose of hopium. Pretty much comes to the same conclusion we all have, if the state polls are to be trusted, Bams is in line for a W.
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytime...polls-suggest-about-the-national-popular-vote
Dat 271 firewall.
I am a flaming liberal and voted Clinton in NC in the 2008 primary, well after everything was decided, and would still vastly prefer Hillary over Obama if given the choice. I don't hold a grudge about it tho, Obama is a pretty swell guy.
PPP Ohio poll at noon
they're really going all out
A black man with a job is pretty rare in Obama's America, but I did it