National media is completely different than local media, especially the print media. He will be labelled as a bully, buffoon and arrogant in no time. What cyan is saying is true. He needs to change his persona in order to run.Though I disagree with you saying Christie losing his temper with an ordinary citizen works against him. Every time I've seen it it's been bookended with chuckling media coverage of "that's our Christie!" They don't care if it's an ordinary citizen. It's the interneterization (new word coin it!) of the country. Whatever makes the funniest youtube video wins.
Rasmussen, Gallup, Reuters/Ipsos, ABC/Wash Post daily trackers all had Romney leading. Nate Silver this week claimed ABC/Wash Post was the best pollster in the field so their Romney might effect things a bit.
/insert Wolf Blitzer here
No single poll has Romney lead except that Fox one.
538 forecast update will be glorious.
Ha to be a inside joke at this point.They just mentioned these on air.
They show Obama up in Nevada then the panel all agrees: "Tied in both"
I kid you not.
Rasmussen, Gallup, Reuters/Ipsos, ABC/Wash Post daily trackers all had Romney leading. Nate Silver this week claimed ABC/Wash Post was the best pollster in the field so their Romney might effect things a bit.
that or four polls.
Ha to be a inside joke at this point.
I think NV and CO are looking good at this point.
Sit down. We're going to explain the difference between national daily trackers and state polls.
that or four polls.
which isn't as significant as many make it out to be. losing by >1 point and winning the electoral college is extremely unlikely, both in simulations of the election and historically. granted, obama is still the favorite by a good margin, but the way people just ignore bad news is hilarious.
Which ones matter, swing state polls or the daily trackers? Honestly tell me one good swing state poll today for Romney other than the +2 VA fox one. Do you think Romney is looking at the national polls and going "jiminy crickets, we got this in the bag fellas!"?
which isn't as significant as many make it out to be. losing by >1 point and winning the electoral college is extremely unlikely, both in simulations of the election and historically.
why is tie ok in CO
Live and breathe the tracking polls.Rasmussen, Gallup, Reuters/Ipsos, ABC/Wash Post daily trackers all had Romney leading. Nate Silver this week claimed ABC/Wash Post was the best pollster in the field so their Romney might effect things a bit.
which isn't as significant as many make it out to be. losing by >1 point and winning the electoral college is extremely unlikely, both in simulations of the election and historically. granted, obama is still the favorite by a good margin, but the way people just ignore bad news is hilarious.
which isn't as significant as many make it out to be. losing by >1 point and winning the electoral college is extremely unlikely, both in simulations of the election and historically. granted, obama is still the favorite by a good margin, but the way people just ignore bad news is hilarious.
He recently noted that PPP's lean is down to about half a point towards Dems.
Except you're referring to data which specifically points to the thing you're attempting to argue against.
Moreover, national polls in the aggregate aren't showing Romney up by 5 points or anything other than Ras and Gallup. I'm sure Romney IS saying that, but I'm also sure his internal camp members are not pleased with the numbers right now - they aren't actually stupid.
For folks who want to worry, the "liberal" media is doing their best to help Romney so that's a concern
We also already had plenty of laws clearly defining the legal limits for abortion, its funding, etc. Hasn't stopped legislators all over the US from working feverishly over the past couple of years to try to pass hundreds of bills to further clarify and specify those laws. At the very least, why not require the father to also view a transvaginal ultrasound? That just seems the logical conclusion if we're going to justify everything with "God's will".Well, we've got child-support laws and so on. It's just that the man's role is pretty well irrelevant when it comes to the abortion question.
He said he hates seeing polls retweeted and to focus on averages except for one exception, he is fine with it for abc/wash post since they are the best tracker! So says the SilverRemember: Nate Silver said ABC/Wapo was the best pollster in the field.
Just in case you guys missed that the first few times.
He said he hates seeing polls retweeted and to focus on averages except for one exception, he is fine with it for abc/wash post since they are the best tracker! So says the Silver
If he loses Ohio, wouldn't be also lose Iowa maybe?
He said he hates seeing polls retweeted and to focus on averages except for one exception, he is fine with it for abc/wash post since they are the best tracker! So says the Silver
Matthews hated the Clintons for a long time, maybe still does, and that made him move rightward, or at least appear to be doing so.
He said he hates seeing polls retweeted and to focus on averages except for one exception, he is fine with it for abc/wash post since they are the best tracker! So says the Silver
Remember: Nate Silver said ABC/Wapo was the best pollster in the field.
Just in case you guys missed that the first few times.
He did not say to ignore averages for ABC. He just said ABC/WaPo is a good pollster.
Good pollsters still get it very wrong one out of 20 polls. They're off the mark by 2 percentage points very often, as well.
Don't read too much into it. Today has been a strong day with the state polls and some other trackers that will cancel out ABC for Obama. Expect his numbers to go up on the model.
Also it's disingenuous to dismiss an entire days worth of polls and focus on the ABC one because it's "the best poll." A poll that shows Obama down 1 point, within the margin of error, I might add...
Obama had a good day today and further secured states like NV/WI while doing well in CO/VA too
Why CO and NV are so important
![]()
What did I miss today, fellas? I saw on 538my that Obama is back up to 71% to win it. Was there more bad news for Obama?
Also it's disingenuous to dismiss an entire days worth of polls and focus on the ABC one because it's "the best poll." A poll that shows Obama down 1 point, within the margin of error, I might add...
Obama had a good day today and further secured states like NV/WI while doing well in CO/VA too
What did I miss today, fellas? I saw on 538my that Obama is back up to 71% to win it. Was there more bad news for Obama?
Obama was down 1 yesterday, it's 3 today. That's the point. And Romney broke 50 percentA poll that shows Obama down 1 point, within the margin of error, I might add...
Also it's disingenuous to dismiss an entire days worth of polls and focus on the ABC one because it's "the best poll." A poll that shows Obama down 1 point, within the margin of error, I might add...
Obama had a good day today and further secured states like NV/WI while doing well in CO/VA too
Because early voting+OFA. I think the GOTV could blow Romney out the water if Hispanics show up.
IMO a tie in CO or VA probably equals an Obama victory
Obama is only down 1 point in it, I wouldn't freak out over it.
Also it's disingenuous to dismiss an entire days worth of polls and focus on the ABC one because it's "the best poll." A poll that shows Obama down 1 point, within the margin of error, I might add...
Obama had a good day today and further secured states like NV/WI while doing well in CO/VA too
Except he was wrong. It was 1 yesterday.Am I mistaken or was that three PD posts in a row that weren't doom & gloom troll posts?
What did I miss today, fellas? I saw on 538my that Obama is back up to 71% to win it. Was there more bad news for Obama?