This was a reality television segment, without question.
This our world, now.
This was a reality television segment, without question.
Hillary is extremely qualified and quite liberal. What exactly do you mean?All I can say is that I'm glad I'm not American and I don't have to choose between one of those two for president. How the hell are those the options you end up with.
Quoting this so it doesn't get lost ...
He can recognise anothers positive qualities.
Her answer was shit, and as Trump recognised, backhanded.
Yep. People who think Trump won are delusional...
I can't believe people are giving this to Trump. He
1. Dodged questions
2. Threatened to jail his opponent
3. Attacked the moderators
4. Non-apology
5. Disagreed with his running mate
6. Made shit comments under his breath
It really is a list of pros and cons.Yep, how did we end up with someone that is a champion of social justice, healthcare, a sound and competent leader up against a cheeto monster.
I could see a very real scenario of the Electoral College choosing Hillary if Donald should happen to win the popular vote.You all know Trump's gonna lose whether he gets the most votes or not from the people.
Trump did a decent job presenting Hillary as a corrupt, dirty politician, and I think there was a point where he successfully threw her off. Hillary didn't do herself any favors with her largely ineffective answers to the related questions that were asked to her.
Did the networks really not have any undecided focus groups ready for this debate? Frank Luntz is nowhere to be seen on CBS and I haven't heard you guys mention a CNN group either.
I don't think it counts as being a sore winner when he knows that he's already lost.Can anyone think of another presidential nominee who has not only shown to be a sore loser [rigged election, not support winner etc.] but has also shown to be a sore winner [When I win, you're going to jail]?
It's nice to see Drumpf GAF make an appearance.
As rare as it is
I'm more concerned a fashion company would name an outfit like that.
That's a really dumb mentality considering she's winning pretty handily. She could draw every day until the election and still win.A draw is a loss for her, that is the entire point, that is the Trump curve.
Honestly she looked like shit tonight, she should have smoked this shit. It was her format and given the past 24 hours and we are saying meh draw. She dropped the ball.
People were saying he should drop out, its over, yadda yada, draw.
Hmm. I guess so. At the time, it felt like a much closer zoom..
Ninja, I just want to say that you're consistently one of my favorite posters in every topic. You basically say whatever I want to say before I can say it on a regular basis.if you think the story with the tapes and Trump's issues with women are done, it's going to be a very interesting week for you. The fact that you think the script is back on "emails", a topic that has yet to gain any real traction no matter how hard Trump pushes it, makes me think you don't have an accurate read of what is going on.
All I can say is that I'm glad I'm not American and I don't have to choose between one of those two for president. How the hell are those the options you end up with.
People who think Trump won, (outside of the die-hard base), are basing it on the same 'metric' for Donald that has been existent this whole time - that of attack, style, and anti-Washington Elite sentiment.
He lost on a lot of issues, but that doesn't matter 'when he has Hillary on the defensive'.
That being said, I don't think he himself stood up strongly enough to really move the needle.
Man what a buffoon he isSomeone shut Jeff Lord the hell up please.
Her odds in the betting markets went from 80% to 78% after the debate.
So Trump did better than expected but tonight won't change much.
I'm guessing the other 28% was mostly pointless fluff
Oh my god
He has a disposable camera...
Surprised it wasn't higher.
He has a disposable camera...
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features...-more-likely-to-rebound-in-the-second-debate/
Worth mentioning a 538 article that points out the second debate is rarely a gamechanger. It's possible, but nothing during this debate seems to be of caliber needed to swing the votes substantially.
Are you calling Abraham Lincoln a liar?
These people saying how it was a tie all while bringing up all of the shitty and stupid things he did in the debate, while saying nothing about Hillary... what. The bar has never been so low.
CNN going crazy hahaha
He has a disposable camera...
It's incredibly frustrating watching CNN talk about him like he's a normal candidate with normal policy positions. It's just...idunno. Like, call a clown a clown. Fuck the pomp and circumstance. No reason to give him legitimacy by pretending he is an equal to a Hillary Clinton.
On what planet is a draw a loss for the candidate that is firmly in the lead?
I'd love to see them defend the right-wing's desire to legalize torture of LGBT americans.
I'd love to see that.
He has a disposable camera...