Well no, I can't say "YOUR OPPINION IS WRONG!" that would be silly.
What I am saying is that his review basically glosses over a large part of what makes the campaign great. Either that stuff didn't click with him, or he didn't understand why he enjoyed it (spurting distance of classic status I believe is how he put it). What it doesn't do, is make it a good review, or even an especially useful or entertaining review, like many of Yhatzee's.
Really it reminds me a lot of the initial reaction to Halo: CE, where it had a lot of people with this really positive gut reaction to it, but they couldn't really say "why" they loved it so much. This led to the reaction where a lot of FPS veterans would make it up some comment about it just being good "For consoles." or that it was sold based on marketing not quality.
Yhatzee's review was like that, "Overalll I hated these things, but liked the game a lot, but I can't really quite tell you why." Hence my comment about him not really getting Halo.