• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PolliGaf 2012 |OT5| Big Bird, Binders, Bayonets, Bad News and Benghazi

Status
Not open for further replies.
Though I disagree with you saying Christie losing his temper with an ordinary citizen works against him. Every time I've seen it it's been bookended with chuckling media coverage of "that's our Christie!" They don't care if it's an ordinary citizen. It's the interneterization (new word coin it!) of the country. Whatever makes the funniest youtube video wins.
National media is completely different than local media, especially the print media. He will be labelled as a bully, buffoon and arrogant in no time. What cyan is saying is true. He needs to change his persona in order to run.
 
Rasmussen, Gallup, Reuters/Ipsos, ABC/Wash Post daily trackers all had Romney leading. Nate Silver this week claimed ABC/Wash Post was the best pollster in the field so their Romney might effect things a bit.

...but Obama is leading in 6 out of 8 swing states in averages?
 

gkryhewy

Member
Rasmussen, Gallup, Reuters/Ipsos, ABC/Wash Post daily trackers all had Romney leading. Nate Silver this week claimed ABC/Wash Post was the best pollster in the field so their Romney might effect things a bit.

Honestly, cheebs, why are you so negative? Do you get your jollies from being a buzzkill?
 

dschalter

Member
Sit down. We're going to explain the difference between national daily trackers and state polls.

which isn't as significant as many make it out to be. losing by >1 point and winning the electoral college is extremely unlikely, both in simulations of the election and historically. granted, obama is still the favorite by a good margin, but the way people just ignore bad news is hilarious.
 
that or four polls.

Which ones matter, swing state polls or the daily trackers? Honestly tell me one good swing state poll today for Romney other than the +2 VA fox one. Do you think Romney is looking at the national polls and going "jiminy crickets, we got this in the bag fellas!"?
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
which isn't as significant as many make it out to be. losing by >1 point and winning the electoral college is extremely unlikely, both in simulations of the election and historically. granted, obama is still the favorite by a good margin, but the way people just ignore bad news is hilarious.

Except you're referring to data which specifically points to the thing you're attempting to argue against.

Which ones matter, swing state polls or the daily trackers? Honestly tell me one good swing state poll today for Romney other than the +2 VA fox one. Do you think Romney is looking at the national polls and going "jiminy crickets, we got this in the bag fellas!"?

Moreover, national polls in the aggregate aren't showing Romney up by 5 points or anything other than Ras and Gallup. I'm sure Romney IS saying that, but I'm also sure his internal camp members are not pleased with the numbers right now - they aren't actually stupid.
 
On CNN.com their election center has two links side by side.

Romney leading in N.C. | Ohio edge?

Of course you click the link and see that Obama is leading by 5 in Ohio. While the NC link is CNN explaining that they are shifting NC to lean Romney with no display of the margin in their polls.
 

gkryhewy

Member
which isn't as significant as many make it out to be. losing by >1 point and winning the electoral college is extremely unlikely, both in simulations of the election and historically.

You're absolutely right, which is why it's extremely likely that Obama's clear electoral college win will translate into a 1-2% popular vote edge on election day. The national trackers (and the actual popular vote) are much more likely to move toward the state polls than the other way around.
 
which isn't as significant as many make it out to be. losing by >1 point and winning the electoral college is extremely unlikely, both in simulations of the election and historically. granted, obama is still the favorite by a good margin, but the way people just ignore bad news is hilarious.

yes if this thread has one big problem it's that it doesn't panic enough
 

Cloudy

Banned
which isn't as significant as many make it out to be. losing by >1 point and winning the electoral college is extremely unlikely, both in simulations of the election and historically. granted, obama is still the favorite by a good margin, but the way people just ignore bad news is hilarious.

Thing is. Losing by 3 pts nationally and 3 pts in a single state is a HUGE statistical difference with 2 weeks to go..
 

RDreamer

Member
He recently noted that PPP's lean is down to about half a point towards Dems.

Question about this: He doesn't go in and change that lean, because I know he doesn't manually change anything about his model. But does his model change it by itself based on something, or are PPP's polls still going in with a hard Dem lean?
 
Obama is leading in RAND, IDB/TIPP, Gallup Registered, google consumer surveys, and PPP's daily tracker.

Romney is leading in Gallup LV, Ras, ABC, Reuters/IPSOS daily tracker.

RAND, Gallup, and PPP have shifted towards Obama the last 2 days. ABC towards Romney. The rest have held steady.

The race nationally is tied or slight lean Obama based on the House Leans. Stop acting like Romney has had great national polling. RCP leaves out a lot of the national polling.
 

dschalter

Member
Except you're referring to data which specifically points to the thing you're attempting to argue against.



