-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
pawel86ck
Banned
Your screenshot looks like a photo. Graphics is clearly much better compared to GTA 5, so no wonder game is much more demanding.Not bad with GTX 1080Ti in 3440x1440p (Textures : ultra / others settings on high & TAA on medium only) 50~60fps on average
Last edited:
Jayjayhd34
Member
tried everything I found in the internet but still getting launcher crashs.
I can't get past the load screen just loads forever.
GymWolf
Gold Member
Lol this
JareBear: Remastered
Banned
Thanks for sharing this
I was exciting to wake up this morning but I might have to hold off until I upgrade my GPU
thelastword
Banned
Well the game was definitely unoptimized on PRO with their wonky resolution etc.......So I had no doubt it would be a bit "brute-forcish" on.....However, I feel they have cranked up the settings on PC vs the consoles a fair bit......So PC (at best settings) vs Consoles should be a very interesting faceoff to look forward to in the next few hours....
thelastword
Banned
Vulkan and DX12?.....This should run better on AMD hardware then....
LaughingStock
Member
I tried both and it seems to run better with vulkan on nvidia (1080 ti). Like 15 to 20 fps better.
I used geforce experience to set the graphical options. I'm getting 50 - 80 fps.
GymWolf
Gold Member
Aim on console is fucked for thos game, it's not a gamepad thing...
Horizon or gears are 100x times better even with a gamepad and no autoaim.
Last edited:
pawel86ck
Banned
45-50fps at 1080p and medium settings on 1060 6GB is not a good result. He had to run the game at 720p in order to get 60fps.
Revolutionary
Member
Was playing RDO smoothly for about 2 hours and the frames suddenly shit the bed. Seeing a lot of streamers with the same issue. Single player seems fine, though. Weird!
Tygeezy
Member
99 % gpu usage equals higher input lag.Not bad with GTX 1080Ti in 3440x1440p (Textures : ultra / others settings on high & TAA on medium only) 50~60fps on average
Jayjayhd34
Member
All running fine now. Getting 30 to 40 fps ultra 4k.
Tygeezy
Member
Until gryoscope is embraced it is definitely a gamepad thing. I'm sure rdr 2 added input lag also adds more layer of suck, but the primary issue is lack of precision that traditional stick only gamepad suffer from.
General Lee
Member
I did some further testing, and at least on my system and settings it was best to stick to borderless windowed mode with vsync on + triple buffering on in the game settings. Otherwise in borderless mode it would use Windows vsync which behaved the same as the in-game vsync without triple buffering, aka it locked the frame rates to multiples and didn't max out the gpu in all situations. The behavior seemed to be the same with DX12/Vulkan. Gsync/Freesync users could of course turn vsync completely off, but I'm not sure how it would operate in borderless windowed mode. Fullscreen mode didn't provide any noticeable performance increase, and alt-tabbing will immediately switch the setting to borderless windowed, which will in turn enable that worse vsync mode if you don't have the in game triple buffering setting turned on. Just something to keep in mind if you see the fps stick to even levels below your refresh rate or fps limiter and gpu utilization isn't maxing out.
Another thing I noticed is that the freaking screenshots taken with photo mode seem to be saved in some weirdo files in /documents/Rockstar Games/Red Dead Redemption 2/Profile/profileid#/ and they need to be converted to jpgs or uploaded to Social Club and downloaded from there. Why they can't just be png's who knows...
Another thing I noticed is that the freaking screenshots taken with photo mode seem to be saved in some weirdo files in /documents/Rockstar Games/Red Dead Redemption 2/Profile/profileid#/ and they need to be converted to jpgs or uploaded to Social Club and downloaded from there. Why they can't just be png's who knows...
Crisiscore
Neo Member
anyone on rx570?
GymWolf
Gold Member
I mean yeah compared to the mouse, gamepads are less precise.
But rdr2 has a shitty aim system, far worst than almost any tps on console, i have almost zero problem with other games.
Evilms
Banned
Red Dead Redemption 2: PC graphics benchmark review (revisited)
We take a renewed look at Red Dead Redemption II. We have retested almost 30 graphics cards on the Windows PC platform gaming-wise relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVID... CPU Core Scaling - AMD Ryzen 9 vs Intel Core i9
Last edited:
pawel86ck
Banned
Pascal owners to Nvidia : Why Nvidia, why!
