All the usual Neogaf Trumpies coming in to quote that faulty NBC debunk post despite it not being true. Classic.
All of the contents of the report are based on hearsay and there is no way to validate any of it. The stuff that can be easily validated has been debunked. The entire report reads like a game of telephone where someone compiled all the stuff they heard and typed it up. Someone actually in a position of power within the intelligence agencies would never have made that type of mistake. It is incredibly easy for them to check if X person traveled out of the country and where they went.
I mean, I could have typed up this report if I wanted. No need to validate claims. The fact that the report included the Golden Shower thing should indicate how absurd the entire report is.
No?
Tapper just confirmed that he didn't go to Prague. That's a really big fucking deal.
All the usual Neogaf Trumpies coming in to quote that faulty NBC debunk post despite it not being true. Classic.
The best part of this is this was an (ex) MI-6 agent doing the work!!!
Get what wrong? What's with you guys saying the media messed up by reporting on an unverified report, making clear that the unverified report was indeed unverified and that there was good reason to doubt it? If you took it at face value, and it turned out to be 100% made up, that is your mistake. "The media" accurately reported this. If you jump to the conclusion that everything in the document is true, that's your own damn fault.Not only will this leave the media with a black eye, it will give Trump an excuse to gut our intelligence apparatus if they get this wrong.
hmmmThis is probably what the poster claiming NBC 'debunked' this was talking about: https://twitter.com/MSNBC/status/819191141174120452
"Unvetted disinformation" doesn't really make sense.
In order for it to be identified as "disinformation", doesn't it need to be vetted?
hmmm
if this addendum was to show trump the difference between verified info and unvetted intel, why was it shown to obama too?
Maybe, but the fact there was a Michael Cohen with the same birth year there at the time in question lends credibility to the allegations in my opinion.
I thin people need to calm down on this for a little bit and let journalists/intelligence agencies do their work. We already have a new bit now where BBC says sources in 2 locations have audio and video evidence.
Let this happen if it happens at all.
And for Jeb!The best part of this is this was an (ex) MI-6 agent doing the work!!!
"Unvetted disinformation" doesn't really make sense.
In order for it to be identified as "disinformation", doesn't it need to be vetted?
this is all so weird. hopefully in a bit we'll have more info on this story.And why would you bring that as an example? To play mind games?
I wanted to get excited and wishing some if not all of these are true but.... buzzfeed. I'm just gonna hang back outside while the shit show unfolds.
I picture agents sweating at computers and in the field with a giant red clock that is counting down to January 20th.
LOL your point can stand on its own without your lustful desire to compare it to pizzagate. Pizzagate is on a different planet of absurdity compared to what's developing now.
The fact that you quoted me without the context of the reply implies that's what I was saying. Not to mention almost all your posts have been going on about 'confirmed' this and 'confirmed' this and comparing this to pizzagate when no one is saying that anything has been confirmed. You know what you're doing.
Right, and all BuzzFeed did was say "here's the report you've been reading about in the news".
Other people rain with the claim of it being real
We need the audio/video leak.
I thought they said that the FSB has it (Russian Government). It ain't leaking.
How in the hell does that add credibility? I want this to be true as much as the next person but this is basically saying that some of this report is false and if some of it is false it brings into question the whole report.
Also I don't think this report will be debunked or verified for quite a bit. Might take some months. Now that all of this is out. Dems, Your McCains and Graham's are definitely going to be looking into this. Not to mention journalists.
The story of this isn't going away and it's always going to be referenced and Trump and Russia, and any move Trump makes that looks very pro Russia or any comment for that fact. Will be tied to people thinking he's a stooge.
I keep getting this wrong. Thanks. lol
It's not that it's true or false, it's that it's impossible to verify.
Many reporters were approached with this story and many refused to run it.
There's a reason it's on Buzzfeed
I thought they said that the FSB has it (Russian Government). It ain't leaking.
Also I don't think this report will be debunked or verified for quite a bit. Might take some months. Now that all of this is out. Dems, Your McCains and Graham's are definitely going to be looking into this. Not to mention journalists.
The story of this isn't going away and it's always going to be referenced and Trump and Russia, and any move Trump makes that looks very pro Russia or any comment for that fact. Will be tied to people thinking he's a stooge.
i mean theyre both absolutely ridiculous and absurd. ill give you that demonic sex ring is more absurd but trump being a russian double agent is pretty crazy too?
yep
I really dont need that video.We need the audio/video leak.
Yeah I don't understand. "Disinformation" has a pretty clear definition.
How in the hell does that add credibility? I want this to be true as much as the next person but this is basically saying that some of this report is false and if some of it is false it brings into question the whole report.
Every outlet from the New York Times down tried to substantiate any of the claims in the report and were unable to.It was reported on by Mother Jones.
From what I've seen reporters were approached with the #GoldenGate video but it was impossible to verify a Russian owned kompromat video.
The fact that the only thing so far proven inaccurate in the report is the Michael Cohen bit, and ONLY because they were able to find a completely different Michael Cohen born the same year visiting in Prague at the alleged time...kinda goes to show how much work was put into compiling this report.
Might be wrong, but still...impressive.
You realize that demons aren't a real thing right? Especially when compared to a payday who has done most of goods bumbling nefarious exposure to blackmail in obvious and public ways.
I have no idea if the report is true but I know that demons aren't a thing in real life.
That's a good point. The segment on MSNBC didn't mention anything about why the report was given to Obama (has that even been confirmed?).
No they didn't speak on the sources. They simply said they classified it as "unvetted disinformation" when they put together the presentation.
Hoping NBCNews puts together a full article online of their findings. They basically just did a 1 minute segment live on MSNBC about it, so it's not too much to go on. But it seemed like the intelligence agencies were dismissing it. But we'll see.
Classified documents presented last week to President Obama and President-elect Trump included allegations that Russian operatives claim to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump, multiple US officials with direct knowledge of the briefings tell CNN.
Honestly, I would love for all this to be true, but I'm still remaining skeptical since I've been fooled too many times before in the past with stories like this.
For me though, the biggest story right now is the president elect publicly comparing claims made about him to Nazi persecution. That's a pretty fucked up thing in it's own right and deserving of current media attentions.
The onus is on the accuser to prove guilt and not the accused to prove innocence.
I thought they said that the FSB has it (Russian Government). It ain't leaking.
The question may be what proof is there they have it? On one hand many want to say Russia lie, but on the other let's believe Russia has some "blackmail worthy" evidence to use against Trump? We need proof to get things to stick otherwise it's games of "I believe...".
Didn't the BBC also say there was video and audio from different sources?