everyone so concerned about these ideologies and which ones control the narrative and which ones don't. she's just a nobody w no vast influence. these fools going nuts over it is entirely what gives her and other people power. like, they complain endlessly about Youtube Grifters, yet the grifters would not have an audience, were it not for Era and the Twitter SJWs producing so much promotional material and cred for free. all this attention they are bestowing on these "bigots" when they could be promoting good people to root for and get invested in, it is counter productive to their very highest goals.
i grew up in the 80s, and was told in school that free speech meant groups like the kkk could and did hold nonviolent marches and public events now and then, but that nobody cared or attended, and the wider public was not made aware of it by the media. they were seen as losers w no real influence. it feels like now people are doing the opposite. we've actually stepped back from that tolerance of powerless hatred and engaged a more violent and aggressive (regressive) stance. all hatred must unthinkingly be confronted with full force. there is the need to have articles and documentaries on these fringe groups, platforming them to a global audience. it feeds the victimization complex and paradoxically draws attention to something that they are trying to deplatform. it may result in some declarations of radicalism, but the long term results are spreading & promoting the very "bigoted" content it aims to suppress. nowadays, if they found out about a kkk march, they would make sure it turned into the most well attended rally ever, promote it all over the news networks, activist trolls would be livestreaming trying to crash it, driving up attendance to the point where mass public violence could possibly break out (ie Charlottesville), etc. whereas in the past, when they were indeed ignored, nobody would know, nor care.
what is better?
davidjaffe
youalreadydead.jpg
www.resetera.com