Red Dead Redemption 2: PC graphics benchmark review (revisited)
We take a renewed look at Red Dead Redemption II. We have retested almost 30 graphics cards on the Windows PC platform gaming-wise relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVID... CPU Core Scaling - AMD Ryzen 9 vs Intel Core i9www.guru3d.com
Nvidia to pascal owners : For money!
nightmare-slain
Gold Member
Thanks for beta testing everyone. I'm sure by the time the Steam version launches all the bugs and crashes will be sorted!
Not as good as these screenshots posted in here. Will look better than current gen but not near PC.
The Janitor
Member
There's a shitload of settings, I would recommend testing a lot of them first. For example the water physics setting seems to be a big performance killer. Set it to 50% or lower.
Last edited:
The Bloody-Nine
Member
I find it amazing that you enjoyed the horrendous 'gameplay' but each to their own, I guess.
GC_DALBEN
Member
Same here, Vulcan is 20% faster, gtx1080+7700k
Pejo
Member
Red Dead Redemption 2: PC graphics benchmark review (revisited)
We take a renewed look at Red Dead Redemption II. We have retested almost 30 graphics cards on the Windows PC platform gaming-wise relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVID... CPU Core Scaling - AMD Ryzen 9 vs Intel Core i9
My graphics card not even listed....
Freeman76
Member
Glad you think your opinion is so important, especially when you are such an obvious outlier. Yet another typical trolling internet pleb to block
Last edited:
lukilladog
Member
1080p first Favor Quality preset (very close to what you see on PS4 Pro) @ i7-6700/Titan Xp
It's laughable.
These dropped frames, microfreezes, overall horrible frame pacing.
All the usual suspects.
What a mess, give it 3 months of patches and driver updates.
The Bloody-Nine
Member
Hey, I agree with you that the world created, graphics, sound, voice acting and general production is amazing. Just a pity they forgot to make the actual gameplay fun.
It'll be interesting to see how the PC community receives the game.
LOL
Every game goes through something like this at launch regardless of which platform it releases on - to prove this, all you have to do is check the official forum for any game and look at the launch-day posts: you’ll see a plethora of issues.
Had this game launched on Steam first these issues would still have appeared. You’re not benefitting any by purchasing this game on Steam - you’re benefitting by waiting..
And clearly that can be said for any game.
[Nice try, though.
]
Last edited:
The Bloody-Nine
Member
You actually went back and edited that post?
I never stated that my opinion was 'so important'. Nor was I trolling. This is a public forum and I've never wavered on my opinion of this game.
If you're so precious that someone else's differing opinion on a fucking videogame forces you to start name calling and blocking, perhaps the internet isn't for you.
Gamers are gamers.
The Bloody-Nine
Member
Clearly you are unfamiliar with the PC Master Race.
You’re being silly.
Edit: it seems you’re trying to start a console vs pc war here? Not sure what your point is?
Last edited:
Tygeezy
Member
Not to mention, the steam version will still require the rockstar launcher. So you're just adding another needless launcher.LOL
Every game goes through something like this at launch regardless of which platform it releases on - to prove this, all you have to do is check the official forum for any game and look at the launch-day posts: you’ll see a plethora of issues.
Had this game launched on Steam first these issues would still have appeared. You’re not benefitting any by purchasing this game on Steam - you’re benefitting by waiting..
And clearly that can be said for any game.
[Nice try, though.
TimFL
Member
Tried the DX12 settings and it has red sparks flying around everywhere (I assume the light particles that seem to glitch out). Returned to Vulkan and they're gone... hope it's not just my setup that produces such graphical glitches.
I did. Using the default settings (mix of medium/high 1080p and Vulkan) I get average fps of 60 in their benchmark. Gameplay seems to be buttery smooth too but don't quote me on it.
Last edited:
The Bloody-Nine
Member
It was a joke.
It will be interesting to see how the PC community receive the game because faster framerates should make the game control better. Mouse and keyboard, as opposed to controller, again, should make the game control better.
Happier? For the record, I played the game on PS4 Pro. I now only game on PC.
Red Dead Redemption 2: PC graphics benchmark review (revisited)
We take a renewed look at Red Dead Redemption II. We have retested almost 30 graphics cards on the Windows PC platform gaming-wise relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVID... CPU Core Scaling - AMD Ryzen 9 vs Intel Core i9
Jesus I thought I can get 50fps+ in 4K if I will lower some settings but looking at this...It not gonna happen
. Maybe I need to start my XOX again...