Moreover, national polls in the aggregate aren't showing Romney up by 5 points or anything other than Ras and Gallup. I'm sure Romney IS saying that, but I'm also sure his internal camp members are not pleased with the numbers right now - they aren't actually stupid.

the "data" are polls. in actual elections, that kind of spread simply doesn't happen. i'm not arguing that the disparity is bound to be resolve in the direction of romney (or even favored mind you), but calling polls data against it doesn't really work.
 

thefro

Member
Just saw an anti-Mourdouck ad from the DSCC, Majority PAC, and then a Donnelly ad all in a row on Indianapolis TV. They're really pounding him.
 

kaching

"GAF's biggest wanker"
Well, we've got child-support laws and so on. It's just that the man's role is pretty well irrelevant when it comes to the abortion question.
We also already had plenty of laws clearly defining the legal limits for abortion, its funding, etc. Hasn't stopped legislators all over the US from working feverishly over the past couple of years to try to pass hundreds of bills to further clarify and specify those laws. At the very least, why not require the father to also view a transvaginal ultrasound? That just seems the logical conclusion if we're going to justify everything with "God's will".
 

Cloudy

Banned
Why CO and NV are so important

fbSeYl.png
 

Cheebo

Banned
Remember: Nate Silver said ABC/Wapo was the best pollster in the field.

Just in case you guys missed that the first few times.
He said he hates seeing polls retweeted and to focus on averages except for one exception, he is fine with it for abc/wash post since they are the best tracker! So says the Silver
 
He said he hates seeing polls retweeted and to focus on averages except for one exception, he is fine with it for abc/wash post since they are the best tracker! So says the Silver

He did not say to ignore averages for ABC. He just said ABC/WaPo is a good pollster.

Good pollsters still get it very wrong one out of 20 polls. They're off the mark by 2 percentage points very often, as well.

Don't read too much into it. Today has been a strong day with the state polls and some other trackers that will cancel out ABC for Obama. Expect his numbers to go up on the model.
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
Remember: Nate Silver said ABC/Wapo was the best pollster in the field.

Just in case you guys missed that the first few times.

Oh snap. Romney has won the election, guys.
 
He did not say to ignore averages for ABC. He just said ABC/WaPo is a good pollster.

Good pollsters still get it very wrong one out of 20 polls. They're off the mark by 2 percentage points very often, as well.

Don't read too much into it. Today has been a strong day with the state polls and some other trackers that will cancel out ABC for Obama. Expect his numbers to go up on the model.

Also it's disingenuous to dismiss an entire days worth of polls and focus on the ABC one because it's "the best poll." A poll that shows Obama down 1 point, within the margin of error, I might add...

Obama had a good day today and further secured states like NV/WI while doing well in CO/VA too
 

Arde5643

Member
Also it's disingenuous to dismiss an entire days worth of polls and focus on the ABC one because it's "the best poll." A poll that shows Obama down 1 point, within the margin of error, I might add...

Obama had a good day today and further secured states like NV/WI while doing well in CO/VA too

Goddamnit, PD - stop breaking your character.
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
Besides, ABC/WaPo reports its numbers by rounding up and down anyways. It was 47-48 on Monday and that number was actually 47.45-47.55 or something. It's all in the range of typical noise you get running a poll that often.

What did I miss today, fellas? I saw on 538my that Obama is back up to 71% to win it. Was there more bad news for Obama?

Washington Post just ran the election. Romney's already installing clones of Clarence Thomas in every position of his cabinet and SCOTUS.
 

Cloudy

Banned
Also it's disingenuous to dismiss an entire days worth of polls and focus on the ABC one because it's "the best poll." A poll that shows Obama down 1 point, within the margin of error, I might add...

Obama had a good day today and further secured states like NV/WI while doing well in CO/VA too

ABC poll is 50-47. Besides that, I agree with you
 
What did I miss today, fellas? I saw on 538my that Obama is back up to 71% to win it. Was there more bad news for Obama?

That's actually yesterday's update. Waiting on today's which should improve it a bit more.

Good polls out of Colorado, Nevada, NC, and Va for Obama today. Even Florida not bad (Romney +1).
 
Also it's disingenuous to dismiss an entire days worth of polls and focus on the ABC one because it's "the best poll." A poll that shows Obama down 1 point, within the margin of error, I might add...

Obama had a good day today and further secured states like NV/WI while doing well in CO/VA too

Is shows Obama down 3
 
Because early voting+OFA. I think the GOTV could blow Romney out the water if Hispanics show up.

IMO a tie in CO or VA probably equals an Obama victory

Obama is only down 1 point in it, I wouldn't freak out over it.

Also it's disingenuous to dismiss an entire days worth of polls and focus on the ABC one because it's "the best poll." A poll that shows Obama down 1 point, within the margin of error, I might add...

Obama had a good day today and further secured states like NV/WI while doing well in CO/VA too

Am I mistaken or was that three PD posts in a row that weren't doom & gloom troll posts?
 
What did I miss today, fellas? I saw on 538my that Obama is back up to 71% to win it. Was there more bad news for Obama?

Cheebs being the antithesis of Heavy when it comes to the Lakers
PD trying to bait, switch, bait and switch again when it comes to trolling
Me being rejected by Dax
Diablo running around going O THE NOZE!!!
All with some hopium mixed in
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom