The 8800ulta was such a perfect card, right up their with the 1080ti as perfect GPU's that lasted insanely long.
And, now hear me out, with 600 nuclear watts, you can double it as a space heater in the high fuel cost winter.
Yeah, that's what was reported in the same leak. So quite a leap from 5080 to 5090 for sure!
Well, the 4090 struggles to hit everything on ultra with ray and path tracing on in 4K in games like Black Myth and even Cyberpunk. And will definitly do with the upcoming Flight Simulator.
Cyberpunk everything maxed out 4k isn't a 60fps struggle on my 4090 pc, it's easily above that with framegen on. Dont use scRGB hdr, than it tanks. Don't know what is the struggling part. Never the less I want that 5090.
Didn't the 4090's melt power cables?
What is that question, no, you can have RTX3060, 1080p monitor and be fine with gaming.
It did if u didnt put it in properly, if u did it was perfectly fine.
Here is your 5060 for only 499. I'm joking. Maybe.
it's gonna compete with N44, NV can't put overprice in those segment
1. The 4090 has Ada Lovelace cuda cores. The 5080 has Blackwell cores. New architecture = better performance per core.Can someone tell me how 5080 can be 10% faster than 4090? 4090 has 60% more cores and is better in every aspect:
Even less power draw so 4GHz clock (lol) is out of the picture.
we don't know, which cache system in Blackwell.
can beat at 1080\1440, but not in 4k
It's just a 4090 ProCan someone tell me how 5080 can be 10% faster than 4090? 4090 has 60% more cores and is better in every aspect:
Even less power draw so 4GHz clock (lol) is out of the picture.
There is RDNA4 planning get 3.46ghz clock (from Kepler_L2), but will they reach, that another story
The thing is, relative to its number of cores, the 4090 is much slower than you'd think it be. It seems very inefficient in terms of keeping its cores fed. It has something like 80% more cores than the 4080 and only a 10% deficit in clock speed and is much beefier in everything else. Maybe they figured out how to keep Blackwell's core busy? Or the rumored 10% improvement could be bullshit or under very specific circumstances.
I have a 1000w psu but plan to keep it. I plan to turn the card's power limit down to 80% for less heat/noise and minimal performance impact. (currently doing this with my 3090)
Yea I'm tempting to upgrade but my 3080 really does still kick arse mostly
There's 2 ways to look at it, one is the 4090 has so much more compute hardware, the other is that the 5080 beats the 4080 significantly. Based on the specs given I could see the 5080 being roughly 20-25% faster than the 4080 given the increase in power, the more efficient node (maybe some clock increase), and increase in memory bandwidth. If they have some architectural improvements I could see it matching a 4090. 10% faster than a 4090 feels like a big stretch though.
